User Score
6.4

Generally favorable reviews- based on 9 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 6 out of 9
  2. Negative: 2 out of 9
Watch On

Review this movie

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. GilbertMulroneycakesAndTheGoldenSickle
    Jul 22, 2003
    0
    That's a fun review Dave Shulman's written (of which Metacritic only had space to quote roughly the first third of the most apt sentence). I really, really never want to meet him. Or David Spade. One of those people who isn't untalented in and of himself (he can be funny vocally - look at Emperor's New Groove), just constantly misapplied. Forgivable, except it was he That's a fun review Dave Shulman's written (of which Metacritic only had space to quote roughly the first third of the most apt sentence). I really, really never want to meet him. Or David Spade. One of those people who isn't untalented in and of himself (he can be funny vocally - look at Emperor's New Groove), just constantly misapplied. Forgivable, except it was he who co-wrote this damn film. The bastard. Expand
  2. [Anonymous]
    Feb 1, 2004
    6
    Not too shabby. I loved Sophie Marceau's role in this, but they could have certainly gotten someone more cheerful than David Spade. He really did not belong here. While I've no doubts of his wit and humor, he is miscast here in this dumbed down comedy.
  3. Dec 31, 2012
    0
    This movie was lousy and wasn't made well.
Metascore
19

Overwhelming dislike - based on 21 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 21
  2. Negative: 17 out of 21
  1. Funny for 15 minutes and then fades into mean-spirited cruelty and stupidity.
  2. 25
    In asking us to believe David Spade as a romantic lead, it miscalculates beyond all reason.
  3. An hour into the picture, Spade offers a pretty funny imitation of belter Neil Diamond, but it's a long 60 minutes for such a pitiful payoff.