- Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures
- Release Date: Jul 29, 2005
- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
75It's a frisky romantic comedy with a great title and wonderfully appealing performances.
-
75Writer-director Gary David Goldberg's script is full of complex and lively love patter, which Cusack especially rattles off with sometimes breakneck speed.
-
75View it as a fat-free but tasty cinematic treat in the middle of the long, hot summer.
-
75A breath of fresh air amid the superheroes, aliens and bombastic explosions of summer.
-
75Reminds me of the golden retriever that lived next door long ago: endearing, consistently sweet-natured, ready for a brisk turn around familiar territory as long as no strenuous intellectual demands are ever made.
-
70A thoroughly conventional romantic comedy with all the usual trimmings.
-
70To properly appreciate Must Love Dogs, one must first love John Cusack. Thesp's maverick turn steals the show in this otherwise middling romantic comedy, which retools standard meet-cute elements for the Web generation in pleasant but uninspired fashion.
-
70These two generate real, slow-burning rapport, so that you're still pulling for them even during a gratingly preposterous climax.
-
63This movie is never more than a one-liner away from sitcom, yet it goes down like ice cream.
-
63While Lane is her typical winning self, the film is mawkish. The more we're cajoled to root for Sarah Nolan, the divorced preschool teacher she plays, the more Must Love Dogs stops resembling a movie and starts feeling like a greeting card.
-
63Bland and forgettable - a romantic comedy with affable characters and some funny lines, but where love never really takes flight. It fizzles when it should sizzle.
-
60The movie does find fresh ways to tweak the formula, making it more than the sum of its broad strokes.
-
60The script by sitcom veteran Gary David Goldberg has weaknesses--it soft-pedals bitterness, and the ending is annoyingly pat. On balance, though, this is a funny and smartly paced love story.
-
58It offers a handful of funny and touching moments and maintains a level of cuteness. But it's far from original, and its star chemistry doesn't exactly light up the screen.
-
50The movie is pleasant, sedate, subdued and sweet, but there is not a moment of suspense in it.
-
50Virtually every person in the story is fabulously cute, picturesquely forlorn, adorably ditzy, or winsomely philosophical. In short, there's plenty of smooth storytelling but not a hint of reality here.
-
50Individually, the actors are endearing. But together in this charmless Gary David Goldberg sitcomedy, inspired by the Claire Cook novel, they are as oddly paired as chalk and cheese.
-
50Cusack should have been half the picture, but the screenplay keeps shoving him offstage for no good reason, and it's a mistake. One of many.
-
What's curious about the film, in an anthropological way, is that it's made up of a series of false human moments yet remains entirely predictable.
-
50Think you know where this film is going? You do, and the best thing about Must Love Dogs is that it takes only 88 minutes to get there - short enough to enjoy the film's modest, well-worn pleasures, but not so long that you feel your time could have been put to better use elsewhere.
-
50The film makes no real impression; it's amiable, occasionally funny and indistinguishable from dozens of other romantic comedies just like it.
-
50At once over- and under-written, and peppered with tiresome coincidences and misunderstandings, Goldberg's mechanical, joke-one, joke-two, joke-three approach to ensemble screenwriting soon betrays his TV-sitcom roots.
-
50The dialogue and the movie seem as canned as a Must-See TV laugh track.
-
50Short on dramatic energy, Must Love Dogs settles for a cheerful drone.
-
42This is a movie of fake conflict, fake heart, even fake doggy love.
-
40Less than crowd-pleasing chick flick livened up by John Cusack's self-penned one-liners.
-
40With a character this dull--so dull that we're told over and over how smart and special she is--the resulting glut of date-ad losers seems like just deserts.
-
40Forces them (the cast) to reenact the entire unabridged Encyclopedia of Treasured Romantic Comedy Clichés and Chestnuts, Revised Second Edition.
-
38Did Lane and John Cusack really have to put themselves through this? Here are two first-rate actors in the embarrassing situation of playing blithering misfits in a lame comedy of errors.
-
30The movie wastes the talents of its two leads by refusing to take any risks with the material, marching in lockstep to every genre cliché.
-
30Proving once again that skillful performances can't create something out of almost nothing - the best they can do is make it palatable.
-
This is nothing but a dare-to-be-terrible movie.
-
25It's somehow fitting that this purported romantic comedy about dating is, like most dates, clumsy, endless, and absolutely excruciating.
-
25Here's a hint to tracking down an intelligent, discriminating significant other: stand outside the entrance to a theater showing Must Love Dogs. Once the film begins, look for the first person to walk out.
-
20It's ostensibly about adults, but there's nothing remotely adult about it.
-
11No film that requires a woman to jump in water and dogpaddle toward a man has the "sisterhood's" best interests at heart.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 15 out of 31
-
Mixed: 5 out of 31
-
Negative: 11 out of 31
-
NW10I laughed the entire time. Great chemistry and John Cusack is his usual rumpled, hilarious self.
-
MelodyT.4