- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
38Its pleasures are slight and fleeting, and so many movies have done what it does, and done it much better, that there's nothing to get even remotely excited about - much less to draw audiences into theaters.
-
30Paramount Pictures proudly informs us that the PG rating is for “mild, crude humor.” Too mild, too crude by far. If I were you, I’d take the wee ones and run for the vastly superior “Finding Nemo.”
-
30Rugrats Go Wild! represents one giant leap forward for corporate cartoon synergy, but one similarly large step back for the Rugrats franchise.
-
30There is little here to hold the attention of anyone older than 9. For families in search of entertainment, it may be time to find Nemo again.
-
30Screechily abrasive and sorely lacking in elements that engage the imagination.
-
30The exuberance of the Rugrats seems nullified by the effete quirkiness of the Thornberrys.
-
This frantic sequel finds the diaper-obsessed heroes and their foolish parents marooned on a desert island, where they encounter the family from a more charming Nickelodeon cartoon.
-
25The exception is Willis as Spike. He's got more energy than the rest of the cast combined.
-
20As matinee probations go, the movie's tainted by too many bad songs and too much of Bruce Willis.
-
12It's an uncoordinated, flailing hodgepodge of music videos, chases, crashes and moronic plot twists.
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 3 out of 6
-
Mixed: 1 out of 6
-
Negative: 2 out of 6
-
10it was sad in a few scenes but it was wort it ........................................................................................................
-
10
-
5