- Studio: Paramount Pictures
- Release Date: Dec 25, 2008
User Score
7.0
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 396 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 284 out of 396
-
Mixed: 37 out of 396
-
Negative: 75 out of 396
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
SamS.Mar 6, 200910Get ready to cry. This movie deserves more than a 70, proving that the "critics" are not always correct.
-
-
AndrewG.Aug 7, 200910Such a Magical movie, with a great cast, and an inspiring and emotional concept. Beautifully crafted, it deserved best picture.
-
-
Oct 16, 20109Crafting a story like this is a feat that is rarely seen in cinema. There is a real chemistry between Pitt and Blanchett and this is coupled by a storyline which gripped me as soon as I had seen the trailer. The story never gets old, much the same as its protagonist.
-
Jan 19, 20129
-
TimMJan 7, 20098A mesmerising and heartwarming film from start to finish. There is no big message perhaps apart from enjoying every moment of life while you can and appreciating it in all it's richness. Go see.
-
-
TonyB.Jan 6, 20099Extremely well-acted, meticulously designed, beautifully photographed, meaningful and quite moving, a mature film for mature adults...who could ask for anything more?
-
-
JayHMay 2, 20098Impressive production - the art direction, make-up, and cinematography are magnificent. Brad Pitt is amazing. The story is fascinating. It did seem it's 2 1/2 hour length, a little cutting would have helped, but overall a top notch film that is outstanding.
-
-
PaulF.Jan 19, 20099
-
-
JohnH.Jan 29, 20098
-
-
Aug 28, 20115
-
Jan 23, 20138Very good movie. Cry, your heart will suffer, but not leave wing time to enjoy.
-
SteveBJan 1, 20094Don't believe the hype! This is not a very good movie. Similar to Forrest Gump, but less engaging. An epic tale about a boy born old, grows up and gets younger as ages, this theme has actually very little to do with the plot, and is really a skeleton on which to hang a a rather dull, rambling story. Brad and Cate are nice to look at, but it's a snoozer with no real conclusion.
-
-
DTJan 3, 20094It was the same crap that gets eaten up by award judges every year. Nothing new.
-
-
ArjunS.Dec 30, 20088
-
-
AlanD.Jan 29, 20093
-
-
GregoryR.Jan 3, 20099Great movie. Visually stunning, moving, and a great adaptation to a bland short story that works itself into a masterful screenplay. Director, David Fincher, does an excellent job with atmosphere, New Orleans is shown in new light. Great movie, one of the best of 2008.
-
-
RobertA.Jan 30, 200910It was very uplifting and had a moral to the story, which is unusual nowadays.
-
-
LawrenceH.Jan 5, 20096This movie is just too long. I don't have a problem with long movies when there is a justifiable reason for the length...
-
-
RonD.Jan 5, 200910Visually breathtaking.
-
-
JoetheCriticJan 7, 20094Absurdly long, I was glad it was over. The movie was nothing more of a love story, and had nothing to do with the actual reason to why he was born an old man. Don't waste your time. Too much hype for such a dull movie.
-
-
aideenMFeb 10, 20092Boring, trite--with absolutely no character development or insight. Nearly 3 hours of tedium with excellent special effects. But who goes to the movies for merely special effects?
-
-
JamesH.Feb 6, 20091The film seemed to have no point other than to show authentic costumes and sets from its various time periods. I felt no connection to the characters during the almost 3 hour running time. Did the story have a point?
-
-
elpMay 31, 20095Can't fault the art direction, cinematography, or the acting, but it's three hours of one depressing scenario after another. if there's anything to take away from it it's that everything is pointless and doomed to misery, not exactly a feel-good movie.
-
-
HollycMay 30, 20095
-
-
BobbyB.Jul 26, 20095
-
-
JimL.Jan 1, 200910Engaging, moving. Terrific soundtrack.
-
-
RonL.Jan 15, 20093It never ended. It was a rehash of Gump. It was flat out boring. IIf you do want to see it wait for it on Netflix. Not worth the ordeal.
-
-
JohnHartmanJan 16, 20092This entire movie is like the ending of "The return of the King", multiplied by 1000.
-
-
HelenaO.Jan 24, 20090This was the worst movie I have seen in my life. I am so mad that its getting all the Oscar nominations, because Brad Pitt can't act, and the actor couldn't string together a good story to save his life. What was with the guy getting struck by lighting? Did that have a point? And please do NOT compare it to Forrest Gump, because that was a masterpiece, and Button was garbage.
-
-
CarlyU.Jan 3, 200910My best film for 2008. david fincher is genius. cate is wondergul actress.
-
-
90Lyrical, original, misshapen and deeply felt, this is one flawed beauty of a movie.
-
100Superbly made and winningly acted by Brad Pitt in his most impressive outing to date.
-
80This odd, epic tale of a man who ages backwards is presented in an impeccable classical manner, every detail tended to with fastidious devotion.