- Studio: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
- Release Date: May 25, 1977
User Score
8.8
out of 10
Universal acclaim- based on 427 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 399 out of 427
-
Mixed: 5 out of 427
-
Negative: 23 out of 427
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
Mar 24, 20132The year the film was made (an excuse for the lacking special effects) does not explain the fact that this was a boring and mediocre film.
-
Sep 28, 20111This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
G.M.D.K.May 2, 20053The worst of all the star wars movies. The problem with this star wars film is that it has a long boring decendency that if you start watching it,your eyes will hurt. There isnt the action that makes your heart leap (for example:LOTR trilogy,the incredibles,harry potter 3). If i become a star wars fan any day, it wouldnt be by this boring sci-fi.
-
-
MichaelH.Aug 12, 20080Only a cult nerd would enjoy this poorly composed film, George Lucas, please don't make any more movies!
-
-
StabsM.Sep 4, 20084
-
-
DJSpazSep 21, 20042
-
-
ChristianF.Sep 23, 20040There is nothing special about the Special Editions. Lucas should have listened to his fans and given us the option of watching the movies as they were orginally made.
-
-
EniG.Sep 22, 20074It was so interesting, I like the jedi light sabre.
-
-
[Anonymous]Feb 28, 20040
-
-
JaredC.Aug 21, 20070The boringest, terribly edited Sci-Fi film to date.
-
-
80Star Wars had all the right stuff, and unlike its confounding progenitor, "2001: A Space Odyssey," it was fairy-tale simple: "A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away," good met evil. [Special Edition]
-
100An exhilarating update of "Flash Gordon," very much in the same half-jokey, half-earnest mood, but backed by special effects that, for once, really work and are intelligently integrated with the story.
-
100If I were asked to say with certainty which movies will still be widely known a century or two from now, I would list "2001,'' "The Wizard of Oz,'' Keaton and Chaplin, Astaire and Rogers, and probably "Casablanca'' ... and "Star Wars,'' for sure.