Advanced Search Beta »
Basic Search Fields
Rounders
User Score
8.0 out of 10

Generally favorable reviews- based on 25 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 21 out of 25
  2. Mixed: 3 out of 25
  3. Negative: 1 out of 25

Review this movie

  1. Your Score
    10 out of 10
    Rate this:
    out of 10
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling

  3. Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000

view
per page
  1. CosmoK.
    Jan 9, 2005
    10
    Probably one of the best movies i have ever seen...
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  2. ChrisP.
    Sep 20, 2005
    10
    Awesome!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  3. JohnB.
    Sep 20, 2005
    10
    The greatest movie about poker.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  4. JackD.
    Dec 23, 2002
    5
    Some OK bits but overall it's limp and not convincing at all.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  5. PaulH
    Aug 4, 2005
    6
    It's alright, but it doesn't all the way work, you have to pretty much be really into poker to like this movie, so that's a bad thing. unlike say Sideways, where you don't have to give a damn about wine to enjoy that film, that's just one example of what i'm talking about.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  6. AppleH.
    Aug 12, 2002
    10
    Greatest movie ever. If this doesn't get you pumped up to go gamble and win, I don't know what will. Classic!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  7. ChrisP.
    Mar 6, 2005
    10
    Awesome!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  8. SeanF.
    Apr 29, 2006
    9
    The critics were mostly off on this one, I don't know the movies it is supposedly a knockoff of, but I think this movie's awesome. I don't play poker, and I think it's great, I would think any poker player would think it's sick!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  9. GaborA.
    Jul 17, 2006
    3
    As typical of a movie you can make about card playing. A ninth grader selected at random and told to write a movie about poker would come up with a script very similar to this film. Rounders see's all the angle's but doesn't have the courage to make a move.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  10. pgmark
    Dec 16, 2010
    5
    Good movie but flawed here and there. Matt Damon is solid but not top shelf here. John M lol ... terrible accent yet i still loved his performance. Edward N is so so. Best thing about this movie.... Nice to see a card movie again. Average score
  11. gkbos1
    Apr 13, 2012
    9
    done really well for its story line. I really liked the acting and the cast. thanks
prev next
Page:
  • 1

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
54 out of 100

Mixed or average reviews - based on 32 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 14 out of 32
  2. Mixed: 15 out of 32
  3. Negative: 3 out of 32
  1. Salon.com
    Reviewed by: Stephanie Zacharek
    40
    Neither Dahl nor most of his actors ever quite convince us that there's a good reason to sit in front of a movie screen watching them for more than two hours.
    Read full review
  2. TV Guide
    Reviewed by: Maitland McDonagh
    60
    Richly atmospheric but a little thin in the character department: It feels oddly truncated, despite nicely textured performances.
    Read full review
  3. The New York Times
    Reviewed by: Elvis Mitchell
    80
    Mischievously entertaining...Dahl's film has character in oversupply even if its actual characters are sometimes thin. Poker fever makes up for whatever the story lacks in everyday emotions.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »