- Studio: Universal Pictures
- Release Date: Jun 11, 2004
User Score
7.3
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 168 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 129 out of 168
-
Mixed: 13 out of 168
-
Negative: 26 out of 168
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
MarcW.Jun 10, 20040Nothing to say about this trash.
-
-
LawrenceR.Sep 5, 20041Boom! Boom! Bang! Stab! Slice! Punch! this review is as good as the film.
-
-
CraigS.Sep 8, 20041
-
-
DawnB.Jun 16, 20040Worst sci-fi film I have ever seen. There comes a point where you can't figure out what's going on and the bad new is, you don't care. Way too long.
-
-
EonfgeDMay 10, 20094The only thing that saves the movie from getting a lower score, is Riddick.
-
-
ChrisMAug 6, 20041Wow. This movie is really, really, really crap. A laughable story, a stupid ending and some of the worst special effects I have seen in a film for some time. What the heck were they thinking!?!?!? ARGH! I want my money back...
-
-
BillyS.Jun 13, 20040One word...SUCKS.
-
-
Sep 11, 201110Though the Riddick films are so under appreciated (it's a crime) I speak for real si-fi fans when I say that the Riddick series (video games included) is one of the greatest series of its genre.
-
JoshC.Jul 10, 200410
-
-
RavenX301Nov 21, 20056
-
-
PatC.Mar 20, 20064Starts out kinda need but becomes hard to follow as the plot becomes blurred by the action.
-
-
GerronKOct 3, 20040
-
-
JocelynJun 11, 20048Not Shakespeare, but a lot of fun. It's Indiana-Jones-meets-the-Matrix-meets-Star-Wars!
-
-
VinceH.Jun 12, 20043
-
-
JerryH.Jun 10, 20045
-
-
TraiD.Jun 13, 20049
-
-
DouglasH.Jun 13, 20048Good Movie! It has a good plot twist. It deserves a better score than what the critics are giving it.
-
-
LeorG.Jun 14, 20048The critics do not give this movie enough credit at all. It is an extremely interesting and fast-paced sci-fi action movie that keeps you interested all the way through. It is filled with plot twists and a very interesting and new type of action scene filming.
-
-
JoeyD.Jun 15, 20042Vin Diesel completionists need only see this film. It's a mess. The plot is pretty much non-existent and there is NO character development whatsoever. So much is left unexplained and the fight scenes are choppy and shot too close up. Vin Diesel has the emotional delivery of a baked potato. Hell, why not just replace him with one? They look pretty much the same.
-
-
RichardG.Jun 16, 20045
-
-
ConstatineJun 18, 20042
-
-
MarkD.Jun 21, 20048
-
-
GregA.Jun 20, 20048Sure it won't win any Oscars - but if you like sci-fi and action its real fun to watch.
-
-
MichaelR.Jun 20, 20046
-
-
TahraT.Jul 10, 200410A great follow up to Pitch Black and hoping for another!
-
-
AngelaC.Jul 15, 20049
-
-
Jok`RdeMoJul 4, 20043It is like XENA, but in future. Effects are great, but why the heck everybody is fighting with spears and knifes, when they have laser guns etc. And also armor - wow its kinda cool, very useless and you can see that it is not comfortable. Pitch black was good sci-fi, but Chronicles are bad fantasy movie.
-
-
SteveW.Jul 9, 200410This is one of the best action movies i have personally ever seen. I highly reccommmend this to anyone who likes action, and that has also seen the first movie "Pitch Black."
-
-
JoshE.Oct 31, 20052
-
-
DominicT.Jan 5, 20059Loved it, brilliant film as good as the original film pitch black, good special affects and brilliant story line.
-
-
50This is a movie so devoted to metal that it couldn't care less about the flesh it destroys.
-
25There's nothing here you haven't seen before, especially if you own a PlayStation.
-
38An overblown hodgepodge of volcano-baked desertscapes, Egyptoid-gone-baroque architecture, and gladiator-geared storm troopers with goofy headpieces, The Chronicles of Riddick bears no resemblance to the movie that spawned its namesake.