- Studio: Warner Bros. Pictures
- Release Date: Dec 25, 2005
User Score
4.2
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 49 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 16 out of 49
-
Mixed: 7 out of 49
-
Negative: 26 out of 49
Review this movie
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
BillD.Jan 1, 20067
-
-
AHDec 26, 20050Downright awful... this movie went from dry to creepy and then to pathetic. Really, don't even bother watching it when it is shown on tv in a year. This movie was downright horrible. Jennifer Aniston's worst performance ever.
-
-
NigelWJan 10, 20065A reasonably good film, it held my attention and didn't fundamentally offend me. There were some laugh out loud moments, mainly thanks to Shirley MacLaine. Jennifer Aniston played herself admirably. Just let down by the predictable ending.
-
-
KGJan 12, 20062Waste of time. Our group's opinions ranged from forgettable to worst movie of the year so far.
-
-
MarkB.Jan 3, 20063
-
-
RichardGDec 29, 20056Enjoyable to watch. Anniston, Costner and McLaine are so good that I liked it in spite of the lack of a competent script and the presence of a non-actor (Mark Rufalo) as a main character. Could have been a really smart movie, but it feels like the studio "script doctors" have been at it again. About 500 times better fare than "The Family Stone."
-
-
TonydannieDec 31, 20055Here is a movie I was looking forward to seeing. It had an iteresting idea. What Happened? Well, I am still trying to figure it out. It's not that the movie was boring. It had its good moments and its bad moments. It was slow, but watchable. However, Would I recomend goingto see this at the big Screen......? No! This one is more of a DVD stay At home NIght Rental.
-
-
ChrisBDec 31, 20058Cute movie... good entertainment.
-
-
JeffSDec 30, 20051I'll summarize how awfl this movie is by simply saying that my wife (a big Aniston fan) apologized to me for having to sit through it and is going to let me pick the next two movies in return.
-
-
SendianJan 1, 20060Sucked. No point of the movie. What is the point of knowing that one man slept with a grand mother, mother and grand daugther? doesn't teach any thing. Very slow and boring
-
-
RobinP.Jan 1, 20062My husband and I wasted our gift certificate on this one...what a bore. It was a lame vehicle for Jennifer Aniston's hair more than her ability to act. The premise of the story was so weak that not even the actors seemed convinced. Awful.
-
-
DannyR.Sr.Jan 1, 20062Boring and pointless movie. I only gave it a total of 2; 1 for Shirley McLaine's hilarious performance and 1 for Jennifer Aniston just being so darn nice to look at!
-
-
billys.Jan 2, 20061"Mrs. Robinson, you're trying to lobotomize me."
-
-
[Anonymous]Oct 9, 20062I've never seen The Graduate but my instincts tell me that this movie is a lackluster spin-off and should in no way represent the original.
-
-
BrittanyM.Feb 7, 200610girls will enjoy this movie. I thought it was very funny. Me and my girl friend went and saw it without guys and we had a blast! I would definitely see it again.
-
-
LarryT.Apr 17, 20061A real dud. They took a decent premise and turned into a sitcom that lasted an hour and a half.
-
-
LeroyDec 24, 20050Sucked!
-
-
S.H.Dec 25, 20051Crappy movie with a hideous plotline.
-
-
MarcD.Dec 26, 20054A decent film wrecked by horrible pacing. What's up, Marty DeBergi? There's a fine line between stupid and clever, and you're on the wrong side of it with this one. You wasted fine performances by Shirley & Kevin, but I don't honestly know if this one was ever destined for a green score with that sreenplay anyway.
-
-
TomHDec 27, 20051Stupid to say the least. Lame plot to start with followed by shallow acting. Dissapointed in Aniston and Costner more times than not is overrated. Did all the actors, director, etc. really want to do this movie?? Didn't seem like it to me.
-
-
KathyS.Jan 16, 20067Enjoyed every minute of it. Perfectly cast throughout with good performances, especially from Shirley Maclaine, Marc Ruffalo, Kevin Costner, and Richard Jenkins.
-
-
MatthewFeb 11, 20068a movie with alot charm thanks to Aniston and Costner... Rob Riner delivers a nice romantic comedy.
-
-
RhettW.Dec 28, 20053Never lives up to the clever premise. The characters aren't real and the laughs are scarce.
-
-
JohnL.Dec 31, 20051Terrible. Weak script, blase acting. Costner put nothing into it; Aniston not much better. Shirley MacLaine fizzles in yet one more movie portrayal as an over the hill matron.
-
prev
next
Page:
- 1
-
60Aniston gets marooned here: Her comic instincts are muted by all the identity angst, yet there isn't sufficient dramatic material into which she can sink her teeth. Costner strolls through this role with disarming ease.
-
50As muddled in most respects as its title, Rumor Has It... begins with an intriguing premise...but it devolves into a bland romance spiced with too little comedy.
-
10Stay away: Everything about the movie is rinky-dink, from its phony, lifeless dialogue to its drab, shabby sitcom look to its choppy editing, all of which can wear on you after 95 minutes that come to feel like an eternity.