- Studio: Columbia Pictures
- Release Date: Jul 29, 2005
User Score
4.6
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 68 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 30 out of 68
-
Mixed: 5 out of 68
-
Negative: 33 out of 68
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
May 11, 20134
-
Feb 28, 20122
-
MalcomM.Oct 27, 20052
-
-
WizzAug 29, 20053[***SPOILERS***] This film was a 117 minute long cliche. (Computer goes haywire because it got struck by lightning, Black guy dies first, white guy and women live happily ever after, and so on, and so on). It was a waste of my time. The only thing that was good about this movie were the special effects.
-
-
rollAug 18, 20051I'm sorry to say, but this is a totally bad movie. The awful story line actually kills what could have been a good action movie (think of a bad Miami-vice show, and make it even more stupid) . I tried looking at this movie with my brain turned off, didn't work... Good sound and special effect though.
-
-
PrattdaddyAug 11, 20051
-
-
MarcDAug 8, 20050Absolute crap.
-
-
RichardG.Aug 6, 20051Stephen Hunter is the best Crtic EVER!
-
-
SusanM.Aug 2, 20052I give it a 2 because the last 30 minutes was pretty good. The rest was utter crap, so dumbed down it was insulting.
-
-
JoeF.Aug 1, 20050The clue is in the trailer where it is announced in all seriousness that the rogue plane in question was struck by lightening which REWIRED! the plane. Not 'reprogrammed' or somesuch semi-comprehensible tosh but rewired! Lightening - rewiring a plane! All-in-all not on a par with Bergmans finest then.
-
-
WalterBAug 1, 20050Micheal Sragow is indead the worst critic of our time. His reviews are reliable however. Go see what he hates, skip what he likes. This movie failed on every level. Bring back Chris Katenblach!!!!
-
-
RodCAug 1, 20050I was going to jokingly give this movie a 10, you know just for laughs and attention. I find that in good conscience, I just can't. Horrible on so many levels. Ijust kept watching and waiting thinking, "It can't be this bad, something will happen." But it doesn't. Better than Battlefield Earth though, but then again, what isn't?
-
-
BillyHJul 31, 20050Worse than House On Haunted Hill. Worse than Alone In The Dark. Worse than Battlefeild Earth. I kid you not, I exaggerate not. This was the biggest waste of money and talent (Jamie Foxx) I've ever seen. There are no words.
-
-
DroogJul 30, 20051
-
-
SethSJul 29, 20050An interstin thing to note is that this was filmed in February of 2004-before Jamie Foxx did "Collateral" or "Ray". This is probably why they 'wasted' (in more ways than one) him in this movie. That was a HUGE mistake. That explosion in the preview that you could see from space, that was this bomb of a movie being dropped.
-
-
VictorB.Jul 29, 20050It was great to have Jamie Foxx in the film, he's the only reason I didn't walk out right away. I don't know why I stayed AFTER the first 30 minutes...
-
-
RichE.Jul 29, 20052The SpFx are competent, and the plane design is interesting--and it's nice to see Sam Shepard and Joe Morton getting work. Younger folk thinking of seeing this flick, though, should see instead the films being ripped off for it, especially the central portion of 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY and DR. STRANGELOVE; Stanley Kubrick got it right.
-
-
JuniorS.Jul 29, 20050Michael Scraglow(baltimore sun) gave it the second highest rating. AVOID IT AT ALL COSTS. This movie is liable to make you impotent or gve you cancer. You can always count on Scraglow's bad taste!
-
-
ColeslawJul 29, 20051I only went because my grandfather wanted something to rattle his bones before he died. By the end of the movie he begged me to kill him.
-
-
GregM.Jul 29, 20051I am the aforementioned video game addict, and in no way did this hold my interest. Dumb, dumb, then dumber, then when you thought it could not get dumber yet, it did just that.
-
-
PrudenceK.Jul 28, 20050This film was terrible. One of the worst of the year. But, was very impressed with Jessica Biel's virtuoso performance. Just kidding. It was a terrible, awful film... beginning to finish.
-
-
JohaanW.Jul 28, 20050Worthless! Just utter lame attempts at trying to bag off Jamie's previous successes. Horrible, cliched lines, and predictable outcome, with lame predictable characters. Not worth even 1 star. A True FLOP.
-
-
MiltonH.Jul 27, 20052Totally stupid, preposterous story which might possibly hold the interest of a video game addict.
-
-
Its action sequences, more geeky than thrilling, fail to rescue the laughable plot.
-
42Stealth, a dregs-of-summer knockoff, is too ponderous and inept to serve a comparable function now, yet the film's lack of thrust may be related to an absence of conviction about its own war-is-a-videogame clichés.
-
50A sort of retarded "Top Gun," Rob Cohen's Stealth revisits the world of cocky fighter pilots and war games turned real, but it has some serious moral quandaries on the brain, and too much thinking gets it into trouble.