User Score
5.6
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 128 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 73 out of 128
-
Mixed: 8 out of 128
-
Negative: 47 out of 128
Review this movie
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
Sep 21, 20113My god...I can't believe they dragged a brilliant film into a **** up franchise with exaggerated Cliches and preposterous plot twists. "Saw 5", a disgusting movie filled with 'gore' but no 'horror', precisely proves my statement. You have to stop your game, Jigsaw. It's not scary anymore
-
Nov 8, 201010This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
SeanA.Nov 3, 20083A thriller/horror that does not thrill nor horrify. Dull story and you'd probably fall asleep in the middle with too much unnecessary flashbacks and not enough gore to boot.
-
-
ChelseaC.Nov 6, 20083I don' t know if anyone else noticed this in their viewing of this movie, but you could see the microphones they use to hear the actors. It was hanging down the entire movie, and the shots were always off-center. Poor production from a movie I expect a lot from. And the story was completely lost in this. They should have stopped at 3.
-
-
RolandG.Oct 24, 200810Classic Saw movie better then Saw 4. Storyline is awesome loved it.
-
-
AndrewH.Oct 25, 200810This movie was so awesome. It was as good as the first and second film. I definitely recommend it to anyone who liked the previous saws. however it wasn't perfect, because they did leave some loose ends. Thats probably because of saw 6 next year! I can't wait!!!
-
-
EddieD.Oct 25, 20087
-
-
AustinB.Oct 25, 20086
-
-
JustinS.Oct 25, 20089Okay, this is probably the worst case of " The critics hate it, the audience loves it" I've ever seen. Sure there really isnt much of a twist but overall, the movie was pretty damn good. Much better than Saw IV. I'd probably rank it either 2nd or third.
-
-
GretchenSOct 25, 20084Do you honestly expect this movie to have a high rating? C'mon, it's Saw.. It's more like a cult following. Surely nobody's expecting an Oscar winning performance.
-
-
JoshuaL.Oct 26, 200810I understand that this series always gets a bad review but I personally LOVED it. This addition to the series is full of crazy twists and keeps you wondering all the way through.
-
-
JohnSmithOct 27, 20080Truly a waste of time and money, friend convinced me to go and see it with her, waste of time.
-
-
AlecBousquetOct 27, 20083
-
-
RemingtonWOct 27, 20089
-
-
IANWILKINSONOct 28, 200810
-
-
DanT.Oct 29, 200810Cannot believe some people didn't like this! So funny! I was actually hurting, I laughed so much. Beginning to end, not one unfunny moment. Brilliant! Best Comedy I've seen!
-
-
SebastienL.Oct 29, 20089All of SAW sequel is not comparable to Friday the 13th or Halloween or even less Nightmare on Elm Street. This is way much better, the writers of these movies are amazing (you gotta be a bit crazy but...) I hope that they go at least up to SAW #10. Its a shame that Jigsaw is dead !!!
-
-
ChrisK.Mar 1, 20097Are these movies starting to get disgusting and to similar.
-
-
JackH.Nov 19, 20087Saw V was not the strongest in the series or the weakest. It was more sick than any of the others. It could of been a bit better with some of the traps. At leased two or three of the traps were just pointless, Strahms head box trap was brilliant, the pendulum is my favorite out of the whole series. It was a good movie but could of been made into something great.
-
-
BrianP.Nov 2, 200810
-
-
ToddS.Nov 2, 20081
-
-
JackieB.Nov 3, 20087Knowing the prequels really made this much more enjoyable than its meta-rating!!
-
-
SandipP.Nov 6, 20089I watched it yesterday and found it a wicked film, you need to watch all of them to get into it. The only part that put it slightly down is why the old man, the FBI agent was running around everywhere, when srath died anyway.
-
-
DarziePDec 1, 20089
-
-
RossH.Oct 24, 200810I actually really enjoyed this (I always assume the worst from sequels as usually they go downhill and die). Like Lowe said, the pieces didn't com together completely, but it doesn't really diminish the fact that there are a LOT of loose ends from previous in the series that are tied together now.
-
-
BryceW.Oct 24, 20088The Movies storyline was right on!!! I loved the movie, but was not to thrilled with the ending! Also it leaves you hanging on what happens with that Mrs. Tuck ladie??? Overall i think it was better then the other saws.. So yes i recommend everyone to check out this movie at least once
-
-
LoweE.Oct 24, 20087good movie but with no twist!where is the ending?in the end all the pieces don't come anywhere near being put together.
-
-
MatthewR.Oct 24, 20082
-
-
EileenB.Oct 25, 20083Zzzzz oh,it's over. Damn, I could have used a longer nap. BORING, and a waste of $11. Should have stopped after the third one.
-
-
MarcoM.Oct 25, 20087Decent movie, especially for the die hard Saw fan but the film was way to short and half of it was flashbacks to 3-4. It had a pretty good Storyline though, expliaining Hoffman's involvement. Ending was decent although i would have chosen a differnt one. I think Saw 4 and 5 or 5 and 6 could probably be combined into one movie but where seperated for purposes of financial gain.
-
-
ChadS.Oct 25, 20080
-
-
ACOct 25, 20087I enjoyed it for what it was having seen the previous films. The flashbacks were a bit hectic but it told me what it needed too.
-
-
D.S.U.Oct 25, 20088Not a masterpiece, but better than the last two and a solid, smart continuation of the franchise with gore to spare. No big twist as promised (though the final scene is freaky), but entertaining nonetheless.
-
-
AnonymousOct 26, 20080
-
-
RobDentOct 27, 20081The scariest part about this movie was me knowing i couldn't get a refund, The HORROR!!!!! It was that bad. Sloppy job of putting everything together and loopholes everywhere.
-
-
IvelinMatevOct 27, 200810great movie!
-
-
ChetSavageOct 27, 20087Alright.
-
-
BillyJoeOct 27, 200810Kick ass movie.
-
-
CoreyOct 28, 20088Hey! Anybody that hasn't seen saw 1-4 cannot say anything about saw 5. Of course you didn't like it. Saw 5 spends its time explaning saw 1-4. If you went to the movie theater just tio see people get fu*ked up. then go watch an edited verision of just people getting killed. But, if you want to see a complicated story unfold then saw 5 is your best bet.
-
-
SawnoM.Jan 10, 20090Saw 1 and 3 were great, (i personally prefer three) saw 2 was alright, but saw 4 was pretty bad. by saw 4 they were making shit up and production values were getting lower. But by saw five... well lets just say it was MORTIFYING.
-
-
JessicaS.Jan 13, 20092
-
-
mauriciol.Jan 22, 20096Ok , if u have seen all the others u have to see this one ,. i really liked it. and it really gives a concluicion to all of the otthers.
-
-
IvelinMatevDec 29, 200910great movie!
-
-
danieldanielJan 25, 20090saw is the most disgusting thing ever,how can any of you saw saw 1-4 are the best is it nice watching others get tortured, i know it is only a movie but a movie represents something i am not saying dont watch em but still you cant say they give you anything you to learn
-
-
DiegoL.Jan 5, 20094It was a disapointment... "Saw IV" was pretty good and surprised me. This one is confusing. There's no more history to tell, and they already making things up.
-
-
GregC.Nov 16, 20081Four was pushing it. Five is too much- this movie was unbearable to watch and was a complete waste of an afternoon, which I will never get back.
-
-
KendraP.Nov 17, 20084i have to agree with the critics! I;m sorry but saw was very sloppy the ending was terrible... the should've stopped after the real jigsaw died!!! I mean way to pull some messed up character out of your ass... and a cop! and put him as the lead!
-
-
EdgarV.Nov 26, 20081
-
-
R.G.Nov 5, 20082
-
-
AronJ.Dec 1, 20080The first saw was amazing, everyone after become progressively worse, and five is as bad as it gets. The acting was horrid, the production was horrid, as well with every other aspect
-
-
AndyR.Oct 23, 20084Completely mediocre in every way.
-
-
JonathanC.Oct 24, 20089Oh my god, i have just come back from seeing this film and all have to say is the critics need to stop slating films that are sequels. channel 4's own vortex gave this movie 1 out of 5???? i question if he had seen this film. go see it nuff said.
-
-
xyzxyzOct 24, 20080DON'T SEE THIS MOVIE! It's only out to make money and NOT to tell a good story. There are no surprises, nothing new, there is NO point other than to get your $10 dollars. Don't see it.
-
-
GavinA.Oct 24, 20082The gruesomeness of saw still remains, but this seems more of a B-Movie rip off of what was once a decent series of movies, the acting is sub par as is the story and ending
-
-
RyanSOct 24, 20088
-
-
AndrewB.Oct 24, 20088
-
-
SpenceK.Oct 24, 20087It was a good movie and clever like all the other SAW movies, but without the original jigsaw the movie doesn't seem as exciting. The movie also doesn't lacks a cliffhanger ending that all the other movies made great use of.
-
-
MichaelB.Oct 24, 20082Wicked awesome Saw V is super-cool this is a run-on sentence I can't find the period key what's going on somebody please stop me... Sorry, I went into a Roland G.-like frenzy there. No, but seriously, the movie is awful. You're better off spending an afternoon knitting a nice sweater.
-
-
MattKOct 25, 20083
-
-
MattGOct 27, 20086If you pay to see this movie, you'll get exactly what you expect: a terrible plot, gore, and plenty of laughable moments. Don't take it seriously and you'll have a good time.
-
-
GeorgeMOct 27, 20085
-
-
JamesCurentonOct 27, 200810
-
-
JayHJan 18, 20093Unpleasant people doing extremely unpleasant things. My, what fun! Extremely gory and nasty, not much of a plot. The acting is fair. Pointless.
-
-
TimEJan 31, 20090I've seen all the Saw movies and this one was really weak. The plot was sort of nothing, the "game" itsself was really short. I think this series is done.
-
-
Nov 21, 20102Fails explicitly to live up to the success of the third, the franchise has now tumbled into what it was trying to avoid to be in the first place - pure, narcissistic blood-gushing torture porn. The moral of the story is now overlooked and almost neglected, and each scene is all about wanting to please the mentally-unstable gore fans.
-
Aug 23, 20104The fifth installment in the Saw series. Again this is similar to the fourth one where it relies on flashbacks to link up the story so nothing really new. One or two nice traps again but the acting is dreadful. The tag line was "You won't believe how it ends" & it should have been "You won't believe how bad the acting is".
-
Oct 19, 20106it won't bring new fans to the franchise, but Saw V is definitely worth a try.
-
Nov 25, 20118It was actualyl rather fine, Probably one of the best in the series. Solid acting by the cast, Traps that didnt just focus on violence but really the idea of actual vengence and paying retribution towards the wrongs that the people in the traps commited. It ended perfectly imo.
-
May 22, 20118
-
Dec 5, 20118Actually pretty good, Finally a film that focused more on acting then on horror. David Hackl did a wonderful job as director and its a shame he didnt do anymore films. The acting was good and the leads were great. The traps were not that scary (the final one was though) but it had a greater overall meaning then pretty much any other trap in the series. Overall it was pretty good.
-
Feb 9, 20128
prev
next
Page:
- 1
-
20This year's installment is as disappointing as a Halloween bag filled with nothing but raisins.
-
20By-the-numbers retread.
-
25Devotes so much time and energy to flashbacks and recycling footage from its predecessors that it threatens to implode.