- Studio: Sony Pictures Entertainment (SPE)
- Release Date: May 9, 1997
- Critic Score
- Most active
- Publication
- Most clicked
-
80The cast is a delight, but it's Willis who is the film's true "fifth element," giving it life, depth and humanity.
-
80An entertaining tangle of pop aesthetic and comic book myth that occasionally bogs down, but manages to be ingratiating for all its defects.
-
78Although the film tends to suffer from a severe case of overt preachiness in the third reel (shades of James Cameron's "The Abyss"), it's still a wonderfully visual, exciting ride.
-
75I would not have missed seeing this film, and I recommend it for its richness of imagery. But at 127 minutes, which seems a reasonable length, it plays long.
-
75It's ludicrous, but it's fun. Besson is a filmmaker so in love with his own daffy excesses that he's able to pull us, laughing, right into his world of loony pop. [9 May 1997]
-
75What an attempt, and what a work of the imagination. The Fifth Element' will change the look of science fiction and will probably be imitated for years.
-
70Too long by half, burdened with shabby F/X and offering up some seriously weird performances, this pricy foray into science fiction is a muddle of miscues and narrative bloat--along with a lot of frivolous fun.
-
70Theres so much high-voltage fun running throughout this comic sci-fantasy -- engineered gleefully by director Luc Besson -- youre hard-pressed to be unaffected.
-
67The future-shock details are witty, the sets and skyscapes spectacular. Besson may not be a good director, exactly, but he's a wizard at retrofitting cliches.
-
63The movie unreels like a depressive in a manic phase, a frenzy of lightning-fast cuts, cuts, cuts.
-
50The action is fast, furious, and as wacky as science fantasy gets.
-
This is a prodigious something. It's just difficult to say whether that something is good or evil.
-
50But for all the fancy-schmancy effects (budget: $90 million-plus), the vision of a hypercongested metropolis is not much more sophisticated than an episode of "The Jetsons." [9 May 1997]
-
50Besson may have misfired with The Fifth Element, but at least he does it with flair and a sense of humor.
-
50It's all densely imagined and more than a little goofy -- perhaps too goofy for the average American viewer.
-
50The story is such a cut-rate kid's sci-fi fairy tale that at one point Evil actually calls Gary Oldman on the phone (and it isn't played for laughs).
-
50As a yammering, swishy talk show host, Chris Tucker is flat-out incomprehensible, while Mr. Oldman preens evilly enough to leave tooth marks on the scenery.
-
With Besson, it's all eye candy; despite all of his mythic posturing, his loop-the-loop camera moves and in-your-face fandangos are the true substance of his films. And that's not much substance. He's a dry-hump orgiast.
-
40Ultimately a mess of diverse ingredients that sorely could have used a rigorous screening process to eliminate all the chaff.
-
30Even the revelation of what the fifth element is at the end is disingenuous--in fact, the archness of this whole project is repellent.
-
20It may or may not be the worst movie ever made, but it is one of the most unhinged.
-
10As you sit through the interminable two-hours-plus that constitute The Fifth Element -- a colossally stupid, overbearingly pompous new movie by Luc Besson -- you can expect to become acquainted with boredom on the most elemental level.
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 29 out of 33
-
Mixed: 1 out of 33
-
Negative: 3 out of 33
-
10
-
10
-
JakeM10Awesome awesome AWESOME MOVIE! It's clever, well-acted, hilarious and everything else you can think of.