X
- 2014
- PG-13
- Lionsgate Films
- 1 h 52 m
- 2014
- PG-13
- Lionsgate Films
- 1 h 52 m
Summary In the latest chapter of the Step Up series, all-stars from previous installments come together in Las Vegas to battle for a victory that could define their dreams and their careers.
Directed By: Trish Sie
Written By: Duane Adler, John Swetnam
- 2014
- PG-13
- Lionsgate Films
- 1 h 52 m
- 2014
- PG-13
- Lionsgate Films
- 1 h 52 m
Step Up: All In
45
5.8
Where to Watch
Summary In the latest chapter of the Step Up series, all-stars from previous installments come together in Las Vegas to battle for a victory that could define their dreams and their careers.
Directed By: Trish Sie
Written By: Duane Adler, John Swetnam
Where to Watch
Top Cast
Metascore
Mixed or Average
Based on 17 Critic Reviews
45
18% Positive
3 Reviews
3 Reviews
59% Mixed
10 Reviews
10 Reviews
24% Negative
4 Reviews
4 Reviews
Metascore
Mixed or Average
Based on 17 Critic Reviews
45
18% Positive
3 Reviews
3 Reviews
59% Mixed
10 Reviews
10 Reviews
24% Negative
4 Reviews
4 Reviews
It’s the rare movie that knows its limitations, but also understands how to use form to best convey its strengths, pulling together countless complicated dance scenes in which the relationships between teams and characters come through more clearly than they could through dialogue.
The fifth entry in the popular dance-off franchise is, like the others, a fantasia that upends the usual rules of filmmaking. Here, the more threadbare the scenario, and the more unmotivated an action, the better. Character and story just get in the way of all the awesome dancing.
User Score
Mixed or Average
Based on 50 User Ratings
5.8
42% Positive
21 Ratings
21 Ratings
32% Mixed
16 Ratings
16 Ratings
26% Negative
13 Ratings
13 Ratings
User Score
Mixed or Average
Based on 50 User Ratings
5.8
42% Positive
21 Ratings
21 Ratings
32% Mixed
16 Ratings
16 Ratings
26% Negative
13 Ratings
13 Ratings
The exuberant dance sequences have long been the series’ saving grace, but even those are starting to feel redundant and interchangeable.
With even less plot than in previous installments to get in the way of its inventive 3D dance scenes, this fifth pic delivers on spectacle... but lacks in chemistry.
The finale's energy level and actor buy-in makes it vastly more enjoyable than the rest of the film.
The best that can be said for “Step V” is that it has some sparkling moments of choreography, clever gimmicks as themes for the dance-offs and lovely costumes.
It is unlikely that a lot of viewers come to see a Step Up film for convincing dialogue or psychological insight into a group of young things trying to make it big in a ruthless industry. But there’s barely any humor that doesn’t feel third-rate and most of the plot threads are so thin that All In occasionally feels like a satire of a dance film.
I was one of the first people to see the movie. In my coutry it released really early, I think it was 11th or 18th of July.
People go to see Step Up movies not because of acting skills or special effects or story, but because of dancing skills and music. I've seen every single Step Up movie and all I can say, is that the 3rd installment of the franchise was the best one.
Step Up 1 had great story and it kicked the sequels going
Step Up 2 was nice, but the final dance was a diseaster in my opinion.
Step Up 3- its story was nice, characters were great, music was amazing ( I can still hear some tracks in my head! ) DANCE WAS AMAZING. And the final dance was great. The best movie
Step up 4 worse than the previous one but still enjoyable. Its story wasnt great, it was pretty generic, but the dancing was cool, as well as music. It felt original in some way.
Step up 5 - Personally, I think it had a lot of potential that was wasted. A bunch of marvellous dancers and nothing spectacular that came out of it. Mainly because I think that we've seen al of this already in the previous movies. The only character that I'm gonna remember is Iza Miko's portrayal of Alexxa Brava, just because when i saw her on screen, I was in an actual shock. If I hadn't seen The Hunger Games prior to that, I am not sure if my body would be able to handle it.
Dancing was ok, i liked it, but as I said previously, we've seen it before. What i hated tho, was the music. God it was awful. It was a typical techno-dubstep mush-up. Nothing original, nothing that went outside of the box. Music in this types of movies is a very important aspect and here it didnt work out. Thus I think it was below average, below the level, that the prevous movies established.
Report
One of these days Step Up will realize that it's better for the characters to just whimsically dance like in old musical movie without forcing an already stagnant plot. The movie boasts a dynamic choreography and stellar music to go with it, some are timed just right and they are admittedly entertaining. It commendably tries to bring a dancer's perspective on their life style and tribulation, but the plot often contradicts the effort by putting overly flamboyant characters or tired plot. In the end it's just another drawn out excuse for a dance battle, albeit a rather spectacular one.
Story revolves around characters from previous installments, collaborating to make a crew to win the high stake dance competition. No Channing Tatum though. If this sounds familiar, it is. There are monetary issues, personal issues and dances in between. For what it's worth, the two leads try to bring more emotion to the mix, although only a few good moments come out of it. Adam Sevani (Moose) is a star, the uncrowned lead of the series. It's quiet amazing that his side story resonates more than the actual main plot.
Problem arises when the movie attempts to exaggerate flamboyant lifestyle, especially those of celebrity's and their reality television. It's far from witty; in fact the humor tends to fall and becomes tiresome to watch. The main antagonists are mediocre unsavory characters; the male is copied directly from the typical random thug that messes with Chuck Norris or Steven Seagal at a bar, while the female is a botched version of Stanley Tucci's character from Hunger Games.
When the characters don't banter they perform well. Using odd props and good dance moves, they manage to produce a spectacle. Most of the cast are primarily dancers, so they convince the audience better using motion than poorly written script. Wardrobe looks good, each dance is represented with unique costume, the steampunk one is particularly exceptional. With simple yet effective effect, these dance sequences are the heights of the movie.
Like any other installments, the plot is almost a hindrance as audience waits for another dance scene to erupt. It does try to make audience relate, although it misses the mark more often than not, which is a shame since it invests plenty of time for it. The glossy choreograph and heart-thumping soundtracks present an enjoyable light flick, and to be fair it's what viewer would expect, but sadly nothing more.
Report
This movie is just bad, really bad. The script is just a constant fail, I felt shamed.
It could be nice if at least it was properly directed and the dacing coreographies were nice, but nope, they were not.
If you like dancing movies, don't watch this.
Bad and Boring movie.
Report
Step Up: All In is a boring dance movie. Really. If you've seen the trailer, don't bother to watch this spoiled opportunity. STAI follows Sean played by Ryan Guzman who teams up with the previous actors from the previous instalments battle to see who is the best dancer of all. Sounds good, right? Well, director Trish Sie has done a poor, horrible and bad job on this film. The story is loose, the characters don't tie together, and the dance is also CGI made. It's just Battle Of The Year 2! Step Up 2 and Revelution were both good movies, but All In is an example of the series going downhill.
Report
