- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
25A collection of product plugs masquerading as a movie en route to home video.
-
38Unfortunately, while director Steve Boyum is a successful stunt man and off-road biker, his skills do not extend to the relatively passive arena of filmmaking. Somehow, he even makes much of the action static.
-
0Fails to kick start anything other than the urge to giggle.
-
20Since the focus is on the track, the filmmakers aren't out to reinvent the wheel, but for such a simple piece of formula storytelling, they do a remarkably poor job of dotting I's and crossing T's.
-
25The movie's biggest drawback is a failure to deliver what's promised.
-
25The most amazing fact about Supercross is that it took three people to write it. Two chimpanzees with a typewriter could have done just as good a job.
-
0That legendary adolescent tolerance for garbage may be severely tested by Supercross.
-
0Shamelessly cross-promotional "extreme" sports flick.
-
38For anyone who digs hardcore motorcycle racing, Supercross delivers enough engine-revving, dirt-spewing motorcross action to satisfy even the most intense adrenaline craving.
-
The movie itself has no edge. It barely has a movie.
-
While there's no blood to be seen in Supercross, the film is rated PG- 13, due to some crash scenes, a little strong language and some mild sexuality. That's a shame. This movie was tailor-made for 12-year-olds.
-
A poor man's "Lords of Dogtown," substituting hard-core motorcycle racing for extreme skateboarding and featuring a young cast of television-bred actors.
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 4 out of 6
-
Mixed: 1 out of 6
-
Negative: 1 out of 6
-
AbbyL1
-
JohuaT.7
-
NealM.8