Metascore
58 out of 100

Mixed or average reviews - based on 16 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 8 out of 16
  2. Negative: 3 out of 16
  1. Anderson, his superb ensemble cast and inspired cinematographer Uta Briesewitz, appeal at once to the intellect and the emotions as they build suspense and tension mercilessly.
  2. Pulls you in with smooth assurance, then holds you hostage to extremely creepy developments in the most awesome haunted house since "The Shining."
  3. Horror fans and those who just plain enjoy a well-told story should thank the cinematic gods. Session 9 is not only the scariest movie of the year, but also perhaps the most easy to believe since the first "Blair Witch."
  4. 80
    May not quite be more than the sum of its creepy parts, but as a reality-is-fear launch into workaday darkness, it clearly points toward the horror genre's best destiny.
  5. 80
    A spine-tingler directed with fierce finesse.
  6. A natural successor to "The Blair Witch Project" in terms of its small suggestions of horror past and future.
  7. 70
    A deft exercise in atmospheric horror and insanity. Which is why it's unfortunate that, ultimately, Anderson steps back from the brink.
  8. A marvel of vérité nightmare atmosphere.
  9. 50
    The film isn't remotely scary. That's a shame, because it has top-notch performances by Peter Mullan and David Caruso.
  10. The story doesn't quite pay off, characters are underwritten and the surprise ending is contrived and unconvincing.
  11. 50
    The climactic revelation is a real disappointment, humdrum rather than chilling.
  12. 50
    The film, too artfully conceived to deliver many overt shocks, often feels long and aimless.
  13. 40
    The script for Session 9 is so underwritten that even such lively character actors as David Caruso, Peter Mullan, and Brendan Sexton III are left stranded.
  14. Reviewed by: Jay Carr
    38
    You couldn't ask for a better setting for a horror movie. What you could ask for is a better script.
  15. Reviewed by: David Edelstein
    30
    The final illuminations (people have demons, a mind is a terrible thing to lose) are a poor return on nearly two hours of ear-buckling, eye-stabbing incoherence.
  16. Reviewed by: Robert Koehler
    30
    Little more than an overworked exercise in jostling red herrings, and not particularly fresh herrings at that.
User Score

Universal acclaim- based on 52 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 39 out of 39
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 39
  3. Negative: 0 out of 39
  1. A very average horror film. Some genuinely unsettling and creepy sequences, but for the most part a dry and uninteresting flick. The setting and atmosphere is very spooky and well done, but this is wasted with a bad script and plot-line, and wooden acting. Full Review »
  2. 7
    There came a point in the movie that made it very easy to guess the ending. Despite this it is hard to deny that Session 9 is a smartly crafted thriller/horror flick. A genuinely creepy movie. Full Review »
  3. Let me put it this way. If this review was based on the story itself, it would be an 8 or a 9. The movie is moody, menacing, and at some points borderline terrifying. But there's way more to a movie than the story. In pretty much every other area, Session 9 is flawed. The characters are shallow, the dialogue painful at some points. I found myself not really caring about what happened 2/3 of the way through. But the last 10 minutes was fairly redemptive. It was pretty shocking, not a twist that I at all expected. It made it worth watching, but up until the last 10-15 minutes, it's a pretty frustrating ride. Full Review »