Advanced Search Beta »
Basic Search Fields
Philadelphia
User Score
7.8 out of 10

Generally favorable reviews- based on 26 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 23 out of 26
  2. Mixed: 3 out of 26
  3. Negative: 0 out of 26

Review this movie

  1. Your Score
    10 out of 10
    Rate this:
    out of 10
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling

  3. Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000

view
per page
  1. Rusty
    May 18, 2010
    9
    This is a touching movie on a topic that at the time was swept to the background by society and the media. Demme et al were very brave to make this movie and will certainly stand the test of time for the way it is made and the issues that it tackles.
    • 1 of 1 users said yes
  2. Rumblebeelove
    Nov 6, 2011
    9
    This movie has raw emotion and stellar performances from all of the actors involved. The subject matter is carried firmly and pulls no punches with the sadness that AIDS brings into people's lives. See this for Tom Hanks' amazing transformation, but also for Denzel Washington who's character has flaws and is perhaps the most realistic personification in the entire production.
  3. CritiqueGirl
    Mar 2, 2011
    4
    This movie was the beginning of the end for me going to the movies regularly. For such a serious drama it sure didn't make sense in that the ACLU didn't take the case. Please. With Tom Hanks in the witness chair I was saying to myself, "Just have him show the lesions." And so it happened. I hate knowing what will happen or what should happen. When the lights came up in the theater, everyone was sitting their silently and looking at one another puzzled and they were no doubt saying to one another what we were: "That movie stunk. Who said it was any good. It didn't make sense." And we are from Philadelphia. Not that the title had anything to do with the movie except it was set in Philadelphia. Over the years my movie going has tapered off to the point that I can go years without going to the movies. Then I go and never want to go again.… Expand
  4. TonyB.
    Jul 1, 2008
    5
    Generally well-paced and extremely well-acted but intellectually and emotionally dishonest.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  5. JayH.
    Sep 23, 2009
    8
    Very powerful drama, beautifully and sensitively acted by Tom Hanks. Fine supporting cast. It's a sad film, but it doesn't leave the viewer depressed. Good direction and screenplay, well photographed and an excellent score.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  6. ERG1008
    Sep 3, 2010
    6
    Successful Lawyer contracts AIDS, his company then fire him for other reasons but an unfair dismissal claim brings out the truth. Well, I was a little disappointed with the film in general. Thought it should have had more background on Beckett so you got to know the character better. Instead it rushed along then straight to the old tearjerker ending, complete with video footage as a kid, etc. Denzel Washington stood out however with a great performance as Joe Miller. I agree with the people who says that Hanks' character was "underwritten & incomplete".… Expand
  7. jimmytancredi
    May 29, 2011
    7
    It's a good movie. It should reveal the fact that some characters are caricatured as defense attorney, the exaggeration of torture by which the character of Tom Hanks is in court, among other things. It is even more important It and relevant all the context of prejudices that come behind AIDS and a host of problems that are well discussed. The disease, when discovered and known to few in the 1980s, fit in socially the gays in a kneecap perverse and that still remains in the heads closer. That is the importance of the film.… Expand
prev next
Page:
  • 1

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
66 out of 100

Generally favorable reviews - based on 21 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 15 out of 21
  2. Mixed: 5 out of 21
  3. Negative: 1 out of 21
  1. The New York Times
    Reviewed by: Janet Maslin
    70
    In the end, thanks to such effects and to the simple grace of Mr. Hanks's performance, this film does accomplish what it means to. Philadelphia rises above its flaws to convey the full urgency of its difficult subject, and to bring that subject home.
    Read full review
  2. Chicago Sun-Times
    Reviewed by: Roger Ebert
    88
    And yet Philadelphia is quite a good film, on its own terms. And for moviegoers with an antipathy to AIDS but an enthusiasm for stars like Tom Hanks and Denzel Washington, it may help to broaden understanding of the disease.
    Read full review
  3. ReelViews
    Reviewed by: James Berardinelli
    88
    The story is timely and powerful, and the performances of Hanks and Washington assure that the characters will not immediately vanish into obscurity.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »