Metascore
62 out of 100

Generally favorable reviews - based on 19 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 10 out of 19
  2. Negative: 1 out of 19
  1. An excessive, expressionistic, agreeably nonjudgmental period biography that carries with it an enormous emotional wallop. [01 Mar 1991]
  2. Reviewed by: Ted Mahar
    91
    As writer/director, he manages to make both Morrison and the period seem real without being self-conscious, an observed milieu rather than a film set. [01 Mar 1991]
  3. 88
    The Doors is a thrilling spectacle - the King Kong of rock movies - featuring a starmaking, ball-of-fire performance by Val Kilmer as Morrison.
  4. Reviewed by: Jay Carr
    88
    Stone's film rolls off the screen with affection and authority, even when Morrison's life enters its sodden, bummed-out finale, and Val Kilmer does an uncanny job of identifying with Morrison. [01 Mar 1991]
  5. The Doors is excessive, unsubtle, emotionally brutal and stylistically sadistic, but that's exactly right for the dark side of the sixties Morrison and his band embodied. [01 Mar 1991]
  6. It's one hell of a ride and a real, roaring rock movie. [01 Mar 1991]
  7. Reviewed by: Joe Brown
    80
    It's a slick, smarter than average biopic.
  8. Oliver Stone's film paints a reasonably complex portrait of Morrison's life and times. [01 Mar 1991]
  9. 63
    The experience of watching The Doors is not always very pleasant.
  10. Reviewed by: Mike Clark
    63
    Kilmer seems less dangerous than Morrison, but it's a blessing in the most uncompromising bio of a please- don't-move-next-door type since "Raging Bull." [01 Mar 1991]
  11. Reviewed by: Angie Errigo
    60
    Val Kilmer is extraordinary as Morrison, holding the centre with a demonic charisma, while Stone recreates the late '60s milieu with vibrant versimilitude.
  12. 50
    Hysteria, however skillfully maintained, should never be mistaken for art-a caution that applies equally to Stone and his subject. [01 Mar 1991]
  13. Reviewed by: Staff (Not Credited)
    50
    By recreating things too well, the film itself becomes as boring, indulgent and over-stuffed as its hero.
  14. Reviewed by: Stephen Hunter
    50
    You don't see The Doors, you survive it. [01 Mar 1991]
  15. Reviewed by: Staff (Not Credited)
    50
    This $40 million look at Jim Morrison's short, wild ride through a rock idol life is everything one expects from the filmmaker - intense, overblown, riveting, humorless, evocative, self-important and impossible to ignore.
  16. 50
    I don't care what Dylan said, everyone must not get Stoned.
  17. The movie does a pretty good job with period ambience. But it's a long haul waiting for the hero to keel over.
  18. Reviewed by: Caryn James
    40
    It is made by a Morrison groupie for other groupies, a film that leaves the rest of us locked outside wondering what the fuss is about.
  19. Reviewed by: Richard Corliss
    20
    Maybe it was fun to bathe in decadence back then. But this is no time to wallow in that mire.
User Score

Generally favorable reviews- based on 13 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 0 out of 1
  2. Negative: 0 out of 1
  1. j30
    5
    The making of the rock band is pretty invigorating stuff, however the Jim Morrison biography is uninviting and kind of boring after a while. I thought the movie was called The Doors, not The Rise And Fall Of The Lizard King. Full Review »