- Studio: Focus Features
- Release Date: Jun 17, 2005
User Score
7.0
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 38 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 26 out of 38
-
Mixed: 5 out of 38
-
Negative: 7 out of 38
Review this movie
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
sebastianl.Oct 9, 20054Typically class obsessed UK story of 2 girls from different sides of the tracks. And yes they do end up having girl on girl sex, but you would have to be wound up pretty tight to call it pornographic. Nothing new here and not a special movie but not as bad as some of these last reviews suggest.
-
-
RobJun 17, 200510Great movie, excellent performances!
-
-
claireJun 18, 200510Brilliant!
-
-
alic.Jun 21, 20054
-
-
JeffJJul 22, 20056Beautiful but shallow. Although the cinematography and acting was excellent, the story could not be more predictable. I guessed the rest of the storyline within the first ten minutes. The only interesting aspect was the character of Phil, but he was never explored or developed. What a waste.
-
-
LeatherT.Aug 30, 20052I walked out of the movie wishing to strangle the people who made this film in much the same way strangulation was portrayed on screen. What a cop-out. Another film equating homosexuality with insanity. Extremely offensive!
-
-
shannonNov 30, 200510If you think that this movie equates homosexuality with insanity, you've missed the whole point. And I think the anti-Christian theme was fresh and daring. Plus, the movie is quietly hilarious. Best movie I've seen in a long tiome.
-
-
RonJun 21, 20059Very enjoyable. Great visuals, interesting new approach. Not your typical hollywood junk.
-
-
StephenS.Jun 26, 20055
-
-
SuS.Jul 20, 20054This did v. little for me. I expected a lot more, given the raves, but for me, it never delivered. Despite all the praise, I thought it was pretty to look at, but otherwise, basically a waste of time.
-
-
DavidA.Aug 19, 200510
-
-
ApplejackL.Aug 20, 200510This movie was fantastic. The ending had me walking out of the theater with a big smile on my face, and it was far from predictable. Every actor was very believable and moving. An unglorified, entertaining, and realistic case study of characters. Highly recommended for all film lovers.
-
-
KimnAug 3, 20054Look at my shaky camera and talkative characters! I'm being deep!
-
-
MichaelAug 30, 20051An utter waste of time. glorifying lesbianism and having disdain for any christian belief.
-
-
MarkSep 14, 20050Apparently, there is a 3-step formula for making a profound film- shaky camera + a homosexual relationship + pseudo-intellectual ridicule of the Christian faith= this movie is a predictable, tedious waste of time.
-
-
mitchellm.Sep 30, 20050I agree with mark, this movie is vile, crappy, and pronographic, the only people who would like this is horny perverts who substitute sex for art.
-
-
JordanS.Jun 20, 20060
-
-
PaulS.Sep 23, 200610The best film I've seen this year. It is stunningly beautiful. England's countryside draws you in. You won't be able to take your eyes off the principal actresses; they're brilliant. This is an art film that delivers...I hope Hollywood is paying attention.
-
-
snewgoblinJul 31, 200710Perfect acting, good story and anti-Christian theme make My Summer Of Love one of the best movies I've ever seen. The only weakness is that the last 20 minutes are too predictable. But it's still a fantastic movie.
-
-
TomasS.Nov 2, 20059Beautiful, haunting and evocative. The camera, the cinematography, the environment - everything is utterly captivating. You won't always sympathise with the girls, but apparently that isn't even the director's intention. It's a compelling and riveting story about love and disillusionment.
-
-
MarcK.Nov 21, 20052I'll also agree with "Mark's" comments below. Forget the fact that the critics raved about this movie. It's not even average...it's awful.
-
-
DanC.Nov 2, 20059Extremely well acted. Our sympathies lie with Mona, and even grow at the end, despite the revelation of her darker side. A very fine, emotionally genuine film.
-
-
DaveJul 25, 200510I really don't understand the negative reactions to this film, I thought it was great. Shallow? Waste of time? I don't get it. And I didn't think the character of the redhead was dumb at all. I think her personality more reflected her environment and upbringing than anything else. I found this very refreshing compared to the other garbage being rolled out by Hollywood.
-
-
MarkB.Aug 11, 20056
-
-
Sep 1, 20107Two girls from different backgrounds meet one Summer, spend time together, fall in love, Summer ends. Decent story & well acted out by the two lead actresses &, of course, Paddy Considine. Nice setting of a small Northern town & a good soundtrack to back it up.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
-
90Press and Blunt are major discoveries: in this sly and wonderfully atmospheric gem, they conjure up the role-playing raptures of youth with perfect poetic pitch.
-
90Its stars, Emily Blunt and Natalie Press, are film newcomers who give startling performances. The photography is often breathtakingly original.
-
80Some of the metaphors are a bit too literal but the director largely succeeds with his story and the surprises are convincing. Best of all the film has a terrific sense of humor and the young actresses exploit it delightfully.