Rugrats Go Wild
User Score
4.7 out of 10

Mixed or average reviews- based on 18 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 8 out of 18
  2. Mixed: 3 out of 18
  3. Negative: 7 out of 18

Review this movie

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. ChelseaN.
    Nov 3, 2003
    8
    This movie is very funny, and it very interesting too. This movie is even better than Rugrats in Paris!!!!
  2. MichM.
    Jun 11, 2004
    0
    It was stupid it didn't even make me laugh.
  3. Rugratslover
    Jan 28, 2006
    0
    10 reasons why this movie sucks: 1. bad animation 2. horrible sound 3. stupid gimmick 4. pointless plot 5. bad voice talents 6. Bruce Willis 7. boring climax 8. stupid resolution 9. I always knew what was going to happen next. 10. Bad idea for a movie. Need I say more???
  4. Zilcell
    May 29, 2012
    5
    A step down from the first sequel, Rugrats go Wild is exactly its namesake. The plot is wild and it really gets out of hand. A crossover between Rugrats and Wild Thornberrys could have been a little better executed.
  5. madonnarules
    Aug 26, 2012
    10
    if you thought the first rugrats was the best in the series then you haven't seen this and the rugrats in paris one cause you have no idea what your missing out.
  6. moviefan11
    Aug 28, 2012
    10
    it was sad in a few scenes but it was wort it ........................................................................................................

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
38 out of 100

Generally unfavorable reviews - based on 27 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 6 out of 27
  2. Mixed: 11 out of 27
  3. Negative: 10 out of 27
  1. The A.V. Club
    Reviewed by: Nathan Rabin
    30
    Rugrats Go Wild! represents one giant leap forward for corporate cartoon synergy, but one similarly large step back for the Rugrats franchise.
    Read full review
  2. The Globe and Mail (Toronto)
    Reviewed by: Jennie Punter
    50
    Too wildly ambitious in its goal to unite two powerful TV tribes to serve a common goal, but its unsentimental music (hip songs by Devo's Mark Mothersbaugh) and visual delights will capture the imagination of young and old.
    Read full review
  3. Christian Science Monitor
    Reviewed by: David Sterritt
    75
    Don't expect much from the scratch-and-sniff "odorama" gimmick; the mischievous John Waters set a higher standard for that novelty in "Polyester" (1981).
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »