Metascore
66 out of 100

Generally favorable reviews - based on 22 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 17 out of 22
  2. Negative: 1 out of 22
  1. At once noble and naive, earnest and a tad obnoxious.
  2. 83
    Ultimately, it's an instructive and entertaining examination of both the overlooked environmental costs of everyday life and the possibilities for change.
  3. 83
    The value of No Impact Man, a compelling and suitably exasperating documentary about one family's attempt to not harm the environment for a year, is that it forces viewers to reflect on their own casual consumption and waste.
  4. It all seems like a stunt, especially since Beaven has also written a just-published book about his experiences, but he and Conlin are an engaging pair who don't let zealotry get in the way of humor.
  5. Reviewed by: Scott Knopf
    80
    To sum up Beavan's message, he's not saying you should give up toilet paper. But you should give up what you can. Help any way you can. Do all you can.
  6. 80
    The movie is a hilarious, riveting must-see about a family as it breaks down almost all the way and then reinvents itself.
  7. Reviewed by: David Lewis
    75
    It may not be the greatest of cinematic exercises, and it often feels contrived, but this documentary somehow is enlightening, ridiculous, foreboding and funny at the same time.
  8. Reviewed by: Ty Burr
    75
    It's like Sinatra said: If you can make (do without) it there, you can make (do without) it anywhere. The movie leaves it up to you.
  9. Succeeds as both advocacy and entertainment by focusing on the family.
  10. Reviewed by: Justin Lowe
    70
    Gabbert and Schein keep the focus on their subjects, interpreting their struggles through the ups and downs in the couple's relationship as they grapple with increasingly difficult issues. This character-driven approach draws viewers into the couple's struggle and prompts consideration of similar lifestyle changes.
  11. Reviewed by: Mark Jenkins
    70
    It's even harder being the semi-supportive wife, which is what generates most of the electricity in this slight but entertaining documentary.
  12. The movie gives off a stranger vibe. Beavan is both a hero and a figure of fun, a man whose ideals are in constant collision with the habits of modern life.
  13. Reviewed by: Betsy Sharkey
    70
    The film ultimately is more practical than profound, a slightly smartened-up "Dummy's Guide to Green Living," which, as you learn, most of us probably know a good deal less about than we imagine.
  14. Reviewed by: John Anderson
    70
    Goes down far easier than, say, an all-natural, fiber-enriched peanut butter sandwich without a glass of soy milk. It's that rare doc (these days) that could go theatrical, largely because it's a film about a couple, more than a movement.
  15. Reviewed by: John Anderson
    70
    You know what they say: Behind every successful, self-flagellating environmental activist is a woman. And that's what saves both Beavan and the movie.
  16. What makes this documentary work is that the Beavan family is so relatable.
  17. 63
    The film makes little sense (the couple refuses to ride subways, but Metro-North is OK), but it's a diverting conversation piece/freak show.
  18. 60
    I can't, in the end (all appearances to the contrary), judge Mr. Beavan or this film too severely. Making an impact is easy. Making a difference is hard.
  19. Reviewed by: Aaron Hillis
    50
    We could all do better, definitely, but how much can we possibly glean from a guy whose idealism can be measured with a calendar?
  20. The efforts of Beavan's clan are so extreme that they spark some interest, but their environmental commitment feels a bit too self-serving to have the impact that's clearly desired.
  21. Eventually runs out of gas--or rather, pedal-power--as the filmmakers grope for how to cap the Beavans' story.
  22. Reviewed by: Cliff Doerksen
    30
    The boring, humorless pair do nothing to refute the image of eco-worriers as preening, puritanical douchebags addicted to symbolic gesture and allergic to cost-benefit analysis.