- Studio: Picturehouse Entertainment
- Release Date: Sep 14, 2007
- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
75As sensuous as its title, Silk is an exquisitely felt love story that unfolds as delicately as a blooming flower. And as slowly.
-
58Sensual but profoundly silly, Silk is ultimately little more than softcore porn with arthouse trappings, a moony, dopily romantic "Red Shoe Diaries" variation for the NPR set.
-
50Everything is brought together at the end in a flash of revelation that is spectacularly underwhelming.
-
Beautiful but flimsy film.
-
50Cinematographer Alain Dostie's stunning, painterly cinematography is the best -- and perhaps only -- reason to endure this stunted epic.
-
50Though elegantly staged, Silk is badly written and indifferently cast.
-
50Failing to make a lick of rational sense, Silk grasps at poetic straws.
-
50Though the film aspires to the epic with pretensions of deeper philosophical meaning, it ultimately settles for being the "Escape (The Piña Colada Song)" of historical romances.
-
A visually arresting period piece.
-
42Wan, generically pretty adaptation of Alessandro Baricco's 1996 novel.
-
40Mr. Pitt is a reasonably photogenic specimen. But this actor, whose typical screen character is a broken, androgynous man-child, is disastrously miscast.
-
38By the end of Francois Gerard's plodding, uninvolving melodrama, his boredom will have nothing on yours.
-
38By any standards, Silk is a bad movie: pretentious, stillborn, devoid of emotion.
-
20Silk is a snooze. Vacuous, arid and terminally dull, this adaptation of Alessandro Baricco's freak bestseller hasn't a trace of real life or energy to it, and is hamstrung by a lethargic lead performance by Michael Pitt.
-
Silk isn't just bad. It's utterly mad. It stutters and hiccups from scene to scene, from country to country, but never once does it make narrative or emotional sense.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 1 out of 1
-
Mixed: 0 out of 1
-
Negative: 0 out of 1
-
JohnN.10