- Studio: Miramax Films
- Release Date: Nov 9, 2007
User Score
7.3
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 995 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 744 out of 995
-
Mixed: 83 out of 995
-
Negative: 168 out of 995
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
MG.Nov 24, 20071
-
-
JamesC.Nov 20, 20072
-
-
toosinbeymenDec 26, 20070
-
-
MikeF.Dec 4, 20074
-
-
BruceT.Dec 5, 20070The most violent, pointless movie I have ever suffered through. I guess they must pay you for the rating? I'll never trust meta-critic by itself again. I've liked other Coen Bros. movies.
-
-
TimH.Dec 5, 20072This movie represents nothing more that gratuitous violence and nihilistic nonsense masquerading as high art. I can't believe the critics were so taken in. This doesn't come even close to Fargo which was fantastic. It's only the Coen brothers superstar status that allows them to market this crap. It's like Picasso doodling on a napkin and calling it art.
-
-
DenisM.Dec 7, 20072Inspired acting and cinematography, but in the end, I felt as simply a voyeur in a West Texas drug culture slaughterhouse. Not up to Fargo.
-
-
BillW.Dec 9, 20073
-
-
LevJan 11, 20083
-
-
RKJan 12, 20083
-
-
LloydM.Jan 12, 20084The movie was engaging, but every movie needs a beginning, middle and end. This movie had no ending. This may be a critics dream, but it left me and several others who went, wondering what was the point of this movie and why did we waste time and money to leave frustrated.
-
-
MBJan 15, 20083I have to admit I was excited to see this movie, however that only hightened my disappointment. This was an unengaging story of no signifigance that will not be enjoyed by anyone hoping to be entertained. yeah it was different, but I could not care less.
-
-
SteveJan 18, 20080
-
-
sedw.Jan 23, 20081
-
-
SibylPJan 23, 20081
-
-
JeffAJan 26, 20083
-
-
JohnH.Jan 26, 20083Reasonably good drama and acting, but relatively pointless plot and story-line. The ending leaves viewers stunned - not sure whether to leave the theatre -- or wait for the movie to continue playing through to the end AFTER the credits.
-
-
TrevorA.Jan 29, 20081What a mess. The metaphors obliterate any chance of a coherent story. Can't comment on the significance of the final speech: I'd lost the will to listen to all the cliches by that point.
-
-
PriyanthT.Jan 31, 20083Slow and boring. Too much of editing.
-
-
AnonymousMCJan 3, 20082Yeah, I know everyone says this is a thinker, and let me tell you I
-
-
BruceW.Feb 10, 20082This is the worst ending to a good movie that I've ever seen in my life. It started to fall apart when it showed the main character was dead, after that the movie sucked. But the movies was building greatly at first. Too bad any one would think this ending is artsy.
-
-
DD.Feb 27, 20082The least surprising movie the Cohen bothers have made. It
-
-
KirkPMar 13, 20082At the start it had you going. But like another said same old movie just different angle. Where is the uniqueness Ok A compressed air can gun WooHoo!! The ending is suppose to be original why change something that works?
-
-
lindaMar 14, 20080Are you kidding? this is one of the best out of hollywood? truely sucked, what's the sequel gonna be called? no country for old women? can't remember the last movie i hated so much.
-
-
AdamK.Mar 15, 20083I didn't get it, I guess. A mildly exciting movie at parts, but mostly it was deadly boring and without any real ending.
-
-
SharynMar 15, 20083
-
-
MiltG.Mar 16, 20081
-
-
DianaChertovaMar 19, 20082I think those who doesnt "GET" are the ones who gave HIGH rating to this movie. They get what ? The violence or the stupid dialogs? There is nothing to get.and they just try to look intellectual by waving to a politically oscar winning film.To not to look stupdi, they say they understood something.What they undesrtood is nothing..
-
-
JohnJMar 2, 20082
-
-
RMB.Mar 20, 20083
-
-
90It’s a near masterpiece.
-
100Joel and Ethan Coen's adaptation of Cormac McCarthy's 2005 novel is an indisputably great movie, at this point the year's very best.
-
90It's the most ambitious and impressive Coen film in at least a decade, featuring the flat, sun-blasted landscapes of west Texas -- spectacularly shot by cinematographer Roger Deakins -- and an eerily memorable performance by Javier Bardem, in a Ringo Starr haircut.