- Studio: United Artists
- Release Date: Jan 14, 2000
- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
63A perfectly enjoyable sci-fi thriller.
-
50Though predictable, isn't half bad.
-
38This was a mission that should have been aborted long ago.
-
It just goes to prove that in space, no one can hear you scream when the studio massacres your movie.
-
38Really lost in space.
-
Director Walter Hill won't take credit for Supernova... Can you blame him?
-
25Good actors seem plastic and plastic actors seem worse in a knockoff of every rocket-ship movie you've ever seen.
-
20This big budget mish-mash is almost unbelievably derivative and shockingly cheap looking.
-
20Fails chiefly because it's senseless. How it even managed to bypass the straight-to-video route boggles the mind and is a speculative fiction far more engaging than any to be found onscreen.
-
20Apparently fallen victim to the transparent damage-control tactics of studios in possession of perceived stinkers.
-
20Just doesn't live up to its title.
-
20Looks and moves like a film whose vital organs were yanked before shooting commenced.
-
20Light on originality and low on suspense though high on design and special effects.
-
20The flick's ultimate flaw? For a movie about space travel, it's an awfully uninspired trek.
-
20Appears headed for a deep-space rendezvous with audience indifference.
-
20This mildly moody SF thriller belabors standard dramatic conceits involving jealousy and sexual betrayal.
-
17This poor movie is like an abandoned car without plates: Nobody wants to admit it's theirs.
-
10Given the tainted history of Supernova, it's difficult to figure out where to place blame for either the undernourished screenplay or the moribund action.
-
10Supernova isn't so super.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 2 out of 7
-
Mixed: 2 out of 7
-
Negative: 3 out of 7
-
10
-
LewisB.0
-
KeithM.4