User Score
8.3 out of 10

Universal acclaim- based on 67 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 59 out of 67
  2. Negative: 5 out of 67

Review this movie

  1. Your Score
    10 out of 10
    Rate this:
    out of 10
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  3. Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000

  1. Oct 15, 2011
    8
    "Man On Wire" is a documentary filled with joy and tension. It makes you feel as you are the characters and in the situation they are experiencing. The film's light pace also doesn't disappoint other movie geeks who expect fast ones. A amusing documentary in general that you might want to see.
  2. CecilT.
    Sep 22, 2008
    5
    Geezers reminiscing about their glory day -- overlooked in the drama of Watergate -- isn't enough to fill 90 minutes.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  3. RichardS
    Feb 26, 2009
    2
    I don't understand why people like this movie at all. The best I can think of is that it involves some kind of symbolic recoding of the WTC event of 2001. I thought the movie was overwrought and that everyone in it seemed stupid. I was not surprised when one of the accomplices said his memory was foggy because he used to smoke too much pot; they all talk like pot-heads. This film is like an exercise in mind control; you have these lunatics histrionically telling you how amazed you're supposed to be and then they don't give you anything to be amazed at. If the tone had been less strident, it would have been a better film. In fact, I feel that the filmmaker's tendency to blow up every detail out of proportion deflates any value that might be inherent in this dumb story. Expand
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  4. GarrettC.
    Jan 5, 2009
    10
    Viseral, real, inspireing, true artistry. I loved this movie.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  5. D.L.W.
    Oct 9, 2008
    10
    A bizarre story of a bizarre man... told perfectly. Definitely see this.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  6. StuM
    Aug 22, 2008
    10
    The best documentary I've seen. Totally gripping and inspiring.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  7. AvidH.
    Jan 6, 2009
    10
    If this movie were made up, it would be rubbish. As a true tale, it achieves the state of magnificence. What an event. Bravo.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  8. AilbheS.
    Nov 23, 2008
    10
    Moving captivating and highly entertaining.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  9. Sibyl
    Jul 25, 2008
    10
    Though I recall Phillippe Petit's walk between the Towers and also sat under his high wire one New Years at St. John the Divine (yes, I'm a fan), I was moved, enthralled, dazzled, by the film's story of how he and his gang so carefully plotted and planned their stunt. Yes, thank you Phillippe and thank you James Marsh, for inspiring us to art, freedom, joy.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  10. JimR.
    Aug 10, 2008
    10
    A truly great film about an inspiring human being! I'm speechless.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  11. SkiltyL.
    Aug 12, 2008
    10
    One of the most life-affirming films ever! Thanks, Philippe Petit for reminding me that life should be lived to the edge!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  12. SaraM
    Aug 14, 2008
    3
    This movie had a really great CONCEPT and a super STORYLINE but it was simply wayy too long. Occasionally funny and moving, it was a 90 minute movie that could have been done in 30 min.
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  13. EvanC.
    Sep 12, 2008
    9
    Before I went, I couldn't imagine how a documentary about a tight rope walker would be this entertaining and engrossing. I was dubious when all the critics were so enthusiastic, but they were right.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  14. RobertI.
    Jan 10, 2009
    8
    An daring act that evokes emotion, even now.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  15. [Anonymous]
    Jan 10, 2009
    6
    I normally love documentaries, but this bored me. I just don't understand why this was so well-reviewed.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  16. JeremyV.
    Jan 23, 2009
    10
    Philippe is a emotionally captivating story-teller, and meeting him through the film is worth every penny. The story was surprisingly moving, and beautifully personifies the French ideal of "beauty" and "art". Upon completing the feat, people kept asking why they did it and with their French ideals they didn't understand why there had to be a reason - it was art-beauty, nothing more.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  17. williamC
    Jan 28, 2009
    9
    Very watchable. I was surprised since the subject matter is something I had no interest in.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  18. hollyc
    Feb 23, 2009
    9
    This is a thoroughly awesome yet subtly moving documentary on Phillip Petit's wirewalk of the WTC towers in 1974. I think Ebert's review log line kind of sets the right description for the way "Man on Wire" sits with you. 9/11 is understood throughout but never explicitly mentioned and with good reason. It is a story of the triumph of creativity, art and life in the face of death and destruction. Bravo Marsh. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  19. BadMovie
    May 1, 2009
    0
    Worst movie known to man. Dramatizations really ruin a documentary and this one is full of them. Main character is completely full of himself and makes you want to hate him despite his semi-cool caper. The recent doc on Joy Division was 100 times better. I am a democrat and I now use the term "freedom fries" instead of "French fries" after watching this. Dont be fooled by the reviews like I was, the emperor has no clothes. Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  20. AndrewD
    Jul 11, 2009
    2
    The story is mildly interesting, but is told in such a self indulgent way that it is hard to stomach. They talk about breaking into the WTC and setting up their wire as if they were pulling off some great robbery, sorry but it's more like the time my buddies and I snuck into the Dolphins stadium to take pictures of ourselves with "GO CUBS" painted on our chests. The tight rope walker, Phillipe, wants to martyr himself so badly that he says, the police threw him down a flight of stairs and that he didn't know if he would be put in jail for the rest of his life or what. He continued on because he had to fullfill his dream no matter the cost. Give me a break, his punishment for this feat was to put on a street show for some kids and the city dropped all the charges. Oh and look what he does to his mates and his girlfriend once the feat is completed. He comes off to me as self absorbed, self-centered jerk. The wire walk between the towers in itself is a beautiful site to behold, but I don't see why it warrants 90 minutes of contrived build-up. I still don't understand why they couldn't just ask to setup the wire instead of all the cloak and dagger BS. People shoot movies in NYC all the time and it would provide great publicity for the towers which had just been built at the time. Why would the city say no? The Notre Dam walk I understand not asking there since it is church, but come on - NYC? Sign a few waivers and go knock yourself out, why not? This doc is a waste of time. Expand
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  21. JimmySo
    Dec 21, 2008
    8
    Song of Innocence “Man On Wire.” by Jimmy So “The Sorrow and the Pity” is the domineering parent of its documentary children—the weight of the name can break the backs of all those college dropouts with their cameras. It threw its obsession at a subject as “The Times of Harvey Milk” did justice to a person. It was as good at oral history as Studs Terkel, and “Hoop Dreams” would also later tell a story that no one else would. Its search for truth made it possible for an innocent man to be freed from prison because of “The Thin Blue Line.” All in all, it gave birth to the phenomenon of kids cutting class on “movie day.” Only some concert films and sports documentaries were able to break away, scoffing at solemn gravity and enjoying a joint or a beer. Then, there is the new work “Man On Wire,” concerned with something very much like a musical performance that drains the documentary form of its exhaustive discovery apparatus and floods it with a celebratory spirit. This last-chance child is not interested in examining an issue or investigating the facts. It is not a biography or a story that will shock the world. “Man On Wire” deals with a simple matter—one image, really, when the tightrope walker Philippe Petit lay down a wire bridging the two towers of the World Trade Center on August 7, 1974, and danced on it. Petit, who was born in France in 1948, is now the high poet of tightrope walking. New Yorkers know him—in the early nineteen seventies, he performed slack-rope walking, juggling, and magic tricks in Washington Square Park, where he was practically artist-in-residence; that’s what he is, in fact, at the Cathedral of St. John the Divine. This all makes him sound professional—he is the most famous high wire artist in the world—but the director of “Man On Wire,” James Marsh, never gives Petit’s contrivances the spirit of profession. He begins the film with oomph, retelling Petit and his crew’s break-in inside the twin towers, only to break off and give us the true star in this star vehicle—not the “man” in “Man On Wire,” but the structure from which the wire was anchored—the twin towers. He shows us a lollipop dream, the World Trade Center the Oz for a dewy-eyed Parisian boy, and Marsh never lets Petit’s boyishness go. The heist-like sequences of the World Trade Center adventure will return throughout the film, and in between Marsh shows us the exploits that prepared Petit for his magnum opus: his first “coup,” three years of preparation culminating in the walk between the towers of the Cathedral of Notre-Dame on June 26, 1971, which surprised the world and was beautiful enough if he never did another walk; and bringing his art to the other half of the globe, he walked between the pylons of the Sydney Harbour Bridge. But as an expose on tightrope walking and as a biography of the man on the wire, it is a failure. The viewer never gets a sense of what the ancient Roman art of high-wire walking is and how Petit changed it with his World Trade Center caper. Petit’s background is not outlined in the film: he was a rebellious middle child in a bourgeois family; his father was an aloof and strict author and war hero, a pilot in the Air Force; he was kicked out of five schools; he’s mostly self-taught; he insists that tightrope walking is not difficult and he himself posseses no special athletic abilities; he claims over five hundred arrests while he performed on the streets of Paris. There is a strong sense that, were we to follow Petit, he would provide a lyrical account of why he turned to a life of magic, juggling and circus acts. As it is, Petit is a superb interviewee, speaking excitedly in fast French-sounding English, eloquent beyond the illusion of the accent. His bust reminds one of Cicero. But all of Petit’s words and all of his friend’s testimonies, accompanied by archival footage of their young idyllic days and their escapades, are only buildup, and all this time the terrible beauty of a small black figure between the twin towers was at the back of my mind. I cared only about that, and when the moment came in the narrative for Petit to step into the skyscraping sky, there was plenty there to convince us that a simple walk can center an ordinary picture, if indeed that here is an image of unutterable wonder. The sensible you might try to shake it off: “It is only a tightrope walk.” But then, you see Petit’s friend cry simply at the revisiting of the memory, and you can’t believe it has that grip on you. It is the memory of a moment that reaches across 34 years, and you find yourself in the same room with the twin towers without feeling fury or pain. It does wonders to the process of grieving, like saying goodbye at the funeral. You don’t care about the bad, you don’t want the truth, you couldn’t care less about the whole picture, and you can’t even stomach the words of consolation. All you want to hear is that one simple story that might or might not have captured or symbolized the person you knew. “Man On Wire” is an elegy to the twin towers. It is remarkable that it doesn’t need to be anything else. What is it with the feather-thin mythology of walking on air, penetrated by a wire and a man with the will to step onto it? When I was preparing for this article, I was reading old articles about Petit and his many feats and plans to walk over this or that (including across the Grand Canyon, which he has yet to attempt). I realized that I was asking myself: “Did he make it? Did he fall?” But of course he didn’t. It is beyond my imagination that a person can survive a nearly hour-long walk a quarter of a mile high in the air—I can’t even walk to my kitchen without stumbling. It takes something so banal and basic as walking to stun you into uncanny awe. There isn’t any mention of the old aggravating sounds of what happened to the towers. Petit and his allies do not break down and talk about it—if they did, “Man On Wire” would be colored by our disaffection. The dance cannot be done again. There have been already films on 9/11 (“World Trade Center”) and there will be more movies about 9/11. There might even be an expansive documentary on the terrorist act, the survivors, Al Qaeda, Osama Bin Laden, or even the towers that were the World Trade Center. But a simple elegy like this? It can only be delivered once. This is all we need to remember the towers, and it has helped us say goodbye. ? Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  22. MarkH.
    Dec 25, 2008
    10
    Best documentary of 2008! Very entertaining! A good caper flick, not a boring "how they did it" History Channel program.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  23. RiaR.
    Dec 28, 2008
    10
    Extremely unusual, extremely inspiring. In a Prozac era, it is so uplifting to see someone with such a lust for life; someone who really experiences life as beautiful. What an unusual person!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  24. Lisa
    Sep 21, 2008
    10
    Mesmerizing, incredible photography, incredible conception.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  25. HarryP.
    Dec 17, 2008
    8
    The fact that the Twin Towers are there no more lends this film a depth and weight it would not have had were it simply the celebration of a self-absorbed artist's biggest caper/production. Moments of pure magic - the walk itself - are its redemption.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  26. JimmyD.
    Dec 21, 2008
    9
    Surprisingly exciting. A great thriller.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  27. Apr 23, 2011
    10
    This movie is all about what art is : When somebody says something is impossible - let us begin with it. The artistic creativity of an artist is always a balancing act over the rules in human society.
  28. Oct 27, 2011
    10
    'Man On Wire' is and interesting story about an interesting man who is doing interesting stuff. I watched the documentry on the television and was pulled in to the film and actually couldn't turn the television off, I kind of couldn't walk over to the remote, I was just so concentrated, I was just staring at the television. A epic in documentry history.
  29. Apr 14, 2012
    10
    It's about a man's pursuit of his dream to walk on a tight rope between the World Trade Center towers. The story and characters are compelling enough on their own. But Marsh matches visuals to music in a way that makes this story more a work of art than a retelling. This movie owned me the first time I saw it. And I watch it again from time to time to remind myself how to dream.
Metascore

Universal acclaim - based on 31 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 31 out of 31
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 31
  3. Negative: 0 out of 31
  1. Reviewed by: Margot Gerber
    80
    Pre the events of 9/11, the film might have simply been an entertaining, high risk tale of a death-defying feat related in both interviews, archival footage and photos and Marsh's usual meticulous and creative re-enactment vignettes. Post 9/11 you find yourself marveling that a man in far away France became smitten with the twin towers long before they became the target of terrorist attacks.
  2. The most miraculous thing about Man on Wire is not the physical feat itself, 1,350 feet above the ground, but that as you watch it, the era gone, the World Trade Center gone, the movie feels as if it's in the present tense. That nutty existentialist acrobat pulled it off. For an instant, he froze time.
  3. Reviewed by: Robert Koehler
    100
    One of the most wildly entertaining docs of recent years.