- Studio: New Line Cinema
- Release Date: Sep 22, 1995
User Score
8.2
out of 10
Universal acclaim- based on 142 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 126 out of 142
-
Mixed: 7 out of 142
-
Negative: 9 out of 142
Review this movie
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
Sep 22, 20119"Se7en" is a disturbing movie because of everything the movie pertains. From powerful performances by Freeman and Pitt to the creepy Spacey, the dialogue was also a intelligently written one too. Although the story may be hard to follow or understand, "Se7en" is a masterpiece, the godfather of all crime thrillers.
-
PatrickSJul 22, 200910The word "classic" is overused, but if the gumshoe fits... Not for the faint-hearted, but if you can handle the graphic material, you will be rewarded. Fincher, Freeman, and Pitt at the top of their game, and my favorite third-act of any film. Inventive, disturbing, brilliant.
-
-
RirenJan 31, 20074
-
-
ZachRAug 5, 200910Well then alex, maybe you should accept the fact that not everybody puts the plot before the blood! we noticed the lack of story, but we DIDN'T CARE, because we LIKE the blood enough to forgive it i rate this a 10 because i loved it, so go sit on a flagpole.
-
-
Feb 1, 20110One of the best films of the 90s.Thrilling,outstanding with beautiful perfomances by Brad Pitt and Morgan Freeman.It's really disgusting,blood packed but it doesn't fail to impress with its well crafted and clever plot.A real classic!
-
Jan 27, 20128A true original. Great acting from Pitt; probably the role that launched him into the bigshot he is today. The whole thing is creepy. It's not meant to be Saw. Man, people are dumb.
-
MathiasNov 8, 200310A masterpiece! In an industry where sperm in a woman's hair is considered clever, David Fincher brings back the classic film noir in an unsettling, powerful way. One the finest films EVER made and one of the finest directors working today.
-
-
KeithE.Sep 20, 20039A great serial killer movie. The perp in the crimes uses deadly sins to act out his crimes. His identity is a mystery only to be revealed in the final scenes of the film, but the killer becomes interesting quickly. Some of the gore scenes went a little far, so I gave it lost a ranking for that. Otherwise, a fabulous movie.
-
-
RudieApr 29, 20058A thrilling movie that raises questions about morality and sin. Although the concept is not original it Seven manages to present a unique, philosophical spin on evil. Unlike other films belonging to the same genre, it does not depend on blood and gore to create suspence and keep the viewer intrigued.
-
-
IgorV.Feb 5, 200810The Best what I seen before.
-
-
MartinOct 28, 200210
-
-
SombreroMar 4, 200310
-
-
JohnG.Feb 9, 20059One of the most unsettling neo-noir movies I have seen in recent times. Excellent!!
-
-
RDalviMar 19, 20067Certainly not dull but is incredibly slow. Some sequences test your patience. But good performances and a surprise end succeed in keeping your interest. Spacey is brilliant in his small role as John Doe. Morgan freeman gives a great performance and Brad pitt is cool. Gwyneth Paltrow is sexy as well as gives a good performance.
-
-
FlachE.Jul 9, 200610This Movie Rocks. Even after having seen it many times, it still gives me the chills. The plot sucks you in, eventually causing transference onto the character... pull the trigger.
-
-
JaredC.Sep 9, 20072
-
-
MackJan 6, 200910One of my favorite movies. Great acting (one of Morgan Freeman's best) and an amazing atmosphere. I get sucked in every time.
-
-
ClifC.Mar 9, 20098Some moments were useless and sometimes boring. But the acting is really good and the end of the movie is simple, yes, but great.
-
-
DeziWFeb 15, 20108Was a brilliant film until the killer gave himself up, the plot was obvious from then on. The ending was clever but tired, lacking any real action, The background to the film was great, morbidly and raining all the time. Morgan freeman was good but not great and brad pitt was awful in some parts of the film, talking stupid most of the time and overacting his part as a frustrated young cop.
-
-
YoonC.Sep 15, 20036Good performances, intelligent directing but another disgusting and sensationalistic serial killer movie with no other purpose than to tiltillate and shock.
-
-
BenW.Sep 6, 20038Could've been f..king great, but I think Fincher's ending was unimpressive.
-
-
PatC.Jan 10, 20045All of the gore only a Hannibal Lecter wanna-be can provide, without the introspection of how you can avoid your own personal bogeyman after the film ends. Instead, psychic disfigurement of the pursuing law enforcement agent is the overall goal. Deserves credit for pointing out that the seven deadly sins really can be grosser than the disposal of their advocates.
-
-
AdamR.Nov 28, 200410If a film this good came out every year, boredom wouldnt exist.
-
-
MichaelM.Oct 23, 20049
-
-
JamesMDec 7, 20059Not perfect, it's actually quite dull in parts, but the directing is superb and it's a very entertaining film.
-
-
JackBOct 4, 200510This film is nothing short of brilliant. It is dull in parts but this is made up by the sheer brilliance of the plot unfolding and the greatest twist to a plot I have ever seen. 10/10
-
-
SamH.Jun 25, 200610It's not that it is a film that has twists or turns or anything like that.. its a film with structure that flows seamlessly, with great cinematography, performances and writing, fincher creats an atmosphere that has substance its a movie that everytime I watch I forget how great it is.
-
-
jonathansJan 6, 20076Um, no, to all those out there who loved the ending, I hate to disappoint you but it was much too predictable. The premise is very interesting to be sure, but I cannot see why all these people are so caught up in the ending when it became obvious about thirty minutes before the actual ending.
-
-
RitaD.Nov 5, 200810Best film ever, in my view. This is at least in part because it had the courage to deliver a totally unsentimental and bleak ending.
-
-
CharlieS.Jan 30, 20080Lousy and vile.
-
-
TomL.May 15, 200810Fincher at his best, he crafts Se7en into a relentlessly damning thriller that leaves you on the edge of your seat to the very end. But the fact that he manages to do this without having to show much graphic violence is what separates this film from others in the genre. Even if you think this movie is too dark, it still manages to shake you to your core. And there's no denying that.
-
-
DrendaL.Sep 24, 200810How this movie is only a 65 is beyond me. One of the greatest films of all time. Seriously.
-
-
AlexLJan 17, 20090The movie is so self indulgent and preachy that it forgets to even name the place it takes place, let alone develop its cliche characters. The people who gave it a 10 were too busy enjoying the blood and Brad Pitts bad acting to notice the lack of story.
-
-
AdrianM.May 22, 20098
-
-
fabioNov 29, 200410Terrific story.
-
-
DavidMar 31, 20053Overrated, nihilistic and surprisingly predictable.
-
-
JohnB.Aug 31, 20058I thought the movie was very well down. Fincher did an excellent job making this movie and i think the performance by Morgan Freeman was once again top notch. I was disappointed with the ending however. It just kind of fell. Instead of any real closure or resolution following the ending it just kind of, well, ended. Other than that a fabulous movie that is well worth the watch.
-
-
StanA.Aug 17, 200610This movie is a pure masterpeice. Some seem to be disappointed with the ending but that is the thing that makes it run through your head over and over- without the ending it would destroy sevens perfection.
-
-
BlakeJ.Mar 11, 20079
-
-
KentC.Jan 14, 20083I don't mind the blood, gore, or language. The reason I gave this movie such a low score is because it was BORING. It was very hard to sit through and I got tired of watching it right away. Skip this and watch "Zodiac", the superior of Fincher's two serial killer movies.
-
-
RyanM.Dec 11, 200210"Se7en" will have you trembling, a bleak, gruesome, lightless thriller, just the way I like it.
-
-
JakeDec 14, 20058Everything that the Saw movies want to be: Creepy, sadistic and thrilling. Enjoyed it quite a bit, although I was disappointed by how the killer ia revealed in the final third (although Edward Norton pulled off a pretty damn creepy performance). The ending, although pretty shocking and original, seemed anticlimactic, making what could have been a great film merely a good one.
-
-
Nov 19, 20106
-
Nov 27, 20115Its not good but its not bad. Brad Pitt does a suprisingly bad job in this film and overacts quite a bit, Morgan Freeman is generic as well (neither good nor bad). Overall the film is a little interesting but its not that good.
-
Jan 12, 20119Yes the acting by Brad Pitt is pretty bad but beyond that this movie is great. Freeman, Paltrow, and Spacey deliver. It does have a great story. To me it is more of a suspense thriller than horror film. To me it speaks of how society is and what evil even innocent people are capable of. All people sin even to the extent of the seven deadly ones.
-
Jul 30, 20119
-
May 24, 20118
-
Feb 26, 20124
-
Apr 1, 201210
-
Aug 5, 201110
-
Jan 1, 20124
-
Mar 31, 201210First off I would give this a 9.75 out of 10. Near perfection. Well acted by both Morgan Freeman and brad pitt. Story is great. It's so suspenseful wondering what'll happen next. Score is outstanding. Adds to the intensity. Overall this is probably one of the greatest underrated thrillers ever. You need to see this movie.
-
Apr 26, 201210
prev
next
Page:
- 1
-
70A decidedly medieval enterprise, darker in text and tone than a Gothic cathedral by the light of the moon.
-
75This homicide thriller has a tantalizingly morbid atmosphere of unease.
-
30Not even bags of body parts, a bitten-off tongue or a man forced to cut off a pound of his own flesh keep it from being dull. [22 September 1995, p. C18]