- Studio: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
- Release Date: Oct 5, 2012
User Score
5.5
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 185 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 97 out of 185
-
Mixed: 42 out of 185
-
Negative: 46 out of 185
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
Nov 12, 20123Heart-breakingly bad. 'Taken' wasn't meant to have a sequel for a reason, and this is it.
-
Dec 24, 20120Everything that made the first film so good in gone. The writing is terrible, The acting is awful (Liam Neeson being the only good one), and it was incredibly corny and stupid. Not worth watching at all imo.
-
May 7, 20133
-
Oct 17, 20123
-
Oct 5, 20124
-
Dec 31, 20122
-
Mar 10, 20133I found this film to be just stupid. From the grenade throwing to the driving scenes to the pointless villains, there needed to be a different script. Liam Neeson is still good here, but I could have done with less of the family.
-
Jan 6, 20131Why! It was a great movie, why ruin it with this piece of **** Only the acting is good! Nothing else, not all sequels are good sometimes terrible follow great! This is one of great to terrible, two thumbs down!
-
Oct 13, 20123As far as by the numbers revenge movies go,
-
Jan 24, 20133
-
Apr 27, 20134
-
Oct 8, 20120This film did ok for the actors but for a movie that had a succesful rating for the first film this was dissapointing. the diretors and writers of this film did well with the location and scrips but as soon as the film started to pick up all u can expect is a relax in your chairs and not at all close to a thriller. this film for me personally was not worth the money i spent.
-
Dec 26, 20121Let's talk more generally about the trend in Luc Besson's films, in particular those written with Robert Mark Kamen. They are going downhill fast -- and faster. It's one thing to have a sequel here or there, and another to mail it in as RMK is doing.
-
Nov 12, 20123
-
Apr 9, 20134Well, you know, the first was great, but as usual sequels go on, this movie got me to think at one time "Does this even have a point?". It was kind of stupid, honestly, but because of the action sequences it brings, I'm gonna give it a 4, not to give it the red label.
-
Nov 12, 20124The whole time I was watching this movie I was waiting for the next big action scene. All I saw was a bunch of Liam Neeson chasing around his ex wife. An extremely disappointing sequel to a movie I really enjoyed.
-
Nov 5, 20124Taken 2 is not really a movie were you need a sequel. For me its a one liner. Its like making Titanic 2!? It runs out in cliches and do the same stuff he does in the first part. Its a okay action movie. If you can get the dvd for 5$, do it and watch it. But i don't think you'll watch it a multiple times.
-
Jan 23, 20133
-
Jan 14, 20132some movies just can't have sequels. other then the amazing Liam Neeson acting and Istanbul, every thing else is just so ridiculously crap. story line and plot so predictable. especially if you have watched the first one Taken, which was a good average movie, then this would be extremely difficult to watch.
-
Oct 7, 20122
-
Oct 16, 20122
-
Oct 6, 20122This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
Oct 7, 20120
-
70Somehow Neeson makes the ridiculous plausible. A mature, real man in an era of superhero fantasy, he radiates something rare in movie musclemen: a haunted gravity to match his outsize physique.
-
63The first half of Taken 2 is a serviceable action flick, but the second half descends into cliches.
-
30Luc Besson and Liam Neeson and the rest of the furriners who made the inept and offensive Taken 2 don't seem to have gotten the memo from Jason Bourne: Americans don't think our spooks are good guys anymore.