- Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures
- Release Date: Dec 10, 2004
User Score
4.8
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 166 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 73 out of 166
-
Mixed: 34 out of 166
-
Negative: 59 out of 166
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
SimonK.Feb 7, 20059
-
-
MatthewM.May 8, 20060I think this is the worst film I have ever seen. The Slate review had it right. All smarm. Tries to be far more clever than it actualy is. A plotless piece of self-indulgence from start to finish, this is the only film I have ever considered walking out of. The only reason I didn't was because I thought it had nearly finished..... it hadn't.
-
-
GraemeD.Jan 24, 20050This movie is so amateurish. Terrible script and cinematography! It appeared that this was all first-take material and is an embarrassemnt for the actors involved. I was sooooo bored.
-
-
PaulM.Feb 13, 20059Watch it twice and it all falls into places. Great show!
-
-
PaulW.Feb 17, 20059If you enjoyed the first you will enjoy this, granted its not aqs gd but its entertaining nonthsless, very gd music!
-
-
LauraFeb 26, 20053Watchable yet cringeable, the whole film is a whole pile of either obvious(bordering on slapstick) jokes and other "jokes" that you feel like your not quite getting(like your somehow out of the loop!). Frustratingly boring robbery in the end after all the lead up to it.
-
-
RickKApr 30, 20055A reasonable sequel to Ocean's 11, but certainly not as good as the original. And I'd recommend other similar type movies (e.g. The Italian Job, The Thomas Crowne Affair) way ahead of this one.
-
-
JaredC.Mar 10, 20077In a way, I think this one was better than the first. Ocean's Eleven had some style, but this one ruled the comedy room. Even though this one was kind of slow, it had a cool plot and amazing acting.
-
-
RickyQ.Dec 11, 20045The original had charm and style. This sequel is missing it as it goes in too many directions. If you are going to do a rush job than don't make a sequel. It just shouldn't be!
-
-
JohnD.Dec 12, 20041Worst... movie... ever. Well, not that bad, but a hell of a stinker. Doesn't touch the first one, which itself wasn't anything close to a masterpiece. Save yourself the trouble and avoid this lame duck.
-
-
DermN.Dec 23, 20045A fun but forgettable popcorn movie. The story is convoluted and the script lacks the witty dialogue between Clooney and Pitt that made the first shine. Plus, the Julia Roberts gag didn't work for me. Best part of the movie? David Holmes' acid jazz musical score.
-
-
LeeY.Dec 20, 20041Loved '11'...wanted to walk out of '12'. to the guy who said this was a 'thinking' movie, well, if you thought too much about the holes in the plot, then it'd get a 'zero' from me. the bruce willis 'subplot' was ludicrous, as was the laser beam dance (coulda swore more than 1 passed thru his body). very disappointed...
-
-
KyleAJan 1, 20054Ocean's 11 was great--full of wit and clever humor. But the charming part of that movie was getting to know all the quirky characters, as it was more about their interactions. Ocean's 12 is ALL plot--and a mediocre one at that; it sucks whatever life was left in the characters--which is a testament to the awfulness of the movie (as the awesome cast was secondary to the storyline).
-
-
MarkB.Jan 10, 20051
-
-
EricL.Jan 10, 20054Somewhat painful. The bar was set high with Ocean's 11 and Ocean's 12 was nowhere near.
-
-
[Anonymous]Jan 16, 20050This movie...sucked! Do this so called actors...have too much money and time on their hands. If anything, this movie reminded me not to go to an film that has one or all of them in it again. Their intelligence...is not there....how disappointing that some people stoop so low to make trash out of trash.
-
-
ToddF.Jan 17, 20051Worst movie I have seen in a long time. Don't waste your money. Oceans Eleven was much better.
-
-
ZachLFeb 12, 20057Was it as good as ocean's eleven? no. was it the most amazing film of all time? no. was it enjoyable to watch them all back together again? yes. sometimes it's better just to go to a movie for a good time.
-
-
johns.Feb 7, 20051I hope the actors got a big fat paycheck for this pierce of dribble. Because there aren't gonna be an oceans 13 after this crap. A box office flop. The story is weak and the actors like Brad can't act so there you go.
-
-
J-DubS.Feb 7, 20050This movie was a terrible waste of talent. Oceans Eleven was great. This movie made me wish i had had a denist's appointment..... it was that bad!
-
-
MattC.Mar 22, 20058
-
-
DilipK.May 2, 20050I can't believe that reviewers are still saying nice things about such entirely inconsequential trash. Endless fawning remarks concerning Soderbergh's genius only show the minimal objectivity of most of the media critics. This is a rip off. It's not funny, has no plot and no plausibility.
-
-
RobertR.May 3, 20050Trash!
-
-
ChrisR.May 7, 20055
-
-
StephenB.Aug 14, 20060I was stunned at how unbearably dull this film was. Please do not think that the first film was good so how bad can the sequel be. Its awful. There are some talented actors on the screen, however all the wit and verve of the first film has been removed with a dreadful script and surprisingly poor pacing and direction from Soderberg. Please avoid.
-
-
RirenApr 15, 20075
-
-
TonyB.Dec 11, 20048Not the most engaging film. Not as good as the first. But it was quite entertaining. There wasn't much tension at all...but it was funny, all the characters were good. You know, nothing you'll talk about a week, or even a day later, but it's not a bad way to spend your time.
-
-
KenK.Dec 12, 20041Yuck! Bad plot, bad dialogue, bad acting.
-
-
RayDec 15, 20047
-
-
GregA.Dec 15, 20045With such a great cast it's a pity they didn't make an equally great movie. I went into this film expecting a lot more than I got, and though the twist at the end was good I just didn't feel this movie had anything solid about it. Oh well, it got me out of the house for a night...
-
-
SusanM.Dec 16, 20046I was very disappointed in this movie, it tries to be clever but fails. It relies too mch on the big stars in it and comes up short in very other aspect. I must say. Brad Pitt is a truly beautiful man.
-
-
JoshB.Dec 10, 200410this film is more character-driven, which allows for a more improv, comedic feel. Ocean's 11 was more central to the heist, which allowed the movei to focus completely on the gizmo's and gadgets, plus the in's and out's of the robbery. In essence this are two different types of movies, character vs. plot, but the same fun feeling is back.
-
-
RonK.Dec 20, 20041
-
-
Mr.JTDec 25, 20048
-
-
AlfredM.Dec 8, 20044Main points: Boring, repetitive, annoying hand-held camera action. The plot is particularly weak, and the film fails to generate any tension at all.
-
-
burtonmJan 12, 20055Funny and pleasant in a sort of coffee table book kind of way.
-
-
LizVJan 14, 20056This movie is not the greatest, but it's not meant to be the same type of show as the first. This one is more simple humor, less scheming, and if you're looking for something that's going to analyze and think, "That's amazing! How did they do that?" you're not going to love it. Just sit back and enjoy a well written, but different style show.
-
-
NaKetaJ.Jan 26, 200510I was very excited to see what this movie would bring due to the fact that all of the initial cast would return. That's what made the movie, besides Pitt and Clooney's fantastic on-screen chemistry.
-
-
KobeeH.Jan 7, 20059
-
-
MarkDavidC.Feb 9, 20050If you want to see a bunch of celebrities parading around telling each other how amazing they are (which makes up 95% of this movie) watch the Oscars, they're free.
-
-
JohnS.Mar 22, 20051
-
-
ChadS.Mar 3, 20057
-
-
EricSApr 18, 20050This movie is pure trash, I cannot believe it made it by the screeners. This proves that Hollywood, throw 14 stars in a movie, that has NO plot, hard to follow, and BRAIN NUMBING boring will want to take your money away. if I wanted that, I would just watch Entertainment tonight, this was like the movie version of it.
-
-
GAustinApr 20, 20050Most unwatchable movie I have ever rented. Thank God for fast forward and mute on DVD's. Anyone who had the misfortune to have paid to watch this crap would of had no choice but to walk out- the earlier the better.
-
-
GregTApr 25, 20051I took this movie off of the DVD player after 1 hour. It was disjointed, jumbled up, all over the map, and lacked any suspense. A cast of thousands like a Cecil B. DeMille epic and not one character had anything to say of interest. Rubbish.
-
-
MikeN.May 13, 20050The movie kept flashing forward, and back and forward - you didn't know where you were; and you were looking for a big finish - and nothing happens.
-
-
MichaelMay 16, 20057
-
-
IanMay 3, 20052Boring, slow, terrible. Enjoyed Oceans Eleven but this ranks up to one of the worse movies I have seen.
-
-
JamesP.Jun 21, 20053Compared to the first not even worth a look in.
-
-
OmegaR.Sep 1, 20054Of course David Sterritt of the Christian Science Monitor liked this film, its full of Hollywood's most outspoken Liberals!!!
-
-
MeUJun 13, 20068This movie is the best stages and filmed ever. Sure it doesn't look like it but the filming, scenery, and everything goes with the feel of the movie. Also, i am glad they went for a different feel using music unlike all the other movies. Sure it was filled with all famous stars but without them being great actors who would even declare them!
-
-
DanB.Dec 11, 20049
-
-
SeanW.Dec 12, 20045"Lazy," indeed.
-
-
VinceH.Dec 12, 20048
-
-
omary.Dec 12, 20048This movie has flaws, but its redeeming qualities more than offset them. Oh yes -- two words: laser scene. That is all.
-
-
WileyD-B.Dec 10, 200410Very entertaining. Don't try to figure everything out. There is plenty to see here, enjoy it!
-
-
VikramM.Dec 12, 20045
-
-
CrapmovieBadmovieDec 13, 20040Boring, random and just made to make quick cash.
-
-
JeromeB.Dec 13, 20041I'm moving to Hollywood to become a screen writer; I promise a better script than this mush. The actual heist and ending were particularly lame. Think about it; people get paid serious money to crank out this junk. I found this movie to be about as exciting as doing my bi-weekly laundry.
-
-
mikeb.Dec 13, 20043
-
-
BrittPDec 15, 20041Maybe i would have been sucked in by he movie magic of this film had I not seen Ocean's 11. the ending completely surprises you and it is such a masterpiece you could watch it over and over. Ocean's twelve left me feeling like the whole thing was an inside joke that I missed. Pehaps I did. I was hoping for a more intricate piece but all I saw was fluff.
-
-
LeighM.Dec 15, 20042This Movie was so boring i just wanted to get up and leave! It is nothing like the first one! If you wanna go and see a good movie go and watch the Oceans 11!
-
-
AlexA.Dec 17, 20041This movie was very painfull to sit through. While Matt Damon was hilarious, the rest of the movie waned in disilusion with a terrible plot. I had been waiting for quite some time and it was a dissapointment.
-
-
DanijelD.Dec 18, 20043What a dissapointment, the movie ends up making a fool of itself with the excession of "stylish" scenes. The only thing that was heisted was the cinema-audience.
-
-
BobA.Dec 18, 20043
-
-
JosephH.Dec 22, 20042
-
-
RonKDec 23, 20043I was sucked in by the original and that with this cast, it couldn't be as bad as the critics were saying. But it is. What a waste of talent and 2&1/2 hours of my time.
-
-
JoeA.Dec 25, 20045
-
-
bryanDec 28, 20042
-
-
ThugThugNov 17, 20053One of the worst movies I have seen recently. Oceans 11 was good. This... is not.
-
-
ZinStarJan 12, 20052Just check it out when DVD come out, casue the $$ you spend in the cinema will be bteer donated to Tsunami Victim. Trus me I like big buff movie just for the HYPE of it, but this is worse then T3 and all the biggest flop that been out lately.
-
-
richarddJan 18, 20050This was a boring, contrived movie that couldn't hold itself together, and made little sense. What a disappointment after the original. Next time, they should have a script before shooting begins.
-
-
AnkarinoL.Jan 25, 20054So-so. They really lost something by not having Ted Griffin write the script. The storyline is incredibly convoluted, the actors are sleepwalking, and really the only pleasure is watching a rude Frenchman perform some Santa Cruz assembly-quality Capoeira through a laser field. I
-
-
CaptaincFeb 18, 20053Ho Humm.. Proves you should leave a good thing...or a relitive good thing, alone!
-
-
QuinnLFeb 18, 20058I liked it, a well done sequel to another well done film.
-
-
PrateekG.Feb 25, 20053One question: why? As fun as the first movie was, this wasn't. The plot stunk, the twist in the movie was horrible. I usually enjoy Pitt, Damon, Clooney, et al, but this was about as bad as Clooney's Batman movie.
-
-
TySMar 27, 20052Laura took the words out of my mouth.
-
-
BowenL.Apr 14, 20050Worst excuse for a movie I have ever seen. The star power never jells; they only smile when the receive their paychecks. Crap extordinare'.
-
-
MatthewA.May 12, 20055Good movie sort of thin plot to many stars plus you can't have julia roberts fake playing julia roberts.
-
-
JamesC.Dec 11, 20042
-
-
BitBurnDec 11, 20048Very good, More like 8.6/10. I don't understand why such average critics. For once I totally disagree with some reviewers. If you liked the first one, you will enjoy this one as well. A few flaws here and there but overall you'll get what you pay for guarantee.
-
-
GaborA.Dec 12, 20044The jokes are still here but the incoherent plot ruins everything. Actually better yet the otherwise terrible picture is somewhat elevated by amusing jokes. The problem with this set up is that i saw the movie about 2 hours ago and i cant remember a single joke. I saw the first one a year ago and the jokes are still fresh in my mind because they were imbedded in a rock solid script.
-
-
metacriticgirlDec 12, 20045The best part of the movie is hilarious Elliott Gould. And George Clooney is definitely easy on the eyes. Otherwise, very average.
-
-
beaum.Dec 13, 200461st one was way better.
-
-
DaddyGDec 15, 20049
-
-
ScottJDec 15, 20045This is a good mvie if you want to watch a stand up comedy where they make fun of each other and crack jokes. The plot has more holes then swiss chesse and non existent. A decent movie in terms of jokes and being funny, but the plot keeps this from being an awesome movie and reaching its potential.
-
-
JoeYDec 17, 20041Another one of those movies that revolve around rich self-absorbed celebrities involved in the generic get-rich heist movie plotline. It's just another attempt for hollywood to make themselves look better than everyone else in this celebrity lovefest.
-
-
RibberRibDec 19, 20044Good acteors, bad script, bad filming, bad story. If you need to reduce yourself to Julia Roberts having to play Julia Roberts, Oh my god.
-
-
Aug 16, 20108
-
Sep 12, 20107This movie has a interesting plot but it's very difficult to understand if you watch it for the first time. It definitely helps to watch Ocean's Eleven first.
The actors are succesful in bringing you the characters closer. -
Dec 18, 20112
-
Sep 7, 20115The story has become overly complex followed by trivial humor that was not necessary. Makes me remind myself if the director was the same guy that made 'Sex, Lies, and Videotape' and 'Traffic'.
-
Mar 29, 20127
-
Mar 24, 20135
-
Feb 4, 20137A sequel with little action that fails the first part, but it's still good.
-
63Even frothier and more frivolous than the first movie: It's a heist picture so laid-back and unconcerned, even the heist feels like an afterthought.
-
75As soon as it's over, and you find yourself back in the harsh light of the workaday world, you'll be hard-pressed to remember what happened. Except that you'll remember enjoying yourself - immensely.
-
75Isn't just a double whammy, it's a whammy squared - a goofy, stylish heist movie that'll steal moviegoers from other pictures.