User Score
7.2 out of 10

Generally favorable reviews- based on 128 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 96 out of 128
  2. Negative: 26 out of 128

Review this movie

  1. Your Score
    10 out of 10
    Rate this:
    out of 10
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  3. Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000

  1. JenniferD
    Jan 6, 2007
    3
    An extremely disappointing movie, for all the critical acclaim it has received. The film is muddled, and neither Field nor Perotta seems to have a clear idea of what film they are making or what they wish to say. The first two-thirds of the movie were engrossing and enjoyable, if flawed, but the last section of the film is irretrievably unfocused (in toe and message) and ultimately so unsatisfying as to be nearly infuriating. It's not interesting ambivalence; it's a lack of vision and a lack of trust in the audience. Winslet is strong, but deserves so much more than the movie gives her. Wilson is gorgeous to look at, and has moments that shine, but is ultimately led astray by the muddy script and the apparently confused direction. Jackie Lee Haley, Phyllis Sommerville, Noah Emmerich, and especially Jane Adams provide richly grounded, even heart-breaking performances. Unfortunately, that is not nearly enough to save this movie. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  2. StevenF.
    Oct 9, 2006
    10
    Wonderful, rich, intelligent, reminds us of what we used to think directing was. So many deep and powerful images, wonderful performances, lovely and complex.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  3. ChadS.
    Jan 7, 2008
    9
    Just in case you're impervious to irony, "Little Children" gives you one last chance to reconsider that adjective and noun, "little" and "children", when Brad(Patrick Wilson) and his skateboard part ways; when Lucy offers her mother some comforting words and a pat on the back. Yes, "Little Children" has its false moments; none more so than Sarah's insecurity about her beauty in comparison to Kathy(Jennifer Connelly), since we can all see that Kate Winslet is in the same ballpark as Connelly, a "knockout"(Brad's description of his wife) in her own right. But for the most part, "Little Children" is a smartly written, smartly acted film about, yes, angsty affluent white people, but the film is never whiny, never static, because the "little children" grow up, especially the "bully" who picks on Ronnie(Jackie Earle Haley). Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  4. CuculizaO.
    Dec 9, 2006
    10
    Hands down, the best movie of the year. The screenplay is intelligent and well-written, the direction visionary and secure, and the performances are all superb. This movie goes in unexpected ways. Chilling and perfect. Don't miss a chance to see it.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  5. AlexA
    Oct 3, 2006
    8
    Worth seeing for Winslet alone. Her performance is touching; lost, warm, human, utterly real... she is quite simply our finest actress. Jackie Earle Hailey is also extraordinary. Overall an engrossing if uneven movie.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  6. BryanW.
    Oct 9, 2006
    1
    Who's idea was it to have a running narrator? A bad decision that just echoes the caricatured/stereotype world Field creates. Maybe if I hadn't seen the dozen other films that deal with this subject matter with more weight and subtlety I would have been able to ignore some of the film's other weak points but in the end it's a struggle to find a single element of this film to praise. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  7. Enrique
    Jan 6, 2007
    10
    Nothing less than a masterpiece. Wonderful actig and direction.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  8. DougD.
    Feb 9, 2007
    10
    Wow, I really am surprised to see this movie with such a low user score. I hardly ever give a movie a 10 but Little Children blew me away. It's a character study much like Punch Drunk Love, which specializes in combining melodrama with tense, frightening scenes. Certainly slow to build, but if you appreciate the satire riddled throughout the film you don't mind. The best I saw in 2006.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  9. AndrewF.
    Jun 10, 2007
    4
    The boring photography experienced in viewing Little Children was only the least of its problems. The film was an all-too-bleak, dry, uninteresting window into the world of problems associated with suburban life, including a very choppy overused view on adultery. With a script perpetually spiraling nowhere, the writers opted to slap unrealistic epiphanies into the heads of the main characters by way of "terrible accidents/tragedies averted", and then tried to create a positive spin from them, when, in actuality, the concluding moments of the film felt forced upon the viewer because the writers hit a snag in moving the story toward a satisfactory conclusion. Any comparison of this film to CRASH is very correct; if you ate the spoon-fed archetypes and messages about racism and how to "conquer it" in CRASH, then you'll really love the baseless conclusion about how to conquer the problems of suburban life in LITTLE CHILDREN. However, if you want a powerful viewing experience that delivers the goods in the end, then look to AMERICAN BEAUTY. Comparing LITTLE CHILDREN to AMERICAN BEAUTY would be a crime. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  10. SilasP.
    Nov 3, 2006
    10
    Oh, brother; a couple of the posters here seem to have big, fat chips on their shoulders. This is a gripping, haunting film, exquisitely written, filmed, and performed. It is a fairy tale for adults, with a profound, existential moral. Field, Perrotta, and the actors do a virtuoso job of making these characters sympathetic, hateful, complex - in a word, human.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  11. MikeA.
    Oct 15, 2006
    10
    I love this movie and everything about it. Start campaigning for the Oscars!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  12. Filmfan
    Oct 22, 2006
    6
    This is an ambitious and intelligent film, with great performances and good cinematography. It is fairly intense and several performances linger in the memory. So why did I not enjoy it? The confusion between satire and drama, with the few "real" characters surrounded by a bevy of caricatures, made it difficult to take the story seriously, in fact, made it just plain weird. One moment there are gross, wide angle in the face shots of caricature "guys" on the football field, the next moment there are intensely dramatic scenes concerning death, personal grief and even dismemberment. Another huge problem is the overlay of style, expressed through the narrator, the sometimes hip ironic score, and the Gregory Crewdson-look. This style overlay ultimately undermines the dramatic edge of the performances. I like a lot of films that share some of these qualities, including Bubble, Magnolia and American Beauty. Somehow in this case it just does not add up to a satisfying or interesting experience Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  13. AvrilK.
    Dec 3, 2006
    10
    Best Performance of the year by far!!! Kate Winslet will blow you away!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  14. M.R
    Oct 25, 2006
    5
    I'll refrain from calling this film garbage, which it clearly is not. It is, however, an unfortunate series of poor decisions and missteps in execution that hamstring what could have otherwise been an incisive treatise on suburban concupiscence. Field is a filmmaker in search of a thesis, a wannabe auteur who delivers panache without purpose. One could argue that the film's problems begin on the page; the screenplay contains little insight into what drives these characters beyond the obvious pet neuroses and surface angst which have already been bludgeoned to death thematically by much better films. The only actor who delivers more than the script asks of her is Winslet, who performs an admirable bit of acting alchemy. Connelly also stands a shoulder above the rest, but like too many of the characters she's left with no gear beyond first. The fatal irony of the film is that it tries so desperately to navigate the edge and shake us up, even as we become painfully aware that Field only has the guts to play it safe. Lazy filmmaking for a lazy culture. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  15. MaryG.
    Oct 5, 2006
    10
    Masterful and moving, beautiful to watch and remarkably funny.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  16. FelixG.
    Oct 8, 2006
    10
    Unflinching in it's satirical approach to suburbia Field has created a character study that resonates long after an initial viewing. Winslet is top-notch in this film and is destined for her 5th nom. Wilson, Emmerich and Haley also add to Todd's tapestry of cinematic genius with career defining performances. This is not a film for everyone but it is definitely one that will stay in the mind and may even pose questions about perception that we dare not even ask ourselves. A+ Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  17. CindyL.
    Feb 4, 2007
    10
    A gem of a film. Wonderful acting, great direction and cinematography. Richly layered, a sleeper that surprised me as I hadn't really heard any buzz on it. One of the best films I've seen.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  18. HenryV.
    Apr 2, 2007
    1
    Garbage. Little Children treats you like a child, holding your hand and walking you through an atmosphere of contrived and unrealistic metaphors and dilemmas about the American suburbs. Drops your IQ to that of a three year old.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  19. ChristopherW.
    May 6, 2007
    7
    I was certainly hearing more than echoes from the more well received and, in my opinion, superior 'American Beauty' with this film. Fine performances from a stellar cast, and a piquant narrative structure draw one into this suburban canvas. The 'story book' voiceover narration provides telling details much like a novel, but could indeed be annoying and diverting to those who do not share such cinematic sensibilities. Definitely not for all tastes, but still well worth checking out! Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  20. RobertI.
    Jun 3, 2007
    9
    Unsettling in the way that the best drama can be. Everything in this so-familiar tale seems freshly told and personally resonant. Bold filmmaking, a strong narrative, today's lens.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  21. CurtisS.
    Jun 4, 2007
    9
    The title of this Kate Winslet movie is a triple pun, and it may take you a while to figure out how... There is "brief simulated and suggested graphic sexuality" in this film, but it is not overlong. While strictly speaking it is unnecessary, artistically it does fit the story. One of the puns, and the great value of this film is to show that committing adultery is immature, sinful, and *childish.* The use of a narrator makes this film very much like a novel, in that we know the thoughts of the characters. The "childish" theme is a great and original idea, and it is illustrated strongly in the final scenes. This one is worth checking out, and thinking about. The dvd cover proclaims it as the best film of the year. This is one of those films that stays in your head for a few days, and hits you hard as you realize the the implications of the theme and plot. Very dramatic, and really holds your attention. Dramatically, this film could be compared to AMERICAN BEAUTY and CRASH. Strongly recommended, with the above caveat. C The most important truths: "...the Word (Jesus) was God..." "...the Word (Jesus) became flesh..." >>John 1:1;14. "He who believes in the Son (Jesus) *has* everlasting life; and He who does not believe the Son (Jesus) shall not see life, but the wrath of God abides on him." >>John 3:36. For by *grace* you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the *gift* of God, *not* of works, lest anyone should boast. >>Ephesians 2:8,9. Believe in Jesus: that He is God, that He suffered and died on the cross for all of your sins: past, present and future; that He was buried, that He physically rose from death on the third day--and you will be immediately forgiven, saved forever, and go to Heaven the minute you die. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  22. agusS
    May 16, 2010
    10
    This is a really good movie, idiots!!!!! the end is amazing if you want to see a movie where everything is fucking perfect go see Cinderella.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  23. DennisL.
    Nov 11, 2006
    4
    In a subtle way, this movie was asinine. It's well photographed and directed but none of the characters do anything that's believeable or compelling. There was the 'blind date' scene involving a sex offender that seemed totally unnecessary & ugly. The 2 main characters' choices at the end came off as silly--it was tough to care about them.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  24. rob
    Nov 18, 2006
    10
    Memorable and chilling, kate winslet is perfect.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  25. robertxxx
    Nov 7, 2006
    10
    Brilliant; a tale of deception and discontent, made all the more gripping because of the way a single misstep can push someone to the edge....fearless and revealing.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  26. KitchM.
    Dec 12, 2006
    10
    In my mind this is, by far, the best American film of the year. Mr. Field has crafted yet another Masterpeice. A truely engrossing and sobering look into the human condition.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  27. J.R.
    Dec 18, 2006
    10
    This is one of my favorite films of all time. Subversive, funny, and full of almost unbearable heart-break.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  28. MichaelH
    Dec 24, 2006
    10
    Dense, wonderfully acted. Surprising turns with interesting juxtapositions. Is it perfect? No. There are a pacing problems in certain subplots but the strengths more than make up for them. Winslet is riveting.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  29. Dave
    Oct 25, 2006
    10
    Excellent performances all around. Definitely no sophomore jinx for Todd Field, I suspect this film will receive many awards at the end of the year.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  30. DeWayneP.
    Oct 9, 2006
    10
    This is a film about puzzles, puzzles with emotional pieces where people keep ‘failing’ and ‘loosing’ pieces all around themselves. And as you’re sitting there, squirming in your seat in anticipation of the next moral predicament to unfold, you begin to realize the writers, the directors, and the cinematographers are all challenging you to piece these ardent characters back together again…but this time, without the throbbing grief. This is definitely not a film for people who love-the-movies (yawn…), but it is a film that comfortably nestles itself in risk-taking filmmaking. It bleeds your reality with scenes of dark satire and sarcasm, it grinds character development with good-ol’-fashion storytelling in 130 minutes (I’m sorry, good stories are not told in 90 minutes or less clips…this ironically seems to be the same amount of time it takes the butter on your movie bought popcorn to dry up on the kernels …Hmmm), and it also makes wry observations on white suburban living which are, at times, well deserved. Nothing more can be said about the acting in this film, other than that it was simply brilliant. This act(musical)-ing ensemble was one of the most richly balanced and talent-filled cast I have seen in years. Each performance from each actor complimented the other by methodically stitching and attaching their characters to form a large suburban quilt, which was made up of vexing pain and ingenuous pleasures. There are very few times in the movieland narrative where you find a movie…(ahem, excuse me), a Film, that moves its story and plots seamlessly to create beautiful visual allusions in your mind. Go see it, and become physically captivated by the richness of this 'Little' story about adult 'Children' engaging in impulsive and need-filling desires... Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  31. ChrisU.
    Oct 9, 2006
    10
    I saw this movie 2 days ago and can't stop thinking about it. Smart writing and complex characters are brought vividly to life by Director Field and his gifted cast. The end result is a haunting resonance that sticks with you like that sound of an unseen train and its warning whistle rushing somewhere in the dark night.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  32. JackieC.
    Oct 9, 2006
    3
    Extremely well-acted, particularly by Winslet, Haley and Phyllis Somerville. It is also, like "In the Bedroom," airless and ultimately lifeless. This is a rather academic exercise in filmmaking control. Yes, there is such a thing as "too perfect." This is it. And the result is, apart from a few electrifying scenes, what I imagine suffocation is like. There is no spontaneity here.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  33. Julien
    Jan 12, 2007
    7
    Wonderful direction and screenplay. Little Children is a very intense movie, full of sincere human feelings that can help you to see the world differently. The actors are amazing, and some of them deserve awards for their work here (Kate Winslet and Jennifer Connelly). "Little Children" is a very good mix between "American Beauty" and "Sex, lies, and videotape".
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  34. d
    Jan 30, 2007
    6
    Boring. Poorly acted. This could have been done a lot lot better.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  35. ScottS.
    Jan 7, 2007
    8
    Imperfect, but at least it attempts greatness, which is more than can be said with most everything released during 2006.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  36. PaulS.
    Feb 23, 2007
    9
    Excellent look at suburban disfunction. Very good movie. Deserves more play time than it got in the local theathers.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  37. Nadie
    Feb 24, 2007
    8
    Well directed and acted. Sometimes slow.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  38. LiliW.
    Feb 4, 2007
    3
    What happened with this film? Why was it so long and boring? I had a difficulty believing the actors. I didn't find any connection between the charactersw at all. Waste of time!!!!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  39. Sam
    Mar 19, 2007
    8
    Great performances and a steady pace overshadows the long running time. Overall, this was just an outstanding, and emotionally moving movie.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  40. MelissaA.
    May 1, 2007
    10
    A film which reflects the harsh realities of life and everyday society. It shows life from each perspective and leaves you speechless. Little children is one of the rare films that can handle harsh topics and bring them to your attention in a way that only your own experiences could tell.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  41. PnArdyPnArdy
    May 13, 2007
    2
    A movie about the difficulties of raising little children in young families where parents constantly experience stress, discomfort, sexual desires and disorders. Kate Winslet is absolutely boring.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  42. MarkB.
    May 4, 2007
    8
    The Godfather (a little), Gone with the Wind (quite a bit), Jaws (infinity plus one)...and Little Children. What've they all got in common? These are all examples of books whose movie adaptations actually beat the odds and improved on them. Tom Perrotta's contribution to the "let's visit High Property Values Heights and peek behind the doors to see all the hidden spiders and skeletons" genre is readable but falls prey to all the stumblingblocks inherent in its subject matter: its satire is leadfooted and overstated, it replaces genuine feeling for the plight of its characters with a smug, superior attitude toward them, and in general the novel makes most of the mistakes that the haters of American Beauty unjustly accused that film of making. The fact that Todd Field (In the Bedroom) works so effectually with Perrotta and his source material, managing to sweep away most of the detritus to echo Beauty's famous "Look closer" theme is doubly impressive considering that Field audaciously dares to use (and successfully pulls off) the risky device of an omniscient narrator (Will Lyman, who proves that God sounds a lot less like George Burns or Morgan Freeman or even Charlton Heston than like Philip Baker Hall) . In telling the story of a white-bread upper-middle-class suburban neighborhood whose comfort zone is shaken to the core by the arrival of convicted pedophile Ronnie McGorvey (Jackie Earle Haley, who's done a lot of living since his Bad News Bears/ Breaking Away/ Tiger Beat days and whose emaciated countenance is totally contrary to Perrotta's physical description of him), Field effectively fleshes out and humanizes most of the characters, with McGorvey being the major beneficiary: a contrived whodunit angle is wisely dropped altogether, and the drastic move McGorvey makes to scare off a potential girlfriend (the great Jane Adams, demonstrating what her forlorn character from Happiness is most likely going to end up like a few years later) that he knows he'll never have a future with is done out of compassion rather than deliberate cruelty. He's a monster who knows he's one. McGorvey manages to be both a central character and a peripheral one: the movie's true focus is on the lonely, unhappily married and intellectually unfulfilled homemaker/ mother Sarah's affair with the equally frustrated "Prom King" Brad (Patrick Wilson), a househusband whose filmmaker wife (Jennifer Connelly) loves him but treats him with unconscious condesension. All the performances are highly praiseworthy, but with all due respect to Helen Mirren's superb work in The Queen, this should've been Kate Winslet's Oscar year: without sentimentalizing Sarah at all, she gives her a fierceness, an intelligence and a dignity that Perrotta largely denied her...and she does for a blood-red bathing suit what Marilyn Monroe did for a white halter dress in The Seven Year Itch. (The first person who disses Winslet's healthy figure and her admirable willingness to enjoy a serving of fish and chips every now and then gets a bucket of unbuttered popcorn lobbed at them from my section of the theater!) One thought about the title: "Little Children" has been widely thought to be an inference that the suburban parents depicted are more childlike and childish than their toddlers, but it occurred to me that it could also be an oblique reference to a mid-1960s British Invasion Top 40 single of the same name by Billy J. Kramer and the Dakotas in which the narrator would love to go much further with his inamorata than he's able to because those damned little kids are constantly in the way. Y'think? Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  43. MarkK.
    Jun 10, 2007
    7
    There is some promise here, but the characters tend towards the stereotypical; also, running time could have been at least 20 minutes shorter. Overall, the DVD box made promises the movie couldn't deliver upon.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  44. DanC.
    Jun 23, 2007
    9
    An unusual but very good film. Kate Winslet is subtle and brilliant throughout - yet another reason she's one of my favorite actresses. The strange texture of the characters' lives in handled in a sympathetic but realistic way. They are flawed people searching for happiness, but also capable of much love and understanding. See it.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  45. TonyB.
    Sep 26, 2007
    5
    This is a well-acted film that fails to reach its potential. With more plot lines than it can develop satisfactorily, it sometimes both jumps all over the place and rambles on at a snail's pace. Watch for Jennifer Connelly's realization that Kate Winslet and Patrick Wilson have been naughty. It's by far the best scene in the film.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  46. Camille
    Mar 11, 2009
    7
    This is by no means a remarkable film. In short, there isn't much of a story. Rather, there are several beautifully crafted character studies woven together to create an oddly compelling piece of film. While I can't pretend to recommend it for its storytelling value, I can however urge anyone to see it, if only for a few remarkable performances by the cast, especially Jackie Earle Haley's, which is positively heartbreaking. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  47. MichaelL.
    Nov 4, 2006
    10
    An astounding schievement. A perfect "10". No one is more surprised than I; halfway through the film, I wasn't sure I liked it. But the gut-wrenching emotion, the true suburban terror, and the implication that we're all simply scared "little children" resonated. By film's end, I was a believer. Emotional, funny, jarring, tense and achingly sad, "Little Children" is the year's best so far. From the acting to the cinematography to the soundtrack, it's haunting perfection. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  48. [Anonymous]
    Dec 12, 2006
    10
    A flawlessly calibrated directorial achievement; superb script and performances; complex, haunting, and really riveting. Absolutely one of the two best pictures of the year (the other being 'Half Nelson').
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  49. MHS
    Oct 22, 2006
    9
    9.5 (football scenes weak) otherwise a brilliant, deeply moving film. As with all great films it stays with you long after the experience of watching it. I have not seen In the bedroom but will so soon as I am in awe of Mr. Field work here.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  50. FrankD
    Dec 24, 2006
    9
    An amazing achievement! This film gives me tremendous hope for the future of American cinema. A compelling story, masterly woven and executed in direction, writing, performances, and design. A perfectly-tuned ensemble cast. Bravo!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  51. MarcK.
    Dec 29, 2006
    2
    This is one of the most over-rated and awful films of 2006, which I can assure you was the furthest thing from my mind when I sat down to watch it. Slow and uninteresting plot, and characters as unlikeable as the ones I saw in "Friends With Money." I have no idea why everyone is so excited over Winslet and Haley...I found neither performance to be even remotely exceptional. To me the best peformances were by Connelly and Phyllis Somerville, who you don't hear very much about. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  52. AnneH
    Oct 25, 2006
    10
    I heart Kate Winslet! Great performances and this movie is the best picture of the year!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  53. AndyS
    Jan 12, 2007
    7
    An unusual mix of satire and melodrama which worked for me but might not for you if you (a) don't find the satire funny, or (b) find the plot manipulations too obvious and/or contrived, or (c) find the mix between the two tones unbalanced or grating. I liked it a lot, above all because of the great acting which overcomes some sketchily written roles. Todd Fields's direction is smooth if still a bit heavy-handed (though a vast improvement over In The Bedroom). Kate Winslett's American accent is the best I've ever heard from a Brit. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  54. BillyS.
    Jan 26, 2007
    8
    I love it when you go to a movie without any expectations just because it opens without any fanfare on one local screen and it turns out to be that little gem of a film that comes out of nowhere and leaves you wanting to yell to the people in line for Smokin' Aces - "Go see Little Children!! It's worth 10 bucks alot more than the dribble you're going to see!!" Little Children is brialliantly written, superbly acted,and gorgeously filmed and scored. The Oscar nominations it received are very deserving and makes you wonder if Dreamgirls was actually the most blatantly snubbed film this year. A intelligent story of disallusioned suburban life very reminiscent of American Beauty that deserves all the accolades it has recieved and much more. A top 10 film for 2006. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  55. JonathanH.
    Feb 28, 2007
    10
    Brilliant expose of postmodern irresponsibility.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  56. Rachel
    May 16, 2007
    7
    The narration set the tone - that of a documentary about animals in the wild. Of course, suburbia may not seem very wild (on the surface), but this film shows the most animalistic moments of human life. (Pool scene cheaply reminiscent of Jaws.)
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  57. ChristopherD.
    Jun 12, 2007
    9
    This is a finely woven piece of film. A story with an edge that teases and does not overplay itself. This is how an ensemble piece should be made and the surprise is that Altman did not shoot this film.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  58. IanS.
    Mar 29, 2008
    2
    Really good movie till the end. The end is just plain and simply stupid.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  59. MattS.
    Dec 23, 2009
    9
    This is one of the most captivating films of the decade. Todd Field has created another masterpiece that is filled to the brim with lush cinematography and some of the best acting this side of the director's other film, In the Bedroom, with especially great performances coming from Jackie Earle Haley, Phyllis Somerville, and Kate Winslet.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  60. CarlM.
    Nov 19, 2006
    6
    Brilliantly done, if not a bit exhausting.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
Metascore

Generally favorable reviews - based on 34 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 28 out of 34
  2. Negative: 0 out of 34
  1. 40
    It's an unholy mess, simultaneously too Gothic and too sarcastic, that preaches liberation and delivers only puritanism. It's a craftsmanlike but robotic imitation of "interesting" filmmaking, only in patches, and by accident, the real thing.
  2. Reviewed by: John DeFore
    90
    Providing richness of detail and metaphor, elegantly blueprinted themes and impressive mastery of a constantly shifting tone, Little Children does just that. It is a deeply satisfying film.
  3. 90
    The result is a movie that is challenging, accessible and hard to stop thinking about...But in too many recent movies intelligence is woefully undervalued, and it is this quality -- even more than its considerable beauty -- that distinguishes Little Children from its peers.