- Studio: Columbia Pictures
- Release Date: Jul 3, 2002
User Score
5.5
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 101 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 50 out of 101
-
Mixed: 33 out of 101
-
Negative: 18 out of 101
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
Oct 27, 20104a poor excuse for a sequel felt like the same plot almost from the first with jones and smith reversing there roles abit. the jokes wernt as good and after seeing it i could care less to ever see it again . a very forgettable film.
-
TaxpayerJul 6, 20024
-
-
D.D.Jul 3, 20024They were too busy striking merchandising deals to write a decent script. It moves at too fast a pace (barely 90 minutes) and glossed over Linda Fiorentinos' absence ("she missed the morgue...") come on! Had potential, cranked up great with Warburtons' performance; fizzled out fast.
-
-
RobertH.Jul 4, 20024
-
-
JessicaP.Jul 8, 20021And I thought this show was good. It's just like a repeat of the first one, but worse. Or do I just think aliens are a stupid idea to make into a movie?
-
-
P.ZawaAug 2, 20021Just plain boring. And not funny.
-
-
JFKarAug 4, 20023
-
-
SteveD.Dec 6, 20023It's not really bad, just really bland. While I never cringed, I think I chuckled once. This is the worst kind of movie because at least if it would have been outrageously bad it would have been fun to mock.
-
-
KenL.Jul 17, 20023Ug. What a disappointment. The movie was a near replica of the first, story-wise. Fortunately, the movie was pretty short, so the length of torture you must sit through is shortened. Johnny Noxville is a terrible man. He just plain sux. Both of the evil villains in the movie ruined it. I liked the first MiB, but this one.....this just sucked balls.
-
-
MikeH.Jul 22, 20022An unoriginal movie which was puked from the depths of pop culture hell.
-
-
ChadS.Jul 22, 20024They take too long to neuralize K. Lara Flynn Boyle has a lot of arms. So what. And did the dog die during the middle of production? He sort of disappears. I liked that dog.
-
-
MatthewS.Jul 4, 20024Thin, airy sequel that lacks the freshness and impact of the original--all of which would be fine if the movie could still deliver the same laughs and entertainment of the first. The problem is--it doesn't.
-
-
AGAug 24, 20024
-
-
AppleH.Sep 10, 20023Loved the original. Tommy, Will dudes if you make a movie just to pick up a paycheck it shows. This MIB is a dud. The dudes just went through the motions. Boring!
-
-
B.S.Jan 15, 20033Way to crap up the movie jay.
-
-
DaveS.Jan 11, 20070This is probably the worst sequel ever made - bar none. A zero is fair due to the moronic upvoters.
-
-
RyanT.Jul 25, 20022This film is basically a second rate version of the first MIB at best. The movie has dumb humor and a horrible storyline. I don't know if I am actually a competent person to review the movie because I started to daydream after about midway through. The movie is just a cash in and by far nowhere as good as the orginal.
-
-
PatC.Dec 18, 20032Once in a while a movie comes along that, as a sequel, is both enjoyable and enhances the memory of viewing the original hit. This is not that movie.
-
-
63Short, flashy and about as complex as a beer belch, Men in Black II is also brisk. The film clocks in at 88 minutes total running time, and it's loaded with new special effects and monsters.
-
63Michael Jackson is an alien? Tell me something I don't know.
-
63Would be a thoroughly entertaining affair if it wasn't for one thing: the plot. The annoying and pointless storyline is a constant irritant because it diverts our attention from the real reason to see this movie - the easygoing chemistry between actors Tommy Lee Jones and Will Smith.