- Studio: First Run Features
- Release Date: Feb 11, 2011
- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
83Broadly speaking, Canner hails from the Michael Moore school of first-person editorializing, but Orgasm Inc. isn't given to vanity or cheap shots.
-
80This must-see expose entertains as it horrifies.
-
75Canner is able to keep Orgasm Inc. trained on its eponymous theme with a brisk pace and precise detail that will be equally illuminating to men and women.
-
Mar 31, 201170Canner's deft exposé also makes clear that some of the highest-profile "experts" are shills for Big Pharma, and that genital mutilation is thriving in the West, in the form of cosmetic surgery.
-
70Canner's eye-opening, entertaining account of the search for the little pill that supplies the Big O is looney-tunes enough without the cartoon asides.
-
70Explores the link between female sexuality and corporate profits with a style that's as entertaining as it is revelatory.
-
70Although scattershot in its approach and relying a bit too heavily on cutesy animation, Orgasm Inc. is an eye-opening exposé.
-
60The film is a twisty and playful primer that suggests the best thing to do when beset with ugly forces is to publicly laugh them off. What happens in private is your business.
-
60Sometimes, the debunking is overshadowed by cringe-inducing graphics involving pills with little legs running toward a finish line.
-
Mar 31, 201150A compelling mess.
-
50Canner is either overwhelmed by so much impressive access to so many alarming business opportunities or lacking the investigative rigor to drive home the moral problems of these drugs and the existential problems of these women.
-
40Too scattered in its arguments and piecemeal in its sources to weave together a convincing institutional condemnation.
User Score
tbd
No user score yet- Awaiting 2 more ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 2 out of 2
-
Mixed: 0 out of 2
-
Negative: 0 out of 2
-
10
-
9