User Score
8.3
out of 10
Universal acclaim- based on 73 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 63 out of 73
-
Mixed: 5 out of 73
-
Negative: 5 out of 73
Review this movie
-
Miss CongenialityYour Score0 out of 10User Score8.3 out of 10Universal acclaim- based on 73 Ratings
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
MichaelC.Mar 9, 20014Actual Rating: 4.5. Miss Congeniality aims to make people laugh, which is does sometimes, but it is an unsuccessful and time-wasting movie that continuously misses its target. Not recommended.
-
-
StuP.Jun 21, 20014A tom-boy persona and Sandra Bullock mix about as well as vinegar & oil. Very predictable and on the verge of boring. Her role reminded me of Julia Roberts in Erin Brokovich. Was that really nominated for an Academy Award? UNBELIEVABLE.
-
-
MegaG.Feb 16, 20020Sandy! How could you? This is the worst movie I've seen in 2001. Better luck next time.
-
-
AndrewMAug 11, 20044I have no desire to ever watch a Sandra Bullock movie again...I have seen four and she sucked in each one. Speed, far and away the best of these, is the only one that survived her fragmenting presence. If Miss Congeniality had been made with a lead who had charisma, personality, talent and intelligence, it may have been a pretty good film....but alas it wasn't.
-
-
63Miss Congeniality would not be out of place as a TV series, so it makes sense that Candice Bergen and William Shatner appear as pageant co-hosts.
-
30The kind of ugly-duckling role that's long been ironic for her (Bullock).
-
50It all coalesces in a TV-level pleasantness, which isn't quite enough to fill a big screen.