- Studio: Screen Gems
- Release Date: Feb 1, 2002
- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
38So patchy in its laughs, so calculated in its grossness and so lacking in genuine comic exuberance, it makes you look at "Road Trip" in an admiring new light.
-
38Once again, we have a movie where the jokes are aimed at the least common denominator - meaning that to genuinely enjoy the experience of sitting through Slackers, you will need help from a controlled substance.
-
38Before immediately handing the movie an F and sending it off to summer school, give the filmmakers, and especially co-star Jason Schwartzman, credit for their anarchic willingness to try anything to shock a laugh loose from an audience.
-
33The movie doesn't so much extend Schwartzman's antic outsider persona from ''Rushmore'' as uglify it, reducing him to the ultimate Uncool Anti-WASP.
-
33A disappointing venture. If only it had been more clever, perhaps darker.
-
30The most that can be said for Slackers -- aside from the unqualified pleasure of Schwartzman's unfaked, puppyish weirdness -- is that it doesn't abandon its putrid ideals for the sake of a neat finish.
-
30Awful and subversively spunky at the same time.
-
25Slackers depends on the pathetic Ethan and the flatulent Sam for most of its laughs, and both characters are more revolting than amusing.
-
25A discordant comedy that gives bad taste a bad name.
-
25There's scant character development, pedestrian dialogue, and an almost complete lack of humor.
-
25An odd little movie. And not in a good way.
-
25The roll call of perversions and adolescent sex gags are more creepy than kooky and the sudden shift to triumphant romantic sincerity at the climax rings as false as this film's sappy (sorry, happy) ending.
-
20The gags are familiar collegiate stuff, involving horny young men, horny old whores -- horny young tramps -- silly foreigners, uptight authority figures, homosexuals and sassy fat women.
-
20The title not only describes its main characters, but the lazy people behind the camera as well.
-
20Slackers is supposed to be a gross-out comedy, but the tastelessness of its jokes is nothing compared to its sheer cluelessness.
-
20Schwartzman steals Slackers without much effort, but it's not worth the theft.
-
20A standard issue undergrad gross-out comedy notable only for the showy role it provides Jason Schwartzman, well-remembered as "Rushmore's" geeky high school student Max Fischer.
-
Not only is Slackers painfully bad, but it's also about as morally unpleasant as a teen sex comedy can be.
-
12Slackers is, well, consummately cheesy. Ugh.
-
10A shit stain on the genre.
-
10So lazy and slipshod it confuses the mere flashing of kinky soft-core imagery with naughty fun.
-
10How bad is it? Let me count just some of the ways.
-
0A dirty movie. Not a sexy, erotic, steamy or even smutty movie, but a just plain dirty movie. It made me feel unclean, and I'm the guy who liked "There's Something About Mary" and both "American Pie" movies.
-
0A singularly distasteful campus romp.
-
0Barely proficient on a craft level, this jumble of putatively comic misunderstanding and overly familiar crude burlesque achieves its nadir with a cameo from Mamie Van Doren, a degrading, shameful turn that lays bare, all too literally, the filmmakers' contempt for women.
-
0Stinks like a cat box that hasn't been changed in a hundred years.
-
0Alas, Slackers sucks. It's so bad Schwartzman can't save it, though he tries mightily; a flash of nudity from Pearl Harbor babe and male-named model-turned-actress James King isn't even worth the price of a video rental down the line.
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 14 out of 22
-
Mixed: 3 out of 22
-
Negative: 5 out of 22
-
ChrisA.10
-
EvA.10