- Studio: DreamWorks Distribution
- Release Date: Jul 12, 2002
User Score
7.5
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 98 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 79 out of 98
-
Mixed: 11 out of 98
-
Negative: 8 out of 98
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
NikoOct 3, 20022Yep; great shots, camera just smoothly scrolls and zooms/focuses. and that's it. mare boredom of saying "daddy i luv you". watch the godfather again if you want this message of respect in decent way or read the puzo's book. skip this movie.
-
-
ChadS.Jul 13, 20024
-
-
SteveJul 13, 20024Ponderous and boring with characters popping up unexpectedly. Very well acted. Beautifully photographed (some shots appear to be choreographed) with very rich atmosphere, it's the kind of film that is going to be seriously overated. Stick to "Bonnie and Clyde".
-
-
SeamousS.Jul 22, 20023Self important, unconvincing, predictable. Jude Law was the only one worth watching in this. Miller's Crossing by the Cohen Bros is about a hundred times better than this waste of time.
-
-
PatC.Jan 5, 20044It's a cautionary tale: If you're naughty, you might live a boring pointless life then get shot. But not soon enough.
-
-
KevinR.Jul 12, 20024A lot of shooting and driving, but not much else going on here. None of the action sequences develop any sort of momentum, and in the serious moments no one seems to have much of anything to say. This movie was so thin and uncompelling it made me desperate to see Goodfellas.
-
-
AllanAug 4, 20023The most overrated movie of the year. It's both boring and implausible. The relationship portrayed are superficial. It provides yet another reason not to trust the critics.
-
-
CriticalByNatureFeb 24, 20032
-
-
JRApr 5, 20030Particularly artless, guileless, and needlessly protracted, this dud of a film mistakes being drawn-out for suspenseful, tinkly piano music for art, and atmospheric shot for heart. It lacks heart, lacks any sense of realism, fails to engage on any level, and is, without a doubt, one of the most disappointing and insipidly boring pieces of drivel I have seen in many years.
-
-
BillC.Oct 11, 20053This film should have been better and it could have been.The Jude Law charactor is a waste,the screen writer should have stayed closer to the novel.Hanks and Newman were both up to the task and their talents were largely wasted.Read the novel,it's a much better story. It's a good example of someone pushing the art of film making while botching the story within the film.Bill C.
-
-
ChadS.Sep 21, 20020
-
-
[Anonymous]Mar 27, 20032This movie is so dull and boring. There's no suspense, not much action, and no reason to care about the characters. Yes, the cinematography is great and so is the music, but that doesn't make it enjoyable.
-
-
80Results are classy entertainment with little to interest women viewers but very shrewdly and cleverly put together, and probably more rewarding in long-range terms if you invest in Fox or Dreamworks than if you actually see the movie.
-
100Overflowing with melancholy and tragedy, Road to Perdition is one of the most somber gangster pictures ever made.
-
50On screen, Road to Perdition becomes a lace-curtain shoot-'em-up about fathers and sons. The graphic novel is more kinetic and more powerful than the motion picture.