- Studio: Apparition
- Release Date: Oct 30, 2009
User Score
6.1
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 78 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 46 out of 78
-
Mixed: 6 out of 78
-
Negative: 26 out of 78
Review this movie
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
JasonWNov 21, 20093Low rent Tarentino-esk rip-off with a thin plot and bad accents Whats with all the morons I've seen with VERITAS / AEQUITAS tats? Jesus, is everyone a *beep* slave to mass-media these days? I have nothing against tattoos, but if you are going to get one at least try to make it original.
-
-
MitchMNov 1, 20094This movie is mildly entertaining but lacks the punch of the first movie. The critics will tear this apart and I can see why.
-
-
MattC.Oct 30, 200910This movie is Boondock Saints 2. It lives up to its name. It's got awesome gun scenes, it's got the return of the original cast and it's funny as hell. This movie is a blast. If you loved the first one this movie is perfect for you. PS critics suck on sequels, listen to fans.
-
-
WillO.Oct 30, 20090Complete plastic Irish drivel from start to finish. Sub-normal fans of the original will probably like it but anyone with an IQ in at least double figures will hate it for what it is. Hey Troy, I'll have a beer and diet coke, keep the change you fool, cheers.
-
-
AQNov 1, 20098Great flick. Ignore Will O's racist tyrade. Good action, pacing, direction, everything.
-
-
DrewLNov 2, 200910Boondock Saints 2 lived up to the long awaited hype of a sequel. The humor found in this movie was not only entertaining but reminded people why they loved the first one to begin with. However I dont understand how critics even have jobs. They clearley lack any concept about what the consumer would like. This movie is a must see if you loved the first one.
-
-
DavidJNov 3, 20099This is one of the best movies. there guns were the best, Duff made a perfect film in all films. first on is ok, but the second one is great. i hope he makes a part 3.
-
-
BrianNNov 4, 20093Most people that liked BS will probably like this too, but it's pretty much just more BS. It isn't as bad as the first, but that might be because I expected nothing more than another ripoff of Guy Ritchie and Tarantino that required a very short attention span which is exactly what I got. Crap is worse when it catches you by surprise, and this time it didn't.
-
-
CoryPOct 30, 20090
-
-
BenCNov 1, 20099This movie rocks, its not supposed to be serious, its supposed to be a quote filled piss take with action in it, which is what it is, not as good as the first, but still good.
-
-
TomINov 2, 20091
-
-
NickONov 8, 20090Anyone with a brain should pass on this one.
-
-
EricEDec 5, 20098Just as good as the original in my mind. I enjoyed it quite a bit.
-
-
JDSOct 31, 20099right along the lines of the 1st movie, it has a great dark sence of humor, and delivers the its action covered in cheese. Basically if you liked the first movie your mostly enjoy this film. And on a side note Ricky (Rob Wells)from Trailer park boys was in it....so awesome.
-
-
CiaranBOct 31, 200910I love the first movie and the sequel does it justice then some, the only thing i would've changed was the actress portraying the F.B.I. agent that replaces agent Smecker. Other than her annoying accent this is everything Saint fans could have hoped for
-
-
jackm.Oct 30, 20090Matt C. offers up a little gem of advice here. "Critics suck on sequels, listen to fans". Thats about as intelligent and profound a statement as you can expect from a Boondock Saints fan.
-
-
ThomasFOct 30, 20099I'm not sure what movie the critics watched but this movie was on par with the first or better. Go see it if your a fan of the first don't let critics dissuade you. Its a politically incorrect shoot um up that does not pull its punches in action or comedy.
-
-
JohnFOct 30, 200910Awesome movie. If you loved the first one you will love this. Action and a spiritutual overtone are great. Love the brothers.
-
-
JohhnF.Nov 1, 20090Hey Matt C. I think you are forgetting Empire Strikes Back, Godfather Part 2, and The Dark Knight. Not all sequels are hated on.
-
-
TiffanyGNov 1, 200910
-
-
ColinG.Nov 1, 200910I loved the original and this was damned good. Do not listen to the folks who don't get it. If you like the original (a classic action flick IMHO) then this will deliver the goods as well. Kudos to Troy for giving his fans what they want.
-
-
ClaySNov 10, 200910As a fan of the first film. Boondock Saints 2 is a will-love for all Boondock fans. Overall, the film starts off slow, but come to a climax and says there. What makes it better is the surprise at the end.
-
-
RyanSNov 16, 20090If you like watching long meaningless scenes with just horrendous acting then look no further. This movie reminded me of one of those porns where you have to sit there furious with your dick in hand for 15 mins before you get to see the next hoe giving a BJ. But in this case the BJs are gun fights and most of the time the hoe turns out to be a tranny.
-
-
ArthurBNov 2, 20098Not as good as the first but retains most of the aspects of the original that made it so great! I saw the midnight release and it was time well spent! "Ding Dong!"
-
-
DumasRNov 2, 20090
-
-
DustySNov 3, 200910Potentially even better than the original. Great action sequences and all around the type of awesomeness we came to expect from the first film. If you didn't like the 1st one, you won't like the sequel, but if you loved the first, you'll love All Saints Day.
-
-
BilBNov 4, 20090This movie is Boondock Saints 2. I wish someone had told me before I went in that this was a gay porn film. I don't have anytihing against gay porn films because some of my best friends are gay porn stars but had I known all the gay sex this film had featured I'd might have taken my date to something more appropriate like Basic Instinct, Silence of the Lambs, or Saw 6.
-
-
CaseyMOct 31, 200910I absolutely loved this movie. Unlike many sequels, the ENTIRE same cast was present, and not much seemed to have changed. It didn't skip a beat, despite the 10-year gap. Dialogue and character interactions remained the same across both movies, as they should in a good sequel. It was like watching the first one, for the first time. Plus there's more rope.
-
-
TonyNov 13, 20097A good watch for the fans, but some of the magic is missing. The whole cast was pulled back in, the style was there but it's lacking that special something that made the first go from a B movie to a cult classic. Still worth going to see in theaters but I'd recommend a matinee.
-
-
MaxLNov 14, 20093much inferior to the original. Many styles but no substance and it was repetitious as heck with the flashback within action. Good looking movie can't help the stupid story. The end was exciting but could have come a lot sooner.
-
-
AhmadI.Nov 14, 20099The perfect sequel to one Hell of a movie.
-
-
RayBNov 17, 20092
-
-
Aug 16, 201011, for a good trailer. As far as the movie, a disappointment. After the first 25 minutes of it I cut it off. Bad acting, terrible jokes, typical story for a sequel. Its like if they were trying too hard to make it like the original, but couldn't hit the right notes. Definitly had the potential to be a very good movie, if it had good movie makers, but this is just another corny sequel.
-
Aug 27, 20100Quentin Tarantino has taken some more worthy **** than this movie. Even fans of the first one will find little to cling on to, and bad dialogue makes the already bad acting just plain horrendous.
prev
next
Page:
- 1
-
Duffy's inept command of actors, not to mention his utterly juvenile morality and his comically clumsy use of religious iconography, should keep all but the diehards away.
-
Earns points only for being remarkably unself-conscious about its across-the-board ineptitude.
-
25An idiotic ode to macho horseshite (to employ an ancient Irish word). It is however distinguished by superb cinematography.