Metascore
28

Generally unfavorable reviews - based on 9 Critics What's this?

User Score
6.8

Generally favorable reviews- based on 4 Ratings

Your Score
0 out of 10
Rate this:
  • 10
  • 9
  • 8
  • 7
  • 6
  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
  • 0
  • 0
Score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 9
  2. Negative: 7 out of 9
  1. Reviewed by: Chuck Bowen
    Jul 6, 2013
    63
    Wayne Kramer thankfully refuses to cloak his excessiveness in hedge-betting self-consciousness and the result is a gratifyingly disreputable B-movie blow out.
  2. Reviewed by: Glenn Whipp
    Jul 10, 2013
    40
    Kramer, 10 years removed from his lone critical success, "The Cooler," and writer Adam Minarovich aren't exactly aping Tarantino, if only because they don't have the talent or inclination to aim that high.
  3. Reviewed by: Roger Moore
    Jul 8, 2013
    38
    It’s coherent enough, but entirely too long and unpleasant when it could have been one brutishly edgy hoot after another.
  4. Reviewed by: Nick Schager
    Jul 9, 2013
    30
    Director Wayne Kramer (Running Scared, Crossing Over) makes plain his cartoon-comedy intentions early and often via comic-book-panel-style title cards. The presiding atmosphere of over-the-top zaniness, however, is of a broad, banal sort involving little people, rampant nudity, and quasi-religious nonsense.
  5. Reviewed by: Frank Scheck
    Jul 10, 2013
    30
    Despite its noteworthy cast who presumably had some time to fill between better gigs, this is the sort of instantly disposable B-movie effort that Quentin Tarantino would have chucked in the wastebasket after a first draft.
  6. Reviewed by: Nathan Rabin
    Jul 11, 2013
    20
    The film doesn’t feel like a fresh riff on familiar tropes so much as a bad cover of Pulp Fiction.
  7. Reviewed by: Gabe Toro
    Jul 11, 2013
    16
    It’s all very first draft, with a layer of supernatural permeating the events that suggests added attempts to connect three wildly disparate storylines.

See all 9 Critic Reviews

Score distribution:
  1. Positive: 2 out of 2
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 2
  3. Negative: 0 out of 2
  1. Jul 20, 2013
    8
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Despite critics reviews, the movie totally makes sense. It's all about perspective. The main idea is that one cannot go out of his boundaries and what life gives him is what he deserves. The psycho-husband who wants justice all for his own benefit, ends tragically, killed by his own goal. The greedy ones, impersonated by meth-addicts, get killed by their aim having all, ignoring the consequences of their acts. And "The King", left alone and dumped by his own material life, leaves himself in the hands of faith the moralizing end. The purpose of this movie is to scream out loud that some things must be left how they are. All those philosophic ideas, mixed-up with a great cast, create maybe one of the greatest stories of this decade. A bit sloppy here and there, but hey, you can't please everybody as well as nobody can be pleased enough. (I'm really sorry for my bad English, it's not my native language and I have a hard time learning it) Expand
  2. Aug 7, 2013
    8
    The critics hated it but I dug it. I liked the cast, the disturbing and very strange story and the character, despite being awful, terrible people, were entertaining in their own, unique way. And how often are you going to see pretty boy Paul Walker as a racist moron? Expand