User Score
2.7
out of 10
Generally unfavorable- based on 9 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 2 out of 9
-
Mixed: 0 out of 9
-
Negative: 7 out of 9
Review this movie
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
SheilaGFeb 14, 20080If there were negative points available for ratings of movies, this one would be at least a negative 10.
-
-
BrianM.Feb 27, 200810I liked it a lot and think you are all being a bit to harsh on it. Yes there were some production flaws but I thought the characters got it right.
-
-
GRApr 28, 20073Roger Corman-esque dialogue & board-stiff performances can't overcome the fantastic locations in this low budget Western. 3 widows can't decide between running or fighting, all while they're on the run & fighting! B+ for effort, A+ for the beautiful New Mexico locale, but the acting & dialogue really made me squirm.
-
-
andyoFeb 23, 20080The acting in this movie sucked so bad I felt emberrased watching this movie. The lines sounded like they were being read from story boards off set. The story was predictable. If you want to watch a movie to see just how bad one can be, this is the one.
-
-
SteveL.Nov 23, 20071Quite possibly the worst movie I have ever seen. Poor acting, bad dialogue, and a terrible plot.
-
prev
next
Page:
- 1
-
60The movie gives every cheerful appearance of having been shot with no time and less money, and it doesn't have much on its mind, unless you count the moral integrity supplied by local Apaches more by way of Mel Brooks than Howard Hawks.
-
While the three actresses have an appealing grittiness, they aren't always up to the demands of the roles.
-
Unengaging and uninspired and that leaves far too much unexplored.