- Studio: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
- Release Date: May 19, 2005
User Score
7.1
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 1043 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 767 out of 1043
-
Mixed: 91 out of 1043
-
Negative: 185 out of 1043
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Apr 27, 20134
-
Mar 30, 20134I know that a lot of people love this, and it is the best of the prequels, but the dialogue, acting, and plot is terrible. This is the best prequel, but that's not saying much.
-
Feb 26, 20132This film exhibits poor writing, acting, storytelling, just name any feature and it will most likely be a disappointment. Anakin's fall to the dark side was a story with a huge amount of potential and it has been thoroughly wasted. In that way, it is the worst of the three films and is not considered so only because it is as close as we get to the original trilogy in terms of story.
-
Dec 30, 20124
-
Nov 25, 20124As a fan of the first trilogy, I'm still forced to call this episode the 'best' of the second trilogy. Which doesn't help it much. A feeble attempt to 'bring things full circle ("The circle is now complete."???). Even the special effects seem hokey compared to the original 3 films. The only good thing I can say about this is that it's the last film in this set.
-
Nov 21, 20112While it has seen some improvement, Episode 3 isnt all that better then the previous film. The acting still sucks, The story is a little better this time around but not by much, and it ended rather anti-climactic.
-
Oct 21, 20114While not as bad as Attack of the Clones, Revenge of the Sith is still dire because of Lucasâ
-
Feb 22, 20114
-
Feb 16, 20110
-
EvIlnIcESep 23, 20090
-
-
JonathanCJan 7, 20090If I could spit in this text box instead of writing anything, I would.
-
-
SenselockeFeb 20, 20083
-
-
J.WFeb 6, 20070I think I'd rather watch cut scenes from a video game. This was atrocious, the plot and especially acting. How bad is Anakin's final 'nooooo!' when he transforms into vader? I just pretend the whole I, II and III triology never happened.
-
-
BobB.Sep 27, 20062
-
-
KeithM.Jul 9, 20062
-
-
JamesW.Apr 2, 20060
-
-
CharlieW.Feb 21, 20060Just a long string of saber fight after saber fight. Generally, I like it when movies actually have a STORY!!!! Shame on you Lucas...
-
-
MarkWDec 7, 20052Not only the worse Star Wars Episode but one the worse films I've seen. Extremely bland and elementary dialog. It just seemed to be short acts of basic information separated by computer graphics of locations. I'm sure the die hard S.W. Fans are happy but as a movie this just didn't hold up.
-
-
georgea.Nov 21, 20051
-
-
DaxNov 17, 20052It will take some mental exercises to erase this from my memory, but I think I might be able to like IV, V and VI again someday...as long as I can disassociate them from the prequels. Good...god.
-
-
evilDNov 14, 20052
-
-
MyNameNov 13, 20050A waste of 3 very long hours.
-
-
joebNov 9, 20052I thought both of the lead actors were wimps. The acting over all is poor. The actors do not make you care about them or what they are doing. I was very dissappointed with this movie.
-
-
SkullchristNov 8, 20050The rating I gave this movie represents the amount of effort Lucas actually put into the prequels.
-
-
HenryWNov 8, 20051How did George Lucas think he could get away with this, and - more importantly - how did he get away with this?
-
-
LetheW.Nov 6, 20050If anyone thinks they should listen to a word Lucas says, I dare any fan to watch the episodes in order I through VI (as Lucas says he intended all along). The plot holes will be large enough to drive an entire deathstar through.
-
-
w00keeNov 4, 20052
-
-
DavidTNov 2, 20054
-
-
TAug 31, 20050I've seen piles of rotting veggies that were more entertaining.
-
-
SkullAug 23, 20050I've given up even caring anymore. I've wasted too much of my time trying explain to the legions of brainwashed fans, new and old, how damaging these last three movies have been to the Star Wars mythos. I will not shed a tear when George is dead and gone.
-
-
MaryM.Aug 12, 20053I heard people say of this movie, "It doesn't suck as much as the last two," and more fool me for not knowing the sound of damning with faint praise when I heard it. One of those movies like Blair Witch Project that had me saying by the end, "I hope they all die." Watchable, just.
-
-
TheConundrumAug 2, 20053
-
-
TonyO.Jul 28, 20054
-
-
G.M.D.K.Jul 20, 20054Gorgeus scenery of every spectacle; but that is, that every spectacle is an exhilirating letdown after another. Dissapointing with this film. The whole film feels like a climax and It isnt accesible to people who arent much into "Star Wars". I perfer the grandios "Attack of the Clones."
-
-
amanthathatesthismovieJul 14, 20050Quite possibly one of the worst movies i have ever seen. weak acting, weaker plot, and weakest movie.
-
-
AliCJul 14, 20052
-
-
johnmJul 14, 20050Stunningly bad. its no different to eps 1 and 2, and in many places is actually worse. hopefully lucas will stop making movies now because what talent he did have 20 years ago has evaporated.
-
-
Oneofex-fansJul 13, 20050Sorry all fans but this last episode is the worst. Just a far-fetched story to complete the saga. The biggest disaster is acting. If Lukas was planning to make drama he screwed big time or even more if he planned to create an action movie. To far far from original episodes. it is a pity.
-
-
RicardoR.Jul 13, 20050
-
-
GeoffG.Jul 7, 20050A total and utter mess! what i don't understand is that anyone can say they hated episodes i & ii but LOVE episode iii...what gives? it's the same old garbage! bad acting, HORRIBLE script and video game special fx...i'm sorry but i don't get it.
-
-
davidr.Jun 25, 20052Dreadful dialogue, terrible acting, and totally undermotivated story, why bother?
-
-
stua.Jun 24, 20051Boring. Trival. No point.
-
-
DaveO.Jun 21, 20053How on earth did Padme find the time for those complex hairstyles? Oh - that's right - she never went to work.
-
-
CaptainSpauldingJun 19, 20054
-
-
rbJun 18, 20051What a disappointment! Way too much talking! And such insipid dialogue. The acting was phoned in. To think I waited for this!!???
-
-
GordM.Jun 14, 20053
-
-
MattGJun 13, 20052With or without Star Wars nostalgia, Revenge of the Sith is a bad movie. It is only marginally better than the previous two films, mainly because it would be near impossible for it to be worse. It is interesting to note that most positive reviews posted here show no evidence of basic writing skills such as proper punctuation and spelling. Enough said.
-
-
TimW.Jun 13, 20050
-
-
RexJun 10, 20051Unless you're a Star Wars weirdo you should see right through all of the special effects to find a truly horrible movie. The dialog should push this movie into the comedy category and out of Sci-Fi Action. I actually laughed out loud during some of the
-
-
CodyKJun 8, 20050I was very disappointed with this movie
-
-
BiggusDealusJun 7, 20051Wookies wielding laser shooting crossbows don't make a movie. Neither did anything else, including Lucas.
-
-
KurtS.Jun 6, 20052While I'm a fan of the original 3, I could not like this movie, even if I tried. Rather than list my reasons, I could cite the theater's audible groans and laugher--especially during the 'Darth Vaderstein' scene. It's a sad thing to witness the destruction of what was an engaging myth.
-
-
PrintNinjaJun 6, 20052
-
-
MarshallR.Jun 5, 20051
-
-
scatsdJun 3, 20052
-
-
MattM.Jun 3, 20054An improvement? yes, but lucas is a fool. some very cool "gimicy" scenes but some terrible decisions. the story is excellent and a much better film could have been made. it was relieving it wasn't aweful but still it was dissapointing. i feel sorry for Star Wars fans, it just should have been left alone, but i suppose once again there was money to be made.
-
-
MichaelLJun 2, 20051What Craig A said, but I'll give it a 1 out of pity. What a shocker, all I can say is... NOOOOOOOOOOO!!!
-
-
CraigA.Jun 2, 20050
-
-
JaneG.May 31, 20052Two hours of a boring video game folled by a twenty minute movie about the origin of Darth Vader. Lucas milks the fan base one last time. I'll give it a 2 out of respect for the original trilogy, but this movies deserves less. Shame on you George Lucas.
-
-
SFJonesMay 31, 20051
-
-
GregLMay 31, 20052
-
-
ChristianB.May 29, 20052
-
-
TomB.May 28, 20052Awful and boring. All the fight sequences were just one long dull slog after another; and Anakin's transformation into Darth Vader is entirely unbelievable, poorly acted and incredibly plotted. I thought that of the first 3, ep. 2 was best. (I mean as labeled by Lucas, not in order of release.)
-
-
LukeG.May 27, 20051
-
-
BobO'FettMay 26, 20052That Sith is number 3 behind Star Wars and Empire is faint praise. I would look forward to seeing Jedi, Menace or Clones with the same anticipation as a case of the dry heaves, that is unless Lucas agrees to produce an Ewoks vs. Jar Jar Celebrity Death Match episode. One cannot be unimpressed with this movie, which, of course, wraps up the series - tight - like embalmed.
-
-
ShaunD.May 26, 20051
-
-
LordGreystokeMay 25, 20053
-
-
JohnnyFiveMay 25, 20052As a film, Sith makes a great video game. I wasn't sure if I had just slipped accidentally into someone's home theater. Between the giant space combat scenes and the giant lightsaber scenes there is scarcely room for a plot. Good thing, as I have seen better scripting in a video game. The only thing missing was the cheat code that gets me straight to the end.
-
-
C.MasonMay 25, 20053Tedious. Action was good, but Lucas cannot write.
-
-
J.CaloMay 24, 20054It's a bunch of garbage. [Ed: Yet still a 4?] I think Lucas paid the critics off to ensure a better review than it should have received.
-
-
ChrisT.May 24, 20051From a story-telling/film-making point of view, it's embarrassingly devoid of style.
-
-
EdH.May 24, 20052Action scenes where rushed, no epic battles tell the end. The rest are just long enough to say they where in the movie. The love story was just horrid. As a long time star wars nut the film was a major disapointment.
-
-
JoeT.May 24, 20053You might like this movie if you're either under 14 or if you're a grown man that brings plastic toys to the theater.
-
-
JoshoM.May 24, 20052
-
-
TylerN.May 23, 20053
-
-
K-DogMay 23, 20054The dialogue is boring and the acting is so bad it's laughable. The light saber scenes and gallactic war scenes would have been cool maybe five years ago, but now they're just expected and boring. We can't help but take them for granted. However there is one really good scene in the whole mess: the rise of Darth Vader is possibly the funniest thing I have ever seen in my life.
-
-
GuyW.May 23, 20051Honestly, how can reviewers praise how satisfying it is that Episode III resolves the plotlines leading to Episode IV? All I can say is
-
-
ScottS.May 23, 20051
-
-
EricH.May 23, 20054
-
-
JudyT.May 22, 20051
-
-
MikeH.May 22, 20054Horrible acting. Weak plot. A turning to the darkside that seemed more like a choice of what clothes to wear to school.
-
-
MarkB.May 22, 20054Typically over the top, more effects than brains, stupid dialogue and really (and I mean REALLY) bad acting. Christensen is the reason, with his soulless performance, that this one gets a 4 from me. He was absolutely pathetic!!
-
-
BillZ.May 22, 20054The best of the prequels, but that's not saying much...there is a real epic feel to this one, but unfortunately this is fatally undermined by the dreadful, stilted dialogue and weak plot. Good acting from McDiarmid & McGregor, so-so from Christensen, and terrible acting from Portman (who does little but stay at home and cry).
-
-
PeterB.May 22, 20053Just as poorly conceived, acted and executed as the first two prequels. No, the third time is not the charm. Thank god this is the last one. We hope.
-
-
ThomasMay 22, 20051
-
-
F.Fletch(UK)May 22, 20053
-
-
ChrisP.May 21, 20054
-
-
JoshuaM.May 21, 20054As everyone now knows, George Lucas is a terrible screenwriter and director, which may be why people are so symmpathetic to this last movie. More action and less awful dialog is a good thing, so is more fighting and less monotone line reading. But let's face it, if Star Wars didn't have street cred this movie would be straight to video.
-
-
LouisM.May 21, 20052I truly do not understand the mind of a Star Wars fan. They boast about how their hero, George Lucas, loved and recreated practically all cinema of the past, yet they refuse to believe that Lucas
-
-
TimH.May 21, 20050How can people be praising this movie? Are they oblivious to the simple fact that it is HORRIBLE. As a movie, it sucks. All the cool things that could have been done in this turn into missed opportunities at the most. But, as I said before, this movie was horrible. The writing was better than a retarded monkey and the directing was even worse. Terrible.
-
-
M.C.May 21, 20051
-
-
SandyM/May 21, 20052A truly boring piece of crap. Two amateurish and wooden male leads, talk, talk, talk, lousy editing, an inability to build tension. Best thing: when a monster space ship crash lands in the beginning of the film. That's about 30 seconds, so they owe $10.25!
-
-
JF.May 21, 20053Very disappointing...
-
-
BobbyK.May 21, 20051All in all, its a film that just doesnt have the magic of the originals. The ingredients are there, but the Lucas of 2005 just doesnt have the twinkle in his eye and spark in his mind that he did in 1977. This is Star Wars by numbers , without any of the charm of the originals.
-
-
RobertMay 21, 20053One of the funniest films of the year. Too bad it wasn't supposed to be a comedy.
-
-
DanB.May 20, 20053What a shame. It didn't even look that good. I mean, each little detail looked fantastic but, all together... so much razzle dazzle for so little effect... except the end lava sequence, which was pretty kickass.
-
-
BenB.May 20, 20053[***SPOILERS***] I
-
-
ZachMay 20, 20050Wow, that was a pile of sith.
-
-
BenMay 20, 20054Yes! Finally, the brutal end has arrived, and what a sell-out it was About as compelling and moving as a Streisand film; shame on you George. Let us go back to cinema inhabited by intelligent scripts, accomplished acting, reasonable motives, un-annoying characters, and imaginitive story-telling.
-
-
LauraH.May 20, 20054
-
-
88Only now can we truly step back and admire the full tapestry that it has taken George Lucas and his ILM wizards nearly three decades to weave.
-
90The final episode of George Lucas' cinematic epic "Star Wars" ends the six-movie series on such a high note that one feels like yelling out, "Rewind!" Yes, rewind through more than 13 hours of bravery, treachery, new worlds, odd creatures and human frailty.
-
90Emerges as the best in the overall series since "The Empire Strikes Back."