- Studio: Columbia Pictures
- Release Date: Dec 13, 2002
User Score
5.4
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 26 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 13 out of 26
-
Mixed: 4 out of 26
-
Negative: 9 out of 26
Review this movie
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
ChrisS.Mar 9, 20038The movie was quite funny in parts, Jlo was amazing and I thought the kid that played her son was the best actor/actress in the film. Just a point to say she aint the first to make it in music and the movies Tupac Shakur was R.I.P.
-
-
AmberA.May 6, 20039i thought this movie was a pretty good movie. it was very entertaining. very well put together!
-
-
TonyB.Jan 12, 20065This is harmless fluff made watchable by a luminous Jennifer Lopez.
-
-
TashaB.Dec 24, 20020
-
-
MrBigMar 25, 20039Great show...A fun movie that leaves u with a fun feeling. We need more movies like this.
-
-
BobS.Dec 13, 20029This movie is extremely well acted and the plot is excellent. Yes, it has been used before, but Lopez makes it the best it can be.
-
-
TonyP.Dec 13, 20029Okay, not a "great cinematic achievement" but this is a good movie with a big heart. And, if you're in the mood for it, it does work.
-
-
LouisP.Dec 14, 20020I truly felt cheated when I left the theather. This film is horrible and further proves that Lopez doesn't know the difference between acting and overacting. I recommend renting When Harry Met Sally for a much better time.
-
-
FantasyLDec 27, 20020J LO = ZZZZZ
-
-
8BallApr 25, 20038The story sucks, I seen that in movies before. J Lo is my girl, you know what I'm saying? Baby got back, I give it an 8 cuz I'm 8 Ball!
-
-
MelissaK.Dec 14, 20022I give this movie 1 point for including Simon and Garfunkel and Norah Jones in the soundtrack and another for choosing a cute actor to play Lopez's son.
-
-
VyN.Dec 15, 200210This was a cute romantic movie... as for those of u who oppose it.. thats because your like what 40... Harry met Sally come on now.. its 2002 not 1980.. haha... dont be hatin cause Jlo can act n sing n the first to make top music n movie chart... one point fo simon n garfunkel n the kute lil kid?.. dats all u lookin at.. well add another 8 point for the $5000 DnG outfit..
-
-
MeatDec 18, 20022"The movie feels like a commercial for Lopez. Here is the world's biggest primadonna playing the girl from the block, and getting to make a lot of speeches about what it's really like to be poor. It's image control, not character. F*&% her. And Fiennes isn't charming or dashing or good looking. The guy's just a constipated creep.
-
-
JaiS.Dec 22, 20022Horrible. Just another cliche movie with a text book script.
-
-
BlancoA.Dec 29, 20027Definitely better than I thought it would be. The story is not nearly as strong as a "Notting Hill" or "The Concierge," but it's good nonetheless. In my opinion, the bookend roles of Stanley Tucci and Bob Hoskins made this film. The kid was refreshingly good as well. JoLo is expendable.
-
-
pas03sionDec 16, 200310
-
-
PatC.Dec 18, 20033It had some cute things, but covered no ground that hasn't already been covered better. And overall it's kinda stupid.
-
-
Apr 6, 20127
prev
next
Page:
- 1
-
50Blandly charming.
-
70Despite a continuity problem or two, this is one of those rare contemporary romantic comedies that actually work.
-
60It's a warm, if pallid, romantic comedy that may not do much more to burnish Lopez's reputation, but will certainly not bruise it.