- Studio: Focus Features
- Release Date: Aug 31, 2005
User Score
6.9
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 232 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 162 out of 232
-
Mixed: 22 out of 232
-
Negative: 48 out of 232
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
TigranH.Mar 20, 20064
-
-
RamonaCOct 25, 20050Boring and ridiculous premise in every way. Moronic and overhyped. Avoid.
-
-
HinckleyA.Sep 11, 20050
-
-
AlvinSep 13, 20053
-
-
ChrisS.Feb 5, 20063Very over-rated. Very slow. Very over-the-top. Just when you thought it was about sex it switched to a thriller--WITH RALPH FIENNES?? come on...that man does a lot of boring shows.
-
-
AndrewW.Sep 14, 20053
-
-
JasonH.Sep 19, 20050Jack open your eyes. It was a horrible film, slow, tedious and very boring. And that was its good points. What truth were you referring to? The Hollywood spin zone? Do you really think pharmaceutical companies are hell bent on murdering underpriviledged third world nations? If you do I have a bridge to sell you! Awful movie in every sense of the word.
-
-
JakeS.Sep 23, 20053Rachel weisz is stunning, but the tale is poorly crafted and suffers from no plausibly explained threat, other than a vague machinery of TB proliferation. making this an amazing film takes much effort on the part of the viewer. so, suspend your disbelief and enjoy this film!!
-
-
TedM.Sep 30, 20054Dreadfully slow and preachy, I thought that even the Nicholas Cage film "Lord of War" had a more mature (and entertaining) perspective on Western exploitation of Africa.
-
-
AndrewK.Sep 5, 20053
-
-
KrisSep 5, 20053I felt that the problem with the movie is that it just doesn't make sense that Tessa wouldn't have contacted newspapers with her suspicions rather than going through "diplomatic" channels. So for me, it just wasn't very realistic.
-
-
jackr.Sep 7, 20051A blunt instrument.
-
-
RexSep 8, 20053Drawn out, but well acted. So predictable and takes a year to get to the conclusion. Plot holes galore. Ho hum is the best way to describe this very forgettable movie.
-
-
GabrielK.Mar 4, 20060Bad acting, bad script, switched it off after half an hour before it ruined my night. It was so full of it's own self importance yet so bad it was unbelievable. A complete insult to anyone with a brain. The opening 'interaction' between the two leads set the level for the whole film.
-
-
PatC.Mar 6, 20063
-
-
KelvinlNov 24, 20053
-
-
LarryOct 13, 20050The most boring overrated overhyped movie of the year. Awful and preposterous.
-
-
GabeS.Oct 19, 20051
-
-
DetroitSep 15, 20052Awful, slow and boring.
-
-
CarlCSep 19, 20053I thought it was incredibly boring. Kept waiting for something to happen and nothing ever did. Great cinematography though. They should call this movie "beautiful footage of Ralph Fiennes riding in cars".
-
-
TyroneL.Sep 22, 20050Absolutely awful. Boring to the point that I wanted to puke. No chemistry at all between the stars. Overacted and sensationilized against the drug companies. Give me a beak as I could hardly keep my eyes open. Avoid.
-
-
JoeSep 2, 20053
-
-
JasonN.Sep 25, 20050The most incredibly boring movie I have ever seen in life. A significant number of people gave up and walked out during the movie.
-
-
HairstonSep 8, 20052Way overrated to suit my taste. Quite frankly put me to sleep.
-
-
JamesB.Jan 29, 20060Slow? I walked out on this, and it was playing on my TV. After 45 minutes in, just a low-grade soap opera. If you have the patience to stick with it, maybe you'll like it more. My time is much too valuable. This is what I get for listening to other reviews.
-
-
BorisC.Jan 31, 20064I'm not sure which would be more exciting watching this movie again or being in a coma or 2 hours. I do believe it would be the coma.
-
-
BurkeFeb 3, 20064
-
-
MikeR.Feb 18, 20070This was the SLOWEST MOST BORING movie I have ever seen. If you didn't see the movie I'll save you two hours. Drug companies are bad. There that's it, that's all the movie had to say. Terrible movie.
-
-
RirenMar 17, 20073
-
-
AdrianNov 16, 20051Awful but beatiful scenery.
-
-
88Director Fernando Meirelles and screenwriter Jeffrey Caine put a human face on John le Carre's novel of sex, lies and dirty politics in modern Africa. Prepare for a thrilling ride.
-
80His (Fernando Meirelles) impressionistic, guerilla style of filmmaking works surprisingly well in capturing the hypnotic urgency of le Carre's fiction. And his viewpoint is less British and more Third World.
-
80Succeeds in capturing the book's essential themes and concerns, albeit in a hectic style that could not be more antithetical to that of the literary master of international intrigue.