Generally favorable reviews - based on 12 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 7 out of 12
  2. Negative: 0 out of 12
  1. Reviewed by: Scott Tobias
    Feb 10, 2011
    Broadly speaking, Canner hails from the Michael Moore school of first-person editorializing, but Orgasm Inc. isn't given to vanity or cheap shots.
  2. Reviewed by: Ronnie Scheib
    Feb 7, 2011
    This must-see expose entertains as it horrifies.
  3. Reviewed by: Rene Rodriguez
    Feb 16, 2011
    Canner is able to keep Orgasm Inc. trained on its eponymous theme with a brisk pace and precise detail that will be equally illuminating to men and women.
  4. Reviewed by: Sheri Linden
    Mar 31, 2011
    Canner's deft exposé also makes clear that some of the highest-profile "experts" are shills for Big Pharma, and that genital mutilation is thriving in the West, in the form of cosmetic surgery.
  5. Reviewed by: Mark Jenkins
    Feb 15, 2011
    Canner's eye-opening, entertaining account of the search for the little pill that supplies the Big O is looney-tunes enough without the cartoon asides.
  6. Reviewed by: Jeannette Catsoulis
    Feb 10, 2011
    Explores the link between female sexuality and corporate profits with a style that's as entertaining as it is revelatory.
  7. Reviewed by: Frank Scheck
    Feb 10, 2011
    Although scattershot in its approach and relying a bit too heavily on cutesy animation, Orgasm Inc. is an eye-opening exposé.
  8. 60
    The film is a twisty and playful primer that suggests the best thing to do when beset with ugly forces is to publicly laugh them off. What happens in private is your business.
  9. Reviewed by: Joshua Rothkopf
    Feb 9, 2011
    Sometimes, the debunking is overshadowed by cringe-inducing graphics involving pills with little legs running toward a finish line.
  10. Reviewed by: David Lewis
    Mar 31, 2011
    A compelling mess.
  11. Reviewed by: Wesley Morris
    Mar 24, 2011
    Canner is either overwhelmed by so much impressive access to so many alarming business opportunities or lacking the investigative rigor to drive home the moral problems of these drugs and the existential problems of these women.
  12. Reviewed by: Nick Pinkerton
    Feb 9, 2011
    Too scattered in its arguments and piecemeal in its sources to weave together a convincing institutional condemnation.
User Score

No user score yet- Awaiting 2 more ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2 out of 2
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 2
  3. Negative: 0 out of 2
  1. Apr 21, 2011
    omg i have jerked off to this movie 37 times this week, its soo amazing when she orgasms lollololololololololo9lolo9lololol90olo.oloolololololololololololololo Full Review »
  2. Mar 5, 2011
    Important expose` of making "female sexual dysfunction" into a profitable business, told with humor and affection. Not unlike many other "illnesses" invented by the pharmaceutical and medical devices industries, products are being promoted with little evidence of efficacy upon an unsuspecting audience - American women - who are being told they are inadequate and thus need these products. Full Review »