- Studio: Miramax Films
- Release Date: Oct 15, 2004
- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
75Conventional as it may be, Shall We Dance? offers genuine delights. The fact that Paulina is uninterested in romance with John comes as sort of a relief, freeing the story to be about something other than the inexorable collision of their genitals.
-
75The new film compensates with Gere's wry performance as a man who lacks for nothing material but hungers for something spiritual. Even better is Stanley Tucci's delirious turn as Gere's balding, button-down colleague.
-
75Gere is a pleasure, smiling and spinning and high-fiving his two classmates -- played by Bobby Cannavale and Omar Miller -- and the movie is happy and extremely likable.
-
75This is Geres movie, and Sarandon and Lopez graciously let him dance away with it.
-
It's an intelligent, funny, mature comedy that wears its heart on its sleeve and makes you care about the inner lives of ridiculously privileged human beings.
-
75A warm-hearted and understated entertainment that's blissfully free of the heavy-handed crudity and other elements that have ravaged 21st-century Hollywood comedy.
-
70A sleek Hollywood crowd-pleaser, more movie than art film, but its makers have wisely stuck not only to the spirit but often even to the letter of the original.
-
70As glossy and overproduced as the thing is, it's a GOOD Big Stupid American movie.
-
67When it works, Shall We Dance? has a way of sweeping you off your feet.
-
63The movie tries hard to duplicate the original's mood and story, but, like Gere or Lopez, is too much of a visual knockout to rope us in.
-
63Goes too far in its slapstick efforts to please mainstream audiences, but there's no denying the genuine appeal of -- and I can't believe I'm actually writing this -- Richard Gere and ballroom dancing.
-
63I walked out of the original Shall We Dance? with a silly grin on my face. I left this one shaking my head, wondering where it had all gone wrong.
-
60Only Lopez, the film's ostensible star, seems to be struggling; she's a lovely dancer, but the only reason Lopez's expressionless performance isn't this sweet picture's downfall is that the script makes so few demands on her.
-
60An old- fashioned feel-good fantasy that piles on the euphoria.
-
60An unabashedly old-fashioned entertainment loaded with traditional dancing and music.
-
50Considering the talent on both sides of the camera and a story that worked beautifully the first time around, Shall We Dance? should have been a lot better than OK.
-
50The warm performances give the film momentum, but writer Audrey Wells and director Peter Chelsom (who chops dance sequences clumsily) often stumble.
-
50The movie never gives its heart freely and honestly to the satiny whirl of post-"Chicago" showbiz spectacle it so clearly wants to be.
-
50The movie feels choppy and rhythmless. And he's (Chelsom) rather hopeless at dance sequences.
-
50Shall We Dance?, which roams all over the emotional map without landing anywhere, is an unwieldy mess that gives every impression of having been made under a mandate to fill the Miramax crowd-pleaser slot.
-
50Runs out of breath and collapses into a heap of feel-good endings that turn a soaring feeling into a sinking one. But by then, the audience that adores it will forgive it its sins.
-
40Even those who have never been exposed to the considerable charms of the Masayuki Suo original will likely find Peter Chelsom's all-American version of Shall We Dance? to be a dishearteningly sullen, lead-footed misstep.
-
40Chelsom has transformed a low-key charmer into an overblown shtick-com whose idea of restraint only extends to forgoing wacky sound effects, a laugh track, and amplified rim-shots every time a character delivers a wisecrack.
-
While Suo's original was hardly a masterpiece, it featured a subtle performance from Koji Yakusho. Gere doesn't even compare, playing the part of a despondent lawyer with the empathy of a mannequin.
-
Occasionally charming but ultimately forgettable bit of fox-trot fluff.
-
40Manages to transplant the action to Chicago without completely ruining it, though the emotional impact is largely deflated by the change in cultures.
-
38This is a "What were they thinking?"-size disaster, with the wrong actors in the wrong roles in a project that had no reason to be remade in the USA.
-
38Do yourself a favor and rent the 1996 original from Japan instead.
-
38Now, forcibly deported to Chicago and peopled with American stars, the same story is huffed and puffed and squeezed into an entirely different cultural context. Guess what? Sayonara sushi, hello turkey.
-
30A remarkably ill-advised remake.
-
25What's left is a lot of strenuous playacting when what's called for is the finesse of the Japanese original. Skip this stub-toed substitute.
-
25Falls flat, with more "sound design" than delicious music, more slick film editing than graceful ballroom gliding.
-
25The low point of the new Shall We Dance comes when Miss Paulina finally confesses why she's so sad.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 18 out of 28
-
Mixed: 2 out of 28
-
Negative: 8 out of 28
-
horsth.7Easy entertainment.great music. Afeelgood movie.