- Studio: DreamWorks SKG
- Release Date: Dec 21, 2007
User Score
7.5
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 375 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 293 out of 375
-
Mixed: 34 out of 375
-
Negative: 48 out of 375
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
HenryJJan 2, 20080Boo. Truly terrible. The problem mainly lies in the music, which is trite both melodically and lyrically.
-
-
PhilDFeb 23, 20083
-
-
IanK.Jan 2, 20080Musicals suck this is sooooo over rated crap.
-
-
DJDannyApr 6, 20082This is bad. Critics gave this an 83? WTF. Metacritic needs to readjust the critic calculation. [Ed: Sure thing, DJ....]
-
-
NavdeepS.Aug 8, 20091To say the least this movie would be the last on the list i would like to watch(even if its a Johny Depp movie).The reason i didn't like this movie was was not made for normal people.....i mean how can a person serve burgers having human organs.......and to add to the woes ending of the movie was ridiculous.
-
-
ArthurXJan 21, 20083
-
-
FM.Jan 3, 20082
-
-
TheDudeJan 4, 20084
-
-
JamesV.Jan 4, 20082
-
-
RickyQJan 7, 20083Overall, this is the most over hyped film I have ever seen. If the music was memorable I would understand all the great reviews, but really I don
-
-
WhitneyTJan 9, 20082What happened to the Burton charm of Edward Scissorhands? This movie was over-marketed, over-produced, over-musical. Nothing memorable, except the stupidity that the characters in this dark tale break into ridiculous, unappealing songs every five minutes. It made me groan every time I heard the score starting up. Maybe it would've worked better if it weren't a musical.
-
-
MichaelE.Feb 12, 20084No fun at all. To the extent that there is a plot it is transparent and redundant. To the extent that there is a subtext (regarding class warfare) it is brushed aside and stereotyped at every opportunity. To the extent that there are songs they are unmemorable and occasionally tuneless. To the extent that there is a visual design it is unimpressive. One of the least interesting films around.
-
-
AlessandroC.Feb 25, 20080Truly terrible. Boring, boring and... boring!!
-
-
mmApr 20, 20084lifeless and in the end boring. The lackluster singing of the leads and lack of chemistry doomed this venture. I find Simon B and DJs comments below funny - no bad movies, is that a real statement? And complaining to the editors of metacritic about the 83 score - blame the critics - I see a lot of 90 and 100s up there.
-
-
LarryR.Jul 4, 20084The singing is annoying; the songs are mediocre. If the actors would have just not sung, the movie might have been tolerable.
-
-
TonyJan 1, 20084Dark, dull, boring and boring. Did I mention it was boring?
-
-
JesseW.Feb 3, 20084Amazing movie in all respects except one; the singing was extremely bad... like squirm in your seat and cover your ears bad. Headache bad. It was like sitting through 2 hours of alley cats yowling. I would have scored it higher if it was on mute!
-
-
GlenG.Dec 22, 20074Ms. Carter's performance ruined what was otherwise a fine film. She was just terrible. Of course, I am jaded by the ghost of Ms. Lansbury's performance in the original version, but surely someone better suited to this role could have been found.
-
-
DBDec 28, 20073
-
-
DavidD.Dec 29, 20074Most over-rated movie this year.
-
-
[Anonymous]Dec 30, 20074Way better movies, not worth the time, too much blood for my taste.
-
-
MichaelMJan 18, 20082
-
-
KennethM.Jan 2, 20081About 20 minutes worth of dark chuckles mixed in with an hour and a half of eye glazing boredom. Honestly, have you had the wool pulled over your eyes by Burton? This film was awful!
-
-
L.F.Jan 2, 20082Two stars for the great costumes and for getting to see Helena Bonham Carter (we see far too much of Johnny Depp already, thanks). The film is vile, bloody, and utterly pointless. The gore serves no point other than gross-out. The songs will stick in your head, but only in way that annoying jingles do as they are repetitive and grating. It will make you sigh for the happier days of "Beetlejuice".
-
-
TariqP.Jan 24, 20082I completely agree with so many of you. Style over substance. I found this painfully hard to watch as it was so boring
-
-
TomP.Jan 25, 20084
-
-
ShabahoJ.Jan 6, 20083I was thouroughly browned throughout, therefore it is safe to say that i was in the best mindset to view the film, and so i enjoyed it immensely. But it was pretty lackluster besides being stoned on.
-
-
FrederickM.Apr 10, 20083just shoot me, thats what i said heading out of the theatre, I absolutely hated this musical/slasher flick, the two should never meet again, except for Jason Voorhies meets the Brady bunch, then...maybe.
-
-
CBoyApr 11, 20083I'll admit it is full of blood and Johnny was brilliant in it but thats just circumstantial compared to the sheer rubbishness of the story!!!
-
-
PeterC.Dec 20, 20070
-
-
EvanA.Dec 20, 20070This will be the next Oscar contending, golden globe award winning masterpiece of the year, although the story basic's are uncompelled, boring, hard to watch being performed, weak, and corny status. They make this movie weird and awkward in taste, it is hard to get used to, and once it reaches initial incodent, things just get worse, it seems as though Tim Burton wants us to go home.
-
-
TommyC.Dec 20, 20070
-
-
WalterH.Dec 23, 20072
-
-
UncleDouglasB.Dec 23, 20070A powerful blunder of epic proportions. Like a horrendous train wreck, this smoldering pile drags on for eternity. Viewing this movie will cause boredom, nausea and increased blood pressure. Loss of self worth/respect is inevitable.
-
-
JenniferR.Dec 25, 20071
-
-
BobS.Dec 29, 20074Gore is excessive. Enjoyed stage version much more.
-
-
JimK.Dec 31, 20073
-
-
RonaldG.Jan 22, 20083Johnny Depp is always good and Sasha Cohen is wonderful in his short appearance, but how often can you watch Depp slit someone's throat? Can't wait for the copycat crimes!
-
-
ShaneCApr 25, 20084
-
-
MCDec 22, 20072
-
-
ScottSDec 23, 20074Far less intelligent, funny or dark than the recent Broadway revival, the film fails to realize that Sweeney Todd is as much about Mrs. Lovett as it is about Todd. They've dumbed it down to make it more "accessible", but it makes for a dull film. And Bonham Carter is, sadly, awful beyond description.
-
-
ArmondW.Dec 25, 20070This isn
-
-
DanaM.Dec 31, 20070Run, don't walk from this movie. If I could give this a minus rating I would. Can't say I've sat through a more dark gruesome morbid movie in many years. If your idea of a good movie is to view at least a dozen graphic throat slashings with spurting blood, then this is the movie for you. Contemptable at best.
-
-
Aug 27, 20123
-
90Teaming with Depp, his long-time alter ego, Burton makes Sweeney a smoldering dark pit of fury and hate that consumes itself. With his sturdy acting and surprisingly good voice, Depp is a Sweeney Todd for the ages.
-
80Both sharp and fleet, Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street proves a satisfying screen version of Stephen Sondheim’s landmark 1979 theatrical musical.
-
100Depp is such a soulful presence he gives you a glimpse of this maniac's pain and pathos. Bonham Carter is extraordinary. She reinvents Mrs. Lovett from the inside out.