- Studio: DreamWorks Distribution
- Release Date: Oct 1, 2004
User Score
5.3
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 78 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 42 out of 78
-
Mixed: 9 out of 78
-
Negative: 27 out of 78
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
BernardC.Oct 4, 20042Like wow! So frickin cheap!This movie was a rip off of finding nemo. I think this movie made their company lose tons of money. This was like a ghetto version of finding nemo,lmao. I gave it a 2 because I actually wasted my time and money to see it. My little baby cousin even said this movie sucked.
-
-
KeeferL.Oct 3, 20043If Keith Richards persona was the inspiration for Johnny Depp's character in Pirates of the Carribean, Jack Black's inspiration for Lenny in Shark Tales was Charles Nelson Reilly. This movie barely held the attention of three boys between seven and eight, and given the commotion in the theatre, no one seemed terribly entertained.
-
-
ElliottWDec 1, 20084A mediocre film. All of it seems very uninspired and boring. Dreamworks got it right with Shrek and Madasgcar, but they failed here.
-
-
PayamM.Oct 1, 20040
-
-
JaredOct 1, 20043
-
-
judyt.Feb 13, 20053Not funny at all. Animation only average.
-
-
MichaelA.Feb 14, 20050Tedious and simple. Will Smith will forever suck.
-
-
JonP.Mar 28, 20051Very disappointing! I turned it off half way through. Jokes were stale, and storyline was weak. They studio crapped this out quickly to ride on the coat tails of Finding Nemo.
-
-
PhilipOct 1, 20042
-
-
ZackO.Nov 3, 20040This was a horrible boring movie with a horrendous script and bad jokes.
-
-
RachelB.Oct 2, 20041
-
-
RyanSep 29, 20042Shameless rip-off of Finding Nemo and not nearly as well done or heartfelt. Save your money.
-
-
KevinE.Jan 20, 20052If I hadn't seen it on a plane, I never would have, and that would have been okay. Not an ounce of charm, wit or imagination. I think the animators forgot it was supposed to be an undersea world, or just didn't care. There could have been SO many more clever moments dealing with, if nothing else, being under water! Feed this chum only to your dullest children.
-
-
ToddJul 8, 20072It isn't Pixar. It is Dreamworks. Pixar couldn't produce such crap even if they tried.
-
-
JocelynS.Oct 11, 20040
-
-
IanP.Dec 4, 20043
-
-
TravisC.Oct 31, 20043Quite simply, the movie was BORING. As an adult, I found it utterly dull, un-funny, and unengaging. Even my 10-year-old cousin leaned over halfway through the film and asked me what time it was, and later admitted to being bored by the film. Even "Finding Nemo" was better, and I didn't like it, either.
-
-
[Anonymous]May 23, 20080
-
-
Jun 11, 20113
-
Oct 9, 20114Despite a ensemble 'voice' cast, "Shark Tale" is a normal Dream works animation with the obvious hero path formula intended to scrap money out of the audience.
-
Nov 18, 20112Whatever Shark Tale has done, Finding Nemo does an awful lot better. The story is lame and the adult humor will not make sense to most who see this. I didn't like the visuals, which make it even worse. It is hard to stomach.
-
Mar 26, 20123
-
Apr 27, 20123Simply, very lame with a poor plot and unfunny jokes with nothing interesting or worth your time and forgettable songs and character's . it is best to say, skip this movie. Final score: D-
-
60Full of invention, but under the colorful icing is a slightly stale cake.
-
88Represents solid family entertainment, and will find a special place in the hearts of those who adore the "Godfather" movies and the TV series "The Sopranos."
-
50The film has a hectic, sitcom air and a full-of-himself hero who is as likely to grate as to ingratiate.