Metascore
24 out of 100

Generally unfavorable - based on 16 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 0 out of 16
  2. Negative: 13 out of 16
  1. Reviewed by: Ty Burr
    50
    The result isn't art but it is an improvement: a scurrilous, lowdown, sub-Tarantino action comedy that, unlike the original, doesn't make you want to claw your eyes out. How's that for praise?
  2. Reviewed by: Mike Hale
    50
    Like its predecessor, All Saints Day will, if nothing else, be a cult item for Roman Catholic schoolboys; the next sequel, blatantly set up, should arrive no later than 2019.
  3. The only truly ugly side to this self-consciously grimy movie is the streak of Neanderthal humor. Operatic overacting is funny. Racist and homophobic jokes? Not so much.
  4. 38
    You wouldn't call The Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day a taut thriller. More like a fleshy, messy, jangled frenzy of shootouts and much discussion about the mechanics of romantic entanglements that bloom between prison inmates.
  5. The Boondock Saints II does, from time to time, display a vulgar charm. Or maybe it just wears you out.
  6. Although the Tarantino influence still is tangible, this time around Duffy reveals himself to also be a big Francis Ford Coppola fan, but the cartoonish end result plays like "Godfather III" meets the Three Stooges.
  7. Reviewed by: Aaron Hillis
    30
    John Woo outgrew stylizing movies like this in the '90s, but Duffy is still chasing his perfect slide-and-shoot, except now with more self-satisfied posturing, awkward pop-culture referencing, casual homophobia and racism, and the most vulgar co-opting of religious iconography this side of Dan Brown.
  8. Reviewed by: Robert Abele
    30
    Duffy tamps down his best instincts -- occasional wry humor and the appealingly oddball supporting character (Willem Dafoe last time, a bug-eyed Clifton Collins Jr. here as the MacManus' admiring Latino cohort) -- and doubles up on his worst: homophobic gags, tedious '90s-era slo-mo shootouts and overwrought gangster tropes.
  9. Reviewed by: Peter Debruge
    30
    Feels larger in scope yet sorely lacking in originality.
  10. 30
    After nine years, Duffy has coughed up a sequel, and like the first movie it's energetic, proudly juvenile, and reverently derivative.
  11. 25
    An idiotic ode to macho horseshite (to employ an ancient Irish word). It is however distinguished by superb cinematography.
  12. Just the same auld same auld.
  13. Reviewed by: Adam Markovitz
    25
    Earns points only for being remarkably unself-conscious about its across-the-board ineptitude.
  14. Only Billy Connolly, as the boys' way-of-the-gun pa, brings a smidgen of sobering gravitas to the proceedings, though he can hardly counter the pounding hangover brought on by all the mock-virtuous butchery.
  15. Reviewed by: Sam Adams
    16
    Duffy's inept command of actors, not to mention his utterly juvenile morality and his comically clumsy use of religious iconography, should keep all but the diehards away.
  16. 11
    Isn't for everyone, obviously; it might not be for anyone, come to think of it.
User Score

Generally favorable reviews- based on 78 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 18 out of 34
  2. Negative: 15 out of 34
  1. JasonW
    3
    Low rent Tarentino-esk rip-off with a thin plot and bad accents Whats with all the morons I've seen with VERITAS / AEQUITAS tats? Jesus, is everyone a *beep* slave to mass-media these days? I have nothing against tattoos, but if you are going to get one at least try to make it original. Full Review »
  2. MitchM
    4
    This movie is mildly entertaining but lacks the punch of the first movie. The critics will tear this apart and I can see why.
  3. Quentin Tarantino has taken some more worthy **** than this movie. Even fans of the first one will find little to cling on to, and bad dialogue makes the already bad acting just plain horrendous. Full Review »