- Studio: Buena Vista Pictures
- Release Date: Apr 9, 2004
- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
91It's a well-crafted, intelligent, no-nonsense western epic that zips us through the famous siege and the birth of Texas with style, verve and impressive historical accuracy.
-
88It somehow succeeds in taking those pop-culture brand names like Davy Crockett and Jim Bowie and giving them human form.
-
75Alamo buffs will be delighted, and everyone else will be treated to something that feels like Old Hollywood crossed with new sensibilities.
-
70Politics aside, this is a handsome film with orange skies to die for, or under, and a lovely score by Carter Burwell. The picture has some ponderous and snooze-worthy stretches, but it attains a certain melancholic grandeur, with the actors and crew fighting as desperately as Crockett and Bowie to make the best of a fated adventure.
-
70Its egotistical, wishy-washy and otherwise flawed protagonists are no less heroic because they look -- and act -- like you and me. On the contrary, they are more so.
-
70Thoughtful and complex.
-
63Except for a handful of scenes, Hancock's film isn't good enough to be memorable. Neither is it bad enough to be entirely forgettable. It's just one of those compromised movies that makes one look forward to the director's cut.
-
63Thornton is excellent and now seems genetically incapable of being anything less than great in any role he takes.
-
63The real struggle in The Alamo is between historic revisionism and Hollywood notions of sacrifice, and it's not much of a contest: Hollywood wins, as it did in John Wayne's sprawling, factually spurious 1960 film.
-
60A respectable and at times an exciting film that should appeal to males of all ages, history buffs and -- yes, it's inevitable -- patriots.
-
60While the massacre is a wall-shaking and effective bit of high decibel drama, some of the movie's best moments come during the Texans' long brave wait for almost certain death.
-
60The result is something that feels very much like an overachieving made-for-TV movie--a history lesson dolled up like an action movie, with the action relegated to the final third, and even then, the battle is over before it really begins.
-
60Refreshingly revisionist in the sense that it takes a relatively clear-eyed view of the messy lives and equivocal circumstances of many of the key participants.
-
58Never harmonizes into a cinematic experience any more resonant than the average, manly, why-we-fight pic, or coalesces into a stirring cry for freedom.
-
Hancock's direction isn't flashy, and the pacing is a little curious...Still, he has the quiet chutzpah to suggest that a man can be both flawed and heroic, cowardly in his personal life and noble in his public one.
-
50A professionally made movie, just not an essential one. There's little fresh or provocative here, and if you can't be shaken by this story, why bother?
-
50Thornton lends gravity, focus and humor that are otherwise in short supply in this serious-minded but meandering, talky and action-deficient epic.
-
50The brave men who fought and perished at the Alamo believed fervently in their cause. For The Alamo to work, the audience must believe as well. That never really happens.
-
50The good news first: The Alamo is probably the most historically accurate depiction yet to reach the screen of the famous siege. The bad news is that "historically accurate" does not necessarily translate into "dramatically successful."
-
50Rousing? Sort of. Never before, one feels, have so few given so much for so much real estate.
-
50Thank goodness for Davy Crockett; without him, the Alamo could have proven the blandest heroic siege in movie history.
-
50Tries to be all things to all people and winds up a tedious muddle.
-
50Its The Alamo, all right, but will anyone want to remember it?
-
50Pinned down and smelling death, the men grow into fully realized human beings, which makes for some fine performances, but doesn't exactly propel this epic, richly detailed film forward. The battle, when it finally comes, is brief, admirably non-gory and rather dull.
-
50Turns into an edited-for-TV version of Sam Peckinpah's "The Wild Bunch"--flat, bloodless, and utterly bereft of period grit.
-
50Along the way, not just the storytelling but the original intention has gotten muddled. You leave The Alamo uncertain of what you're meant to feel: is this a celebration of patriotic sacrifice or an illustration of war's futility?
-
40Deserves credit for beautiful sets and the obvious care that went into reconstructing the old town of San Antonio de Bexar, as well as for Thorntons performance. Unfortunately, the stultifying dialogue and lack of real tension sink the film.
-
40In spite of two great performances, this is a muddled affair.
-
40As directed by John Lee Hancock, it's dull, talky, and sometimes maudlin.
-
40Driven by different agendas, history and movies often tell two irreconcilable stories, which is why, despite some glints of talent, Hancock has given us yet another film and another Alamo to forget.
-
40Thornton's performance is lost in a film that is more of a schematic success than a dramatic one.
-
40Thanks to Hancock's evasive storytelling, it's never clear why Houston moved so slowly or why so few Texians came to the Alamo's aid. The middle of the movie is pokey and unfocused--and, given the circumstances, bizarrely lacking in urgency.
-
40A misshapen semi-spectacle that seems to be simulating an epic, and getting away with it only occasionally.
-
38The studio wimped out, and the result is a lesser production on every level: talent, script, content, and purpose.
-
38As Disney-fied as "Pinocchio," barely challenging the images Americans have treasured for 150 years.
-
30These storied 13 days feel like the Hundred Years War.
-
25In short, it's dull, derivative, and as lifelike as a heap of historical figurines. Few will remember this Alamo for long.
-
25There is so much that is wrong with The Alamo that it is easier to begin with what the movie gets right: Davy Crockett. As played by Billy Bob Thornton.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 18 out of 32
-
Mixed: 3 out of 32
-
Negative: 11 out of 32
-
PatS.1
-
Louis'sbrother6Very good historical background, but needs more action.