1. JoeyK.

   7

   Perhaps I watched this movie in the wrong mindset, but I think people are a little hard on it as an effective documentary and social commentary. People are right about it's fuzzy focus and lack of a real driven point, but I didn't look to the movie for that. It was on TV one night, i hadn't heard of ti, and I watched it. And it was interesting. It was very informing about what kind of people have what kind of ideas about Jews out there. Of course, I'm not stupid enough to think that the film implies that they're in the majority, but learning about the radicals out there was at the very least, interesting. That's what the film was, interesting and informative. It didn't propose any solutions or make any big points, and it didn't try to. Not a perfect film, but interesting and worthwhile.… Expand

   • Helpful?

     0 of 0 users said yes
2. JanetteY.

   5

   The film loses its message by relying too much on quotes and actions of a choice of randomly thrown-in, anti-social nutheads whose sanity ought to be questioned than worthy of arguing with. There is nothing in the film that reveals any real physical dangers these warped individuals had actually committed. Marc Levin ridicules this film further by the way he charges at the nutheads and create oral chaos with his condescending arguments and tantrums. This film does poorly to resonate the danger of anti -semitism creeping in our midst.It leaves me , at its finale, feeling exhausted, giddy and cynical.… Expand

   • Helpful?

     0 of 0 users said yes
3. JimG.

   3

   I was very disappointed in this movie. I went in thinking it would be a piece of expose journalism that convinces the viewer by simply laying out facts. Instead, it came across as a very personal and apologetic piece. If all of the people who believe the protocols are real happen to be wacko, as Levin apparently suggests in the selection of his on-screen adversaries, then what is the point of the movie? Those who discredit the protocols are on film by Levin; those who apparently believe in the protocols are on film by someone else, except for a handful of people on the fringe. Did Levin not want to confront people of the same caliber on the other side of the story? Did he try to interview them? It isn't clear. Also, unfortunately Levin brushes away, rather than addresses to a reasonable conclusion, the story of Israelis who were arrested and deported following 9/11 (I can't remember from the film what exactly happened, other than Levin saying something to the effect "while the situation is unclear, don't jump to conclusions." I guess what is most disappointing to me is that I walked away from the film with more questions than answers. Levin has "Michael Moore'd" his own message--that is, undermined the credibility of his message by APPEARING biased through making the story so personal, seeming selective in facts, and failing to confront the more clever of his adversaries. He has played into the hand of the conspiracy theorists. That is just sad.… Expand

   • Helpful?

     0 of 0 users said yes

See all 4 User Reviews