Advanced Search Beta »
Basic Search Fields
The Forgotten
User Score
5.5 out of 10

Mixed or average reviews- based on 114 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 58 out of 114
  2. Mixed: 12 out of 114
  3. Negative: 44 out of 114

Review this movie

  1. Your Score
    10 out of 10
    Rate this:
    out of 10
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling

  3. Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000

view
per page
  1. Lopez17
    Aug 11, 2010
    5
    What if someone told you that your child never existed that it was all just apart of your imagination that you dreamed up a happy life, with a happy little boy/girl. Then one day you wake up and that child is suddenly forgotten pictures, videos, friends everyone who knew your child suddenly has forgotten that he/she ever existed. Joseph Ruben's "The Forgotten" explores themes relating to the above statement, Ruben's film tells the story of a grieving mother named Telly Paretta (Julianne Moore) who fourteen months ago lost her nine-year-old son Sam in a plane crash and every day she goes to her and looks at his precious baseball cap and catcher’s mitt. One day she wakes up and finds that a photo of her, Sam and her husband Jim (Anthony Edwards) been replaced with a photo of just her and Jim, and then home movies of Sam are suddenly blank. Soon her Husband, Her psychiatrist (Gary Sinise), her neighbors soon have no recollection of there ever being a Sam Paretta. Telly soon sets out to find if her son really existed or if it all was just an illusion. Joseph Ruben's "The Forgotten” is a well thought out but poorly executed Sci-Fi mystery with a premise that at times is so ludicrous you can barely take this film seriously. it at times feels like a poorly constructed Twilight Zone episode all it is missing is Rod Sterling creepy prologue monologue and a black and white opening with the Twilight zone theme. I felt lost at times and at others I felt like this film was trying to be the new "Matrix", so to speak, it had that type of feel to it like it was ripping off two great sci-Fi titans and that just pulled me even further from the story the film was trying to tell. Don't get me wrong I liked the ideas the film has and I also like the premise of the film but it felt distant, emotionless and bland I felt nothing for the characters and the fact they lost there children; it was like the film was trying, on purpose. To make you distance yourself from the characters and from the situation at hand. That is where this film fails. It strings you along for a 1hr. 31mis until this big twist ending that is not so much of a stretch to figure out “The Forgotten" is a SyFy channel T.V. movie with little to nothing to offer. There times in this movie that you will feel for the characters and then there are times that you just want the characters to be forgotten, this film to be forgotten and in all ways this film is a very forgettable ride that offers nothing more beyond the standard thrills and no chills. Even though it has a very believable victim (Julianne Moore), Moore cannot save the film from the hell that is underwhelming Science Fiction. However, the credit must be given where it is due, she does try her hardest but she fails to deliver when her true talent is needed. “The Forgotten” works to entertain but only for a little while. Julianne Moore is a fantastic actress she has done some fine films that are instantly recognizable; "Boogie Nights"(1997), "The Hours""(2002),” Far from Heaven"(2002). However, here I feel like she took this film solely for the gig as if she did not have any other better films to do. I liked her in this but I felt like she was not trying, as if she was being held back by something. In any case, Moore fails to impress or even convince us of her grief for her lost son it is just her for 1 hr. 31min of her running around yelling at people and screaming, "Where is my son?” "Do you know my son?”Do you remember my son?" it becomes too repetitive and annoying for any audience member to take seriously. Moore has done better, much better and while there are some times she is good in this film those moments are not frequent enough for a persuasive performance. Moore falls flat on her face. The rest of the cast including Christopher Kovaleski, Jessica Hecht, Dominic West, Gary Sinise and Linus Roache they all deliver poor performances (Roache being the exception) in a film that blows your mind with its blandness and poor execution. "The Forgotten" has the perfect title to describe this films dull and contrived story as soon as it's over and you move on to something else you complete forget that you ever saw this film and when you see a glimpse of it and remember your thankful that you forgot in the first place. It's not good entertainment, hell it's not entertainment at all it's just people running from other people and a twist ending you figure out in the first twenty minutes of the film, "The Forgotten" is ultimately forgettable.… Expand
  2. ChadS.
    Oct 3, 2004
    3
    Contrary to this film's belief, all mothers, not to mention fathers too, would still mourn for their child after eleven months have passed. Julianne Moore, on occasion, is an extraordinary actress, and it's a waste of her considerable talents, when she has to run away from danger, or look sad in flashbacks. We can see it coming from a mile away, as to what the flashbacks will reveal. "The Forgotten" has that same everything but the kitchen sink approach to screenwriting that "Dreamcatcher" had. The film abandons its "Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind" reconfigured as a thriller approach, with a sci-fi explanation for this mystery that's truly stupefying. I suppose the aliens got bored with anal probes, so now they're into emotional sadism. … Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  3. TylerD.
    Jul 4, 2005
    9
    The Forgotten is a really great movie. It made me jump a few times, especially the transport crash and when the people get blown into the sky. Really great movie!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  4. Meat
    Oct 5, 2004
    3
    This movie was pretty horrible... just a complete mess. My word, it couldn't figure out if it was a mystery/suspense or a Sci-Fi horror movie. Also, you really got tired of Juilianne sobbing throughout the whole thing. Near the end you couldn't help but laugh because of how stupid it was becoming. As my date said on the way out... "this is not even a good rental."
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  5. KatieP
    Sep 26, 2004
    10
    Don't listen to these stuck up, pretentious critics. It was a good movie, and very scary at times. I was so scared I couldn't even look at the screen at one point. I recommend you see it if you like this kind of movie.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  6. TK
    Sep 29, 2004
    8
    I am guess I am nuts...but I thought this was a pretty good flick. If you are an X-files you will like it even more. There were some pretty good moments and the story in whole was good. I would say go see it.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  7. RobertJ.
    Mar 23, 2005
    8
    I watched this on my HD 65 inch TV and I have to say I jumped out of my seat a few times. I knew nothing about the film not even a preview. Anyone remotely interested in ET visitations will love it. Its much better than people saying about it. We could be lab rats right now, there is that hint of this could be true. Similar to movies like the exorcist. Religious people were very disturbed when that came out. The non science fiction people should not see this as it will have zero appeal.… Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  8. wooo.
    Apr 3, 2005
    10
    Better than the sixth sense. Gripping all the way through.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  9. TinaA.
    Jun 1, 2006
    10
    Are you people insane? This movie was amazing, and one of the best thrillers ever! Ms. Moore was spectacular!
    • 0 of 1 users said yes
  10. TonyM.
    Nov 4, 2004
    10
    I Like This Movie It Waz Good I Think That Juliann Morre Did A Great Job At This Movie (srry Dont how to spell her name) But Overall I Think This Waz A Great Movie Because It Teaches U Stuff That U Have Not Realized Before And So Thats Why I Think This Is A Good Movie.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  11. Stephanie
    Oct 14, 2004
    0
    The average score is a 6? If you read this reviews the average is about a minus ten. This is so lame with the stupidest ending I have ever seen in a movie. How bad was it? As they had the gall to say in the flick, "ya, really don't wanna know."
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  12. Kitos
    Nov 8, 2004
    0
    One of the worst movies ever!!! Waste of money and time!!!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  13. Carol
    Oct 18, 2004
    0
    So lame that I demanded a refund in a half empty theater. The management gave it to me and apologized. Awful!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  14. CarlosR.
    Oct 3, 2004
    0
    So slow that you would welcome watching moss grow on a rock. The ending is completely lame making the entire movie more irritable. In a single word...Awful.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  15. WendelC.
    Oct 7, 2004
    0
    I can't remember if I saw this movie as it is already forgotten. I do know that if I did, it put me to sleep early.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  16. Rick
    Oct 9, 2004
    1
    Wow how could they copy a movie like that and try and say its as good as The Sixth Sense. Please, THIS MOVIE IS A PURE RIPOFF OF DARK CITY. If you really wanna see a Sci-Fi movie that has killer acting, effects, and makes sense, go watch DARK CITY. For me i wasted my money and time watching This Forgotten bull****. Why do people watch a good movie and say "you know what lets take that idea and make a crappy movie.Thanks Joseph Ruben, next time try and steal something from The Lord Of The Rings or something so your movie can at least be watchable.… Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  17. PharrellH.
    Sep 23, 2004
    7
    Ultimately this is a worthwhile effort, although the resolution is both predictable and unsatisfying to say the least. There are several key moments during the course of the first hour or so when the audience will be jolted, making this a great date/popcorn flick or rental upon dvd release. Credit the director and editor for those. Julianne Moore and West are believable as VERY static characters, while Sinise, Woodard, and Edwards are given smaller bit parts in a movie with nothing but bit parts. Just wished there was more to the plot, or what little presented here was more carefully fleshed out. … Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  18. BobH.
    Sep 23, 2004
    2
    I was invited to watch a private screening of this film yesterday. I don't know where to begin? The acting was third rate and the actors simply sleepwalk through their lines. Anthony Edwards as the husband is an emotionless zombie. Who would want to be married to a person like him? The trailer which showed promise is the ENTIRE movie. Everything is telegraphed and totally predictable. The first thirty minutes is forever and puts you to sleep. Midway through the film they have a good special effect that will wake you up if you are just dozing? But soon after, they repeat it, but by then you know you are watching a turkey and have been had. As for the ending, well, let's just say that the movie is FORGOTTEN the minute the credits start to roll. Doesn't even make a good cable movie. Preposterous. Avoid at all costs.… Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  19. Mickeray
    Sep 25, 2004
    0
    Bad is an understatement for this woeful mess of a movie. Can't believe it was ever made? You have been warned!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  20. Jack
    Sep 26, 2004
    10
    Great plot, great acting, great movie.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  21. Lassiter
    Sep 26, 2004
    0
    Somebody place bamboo shoots in my eyes as that is how bad a movie this was. If the beginning wasn't boring enough, the ending was a complete joke. As for the middle, I didn't know whether to laugh or cry as the acting was putrid. This dud was forgotten the minute I left the theater. Just awful.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  22. DCleve
    Jan 18, 2005
    4
    I saw this in the theatres and was very dissapointed. I felt no connection with the story or any of its characters. I'm a big sci-fi guy, so for this film to totally miss me is remiss on its behalf.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  23. JoeB.
    Feb 13, 2005
    8
    The movie definitely deserves more than it's gotten. It was pretty suspenseful with a different story.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  24. JonathanZ.
    Jul 18, 2005
    8
    A movie enjoyed best when you don't know anything about how it will turn out. Too bad the critics (professional and amateur) are giving away the danger. I suspected several people before the film disclosed the villains. And by the way, what's wrong with a deus ex machina once in a while? It was good enough for the ancient Greeks, and their stories certainly stand above most of the garbage our culture produces.… Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  25. BrianH.
    Apr 10, 2006
    3
    I am now dumber for having watched this. The digital cable review said "watch for the twist ending!" I am still waiting.....for the two hours of my life I wasted on this movie back.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  26. Jennifer
    Oct 11, 2004
    0
    Are they serious? Anyone with even average intelligence would have found this film insulting? Just awful and simply ridiculous. I fell asleep.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  27. AutumnL.
    Oct 1, 2004
    10
    Awesome Movie. Great Plot, great effects, and excellent acting. If you don't go see it you are missing one of the best movie experiences of the year. It is that good.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  28. Fusichinucca
    Oct 12, 2004
    0
    I wish I had FORGOTTEN to see this trailer trash. As a matter of fact, if you saw the thirty seconds of the trailer, then you saw the entire movie. Too bad for words. Disintigrates before your very eyes.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  29. IsaacA.
    Oct 28, 2004
    0
    This is the worst movie ever . this waste of time has no story , no performance , is just the worst case of misliding advertising ever. the six sense has nothing to do with this.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  30. LarryR.
    Oct 3, 2004
    4
    As if the writer of the screen play had a better ending but the budget ran out. "Just blow 'em into the sky;" ok, we are outta here!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  31. BobB.
    Oct 9, 2004
    2
    Perhaps one of the worst endings in movie history. Not one question answered putting an end to what could have been a good movie. THe last 20 minutes brought the movie from a 7 to almost a 0.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  32. Fantasy
    Sep 24, 2004
    1
    Who makes these movies? After seeing this dud it is one of the lamest films ever made. For the actors they just picked up a paycheck and ran. The script has more holes than swiss cheese. As the storyline moves along any questions you may have are NEVER answered. The ending is so bad it is like eating cold soup. Don't waste your time or money.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  33. SandyF.
    Sep 25, 2004
    10
    When I saw the ending I was blown out of my seat. I think most people who rate the film fail to see the film by itself without comparing it to other films. The implications in the film require intelligence to understand. The film makes you work...quite hard in a good way to understand its hidden meanings.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  34. Larrie
    Sep 26, 2004
    0
    Sandy, if you could rate this film a perfect ten as in "Gone With The Wind," you are in desperate need of some professional help. Perhaps Gary Sinise who plays the psychiatrist in the film can help you. As he said, "You don't want to know." The worst movie of the year so far. It is laughable as is your review of the movie. Sandy, you are forgotten.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  35. Harriet
    Sep 26, 2004
    0
    Are they serious? Perhaps one of the the stupidest movies I've seen in a long time. Time, he needs more time. Forgotten is outta here.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  36. JodeG.
    Sep 26, 2004
    9
    Before i saw this film i was worried that it was gonna be crap. I had quickly glanced a lot of really bad reviews and was sure it was going to have an ending that just ruined anything that lead up to it. However....that was not the case. I feel critics who dismissed this movie went into it expecting one thing and when the film took a turn into another genre, they cried foul. Some superb acting, great special effects, intense action and some seriously scary moments make for a kick-ass movie experience. Different than anything out there, The Forgotten is definately worth a watch.… Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  37. Amber
    Sep 26, 2004
    0
    8.6 score by the Metacritic public? Absolutely impossible as there has to be a mistake. After seeing this disaster last night, we were all walking out of the theater shaking our heads and avoiding eye contact for fear of being recognized as stupid enough to have bought a ticket. I only wish I could have had a bag to place over my head? Quite possibly, one of the worst movies ever made. Only an idiot who watches "moss grow on a rock" could have found any redeeming value in this garbage. Avoid at all costs.… Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  38. Dan
    Sep 26, 2004
    0
    Yuk, I think I want to puke.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  39. KevinF.
    Sep 28, 2004
    5
    Sleeper hit of the year - - and by that, I mean you'll sleep through it.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  40. Benjithegreat
    Jan 30, 2005
    1
    This movie is attrocious. The acting completely sucks, while the plot is uninteresting, predictable, and unfullfilling.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  41. BethW
    Jan 31, 2005
    6
    Yes, the ending is ridiculous, but if you know that going in then you can enjoy this movie. Good acting by Moore and a great car accident scene.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  42. PeterJ.
    Feb 17, 2005
    7
    This movie is nowhere near as bad as the critics and users say it is. While the ending was not very good (which those making the movie knew it wasn't so they added an alternative ending,) the rest of the movie was very suspensful and had me on edge up until the ending. I also agree that the car crash sceen was excellent! I don't want to ruin it but there is another worthwhile seen that may jolt some out of their seats! Good movie overall. Bad ending.… Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  43. AMovieCritic
    Feb 5, 2005
    4
    This movie just wasn't a good one. It lacked scares, and lacked suspense! It was boring. When a movie makes even things like Aliens seem common and boring, you know there's a problem. The plot was impossible to believe, and so weird and stupid! I give the movie 4 points because it had some cool moments. (None of which I can spoil) but otherwise, it was boring! The movie even lacks a climax. You may be amazed to see the credits roll. It seems to be building up to something huge...but it never happens. Everything is EXACTLY as it seems. It's boring. The Forgotten is an OK movie that, unfortunately, seemed to play on autopilot. Plus, it ends after a very weak climax. Not recommended.… Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  44. [Anonymous]
    Apr 3, 2005
    10
    Better than the sixth sense.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  45. PaulD.
    Aug 1, 2005
    3
    Preposterous & moronic plot foils the best efforts of cast & director.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  46. MarkB.
    Nov 13, 2004
    7
    There just isn't enough space, here or elsewhere, to adequately praise Julianne Moore. In films like Safe, Far from Heaven and The Hours, she corners the market on portrayals of suburban wives and mothers whose outward security and placidity eventually gives way to hidden fears and desires that polite society doesn't allow to be discussed much less dealt with. (It's interesting that the offscreen Moore seems to have such a happy, totally uncomplicated family life.) Though I'm sure its makers weren't ambitious enough to intend it to be, The Forgotten, a modest, trendily conspiracy-minded thriller, is an interesting addition to the above list of delineations of Moore's most recognizable screen character. She plays a mom whose beloved son almost literally disappears into thin air before the movie begins; other similarly afflicted parents she meets have not only taken their tragic losses in stride, but seem to have completely forgotten that their children ever even existed. Moore not only won't forget, but her behavior--which most of us would consider for the most part absolutely normal and understandable for a grieving parent who has been denied closure--is viewed by the others (and by society) as completely inappropriate and bizarre. There are definitely all sort of potentially provocative subtexts here, but writer Gerard DiPego (Phenomenon) and director Joseph Ruben don't take the opportunities. Although this movie could be described as "The 2004 M. Night Shyamalan Movie That M. Night DIDN'T Make", Ruben is no auteur like the brains behind The Village. A competent, workmanlike thriller director who, along with Jonathan Demme, John Waters, Joe Camp, Michael Schultz and Bob Clark (what a motley crew THAT is!) is one of the very few 2004 directors to have been working since the 1970s, Ruben is primarily interested in goosing you from behind and yelling "BOO!" And that he does very effectively; an out-of-nowhere shock that Steven Spielberg delivered so effectively in Jaws, but did once and only once, is repeated several times here. (Judging from the reaction of the audience I saw this with, I've no doubt that the theater ushers who clean up the spilled popcorn and drinks between showings really earned their pay with this one.) Maybe this is why (some Metacritic voters to the contrary) The Forgotten, despite its seemingly out-of-nowhere ending that really isn't, hasn't aroused the extreme anger among some moviegoers that Shyamalan's far more ambitious, accomplished and elegant The Village has. Through it all, Moore delivers yet another perfectly tuned characterization that beautifully portrays all the necessary emotional peaks and valleys of her character's journey without ever seeming false, over the top or straining for effect. All in all, with Moore, The Forgotten is more than the sum of its parts; without Moore, it would be far, far less.… Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  47. MarkB.
    Nov 13, 2004
    7
    There just isn't enough space, here or elsewhere, to adequately praise Julianne Moore. In films like Safe, Far from Heaven and The Hours, she corners the market on portrayals of suburban wives and mothers whose outward security and placidity eventually gives way to hidden fears and desires that polite society doesn't allow to be discussed much less dealt with. (It's interesting that the offscreen Moore seems to have such a happy, totally uncomplicated family life.) Though I'm sure its makers weren't ambitious enough to intend it to be, The Forgotten, a modest, trendily conspiracy-minded thriller, is an interesting addition to the above list of delineations of Moore's most recognizable screen character. She plays a mom whose beloved son almost literally disappears into thin air before the movie begins; other similarly afflicted parents she meets have not only taken their tragic losses in stride, but seem to have completely forgotten that their children ever even existed. Moore not only won't forget, but her behavior--which most of us would consider for the most part absolutely normal and understandable for a grieving parent who has been denied closure--is viewed by the others (and by society) as completely inappropriate and bizarre. There are definitely all sort of potentially provocative subtexts here, but writer Gerard DiPego (Phenomenon) and director Joseph Ruben don't take the opportunities. Although this movie could be described as "The 2004 M. Night Shyamalan Movie That M. Night DIDN'T Make", Ruben is no auteur like the brains behind The Village. A competent, workmanlike thriller director who, along with Jonathan Demme, John Waters, Joe Camp, Michael Schultz and Bob Clark (what a motley crew THAT is!) is one of the very few 2004 directors to have been working since the 1970s, Ruben is primarily interested in goosing you from behind and yelling "BOO!" And that he does very effectively; an out-of-nowhere shock that Steven Spielberg delivered so effectively in Jaws, but did once and only once, is repeated several times here. (Judging from the reaction of the audience I saw this with, I've no doubt that the theater ushers who clean up the spilled popcorn and drinks between showings really earned their pay with this one.) Maybe this is why (some Metacritic voters to the contrary) The Forgotten, despite its seemingly out-of-nowhere ending that really isn't, hasn't aroused the extreme anger among some moviegoers that Shyamalan's far more ambitious, accomplished and elegant The Village has. Through it all, Moore delivers yet another perfectly tuned characterization that beautifully portrays all the necessary emotional peaks and valleys of her character's journey without ever seeming false, over the top or straining for effect. All in all, with Moore, The Forgotten is more than the sum of its parts; without Moore, it would be far, far less.… Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  48. MichaelM.
    Oct 21, 2004
    6
    The film is consistently engrossing and entertaining. It has you on the edge of your seat almost the whole feature length. It has strong performances from both Julianne Moore (Boogie Nights, Magnolia) and Dominic West (HBO's impressive crime caper "The Wire"). It also has some cool special effects. But it all goes down the crapper when the ending comes. The ending is a major letdown, and almost spoils the whole movie. If it wasn't for the ending I'd recommend seeing it in theaters, but since it does have a very disappointing ending, I'd recommend waiting for DVD. … Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  49. JenS
    Dec 18, 2004
    8
    This movie totally spooked me out- in a good way. Yes, there are some plot holes, and some very weird scenes, but it was the kind of movie that makes you think about it long after you've seen it.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  50. JedD.
    Oct 23, 2004
    4
    What is this movie trying to say? That Julianne Moore's character loves her kid more than anyone else and that if you love your kid enough they'll come back even if they've died?
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  51. JohnE.
    Sep 24, 2004
    1
    Julianne Moore tries her hardest in the first half hour to prevent you from hoping the movie isn't what you think it is....but as the movie plunders on the cinematography and techniques [high fly bys] gives it away.....it's the X-Files after the polish wore off....it's similar to Shyamalan's Signs [which is not a good thing]. A wash out...luckily it s short....
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  52. AlbertW.
    Sep 25, 2004
    1
    I would write about the movie, but I forgot what it was...actually I guess there never was a movie....
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  53. Darwin
    Sep 25, 2004
    0
    Horrendous.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  54. JoshL.
    Sep 26, 2004
    3
    Despite a great opening aerial shot of New York and a car crash that will make you wet your pants in terror, the plot of this movie goes from strange to utterly inconcievable...it'll make you wonder what the writer was thinking.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  55. MaraK.
    Sep 26, 2004
    2
    Completly inplausible, and not scary at all. to put it simply, this movie MAKES NO SENSE!
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  56. HenryD.
    Sep 26, 2004
    0
    Ouch! Somebody wake me! This was as bad as it gets. Its already FORGOTTEN.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  57. DevynS.
    Sep 26, 2004
    4
    Did you ever wish you had some type of narrative after a movie to explain what you had seen? this movie is a perfect example of that. Maybe if they ever make a sequel we will find then out , they can call it "The Remembered."
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  58. JoeyM.
    Sep 27, 2004
    5
    Not so bad, but really not so good, either. Pros: some excellent acting, a couple of cool effects, a few genuine chills. Cons: some of the worst dialogue ever written, plot holes the size of Buicks, some cheesy effects. It is not the worst way you could spend your nine dollars, though you would probably have a better time watching it on HBO. Perhaps even in TNT.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  59. PrestonF.
    Sep 27, 2004
    5
    This movie was not good, oh it had it's moments and a group of fine actors but the writing slowly disappeared.
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  60. JackL.
    Nov 18, 2005
    6
    An average movie with alot of potentiel, had the ending been thought out with a bit more realism. Worth a rent if your into these kind of thriller's (like the sixth sense, etc.).
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  61. IanB
    Feb 22, 2005
    8
    This was a lot better than it is being portrayed. While it is disappointing that you won't be able experience the visuals in the theatre anymore, it is still worth a rental. It has an exciting and different plot - I was so worried it was going to break down into a run-of-the-mill devil movie that is so common. Instead it will present a completely different twist. Maybe it is because of this that some people don't like it. It definately makes you think more than your average horror flick. It has some horror parts but really is much more a thriller.… Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  62. jcs.
    Apr 25, 2005
    3
    Don't waste your money renting this. think "dude, where's my car". They had similar plots. Two people wake up, forget a bunch of stuff, and soon find out aliens had brainwashed them and stuff. This movie had so many plotholes that it's amazing that it even made it to theatres. If you like a movie that makes you wonder "who, where, why, what, when" after the credits roll, then this movie is for you. I, on the other hand, like those questions to be answered in the movie!!!… Expand
    • 0 of 0 users said yes
  63. chelano
    Oct 7, 2011
    5
    Ok I will say off the bat that the whole concept to the movie is a little strange. You start to figure most of it out by the middle of the film. By the end, it comes clear and is a little off. The cast on the other hand were pretty good. Julianne Moore was pretty excellent as well as Dominic West who also had a big part. Side characters were also good like Gary Sinise and my personal favorite from the movie, Linus Roache. He basically played the bad guy and really had no emotion until later in the film. But having no emotion made him a very creepy character to watch. I really wished more out of this movie. I guess the story was just ok for me, but I did enjoy watching it. I keep feeling like they could of took a different direction and did better though.… Expand
  64. Alexander_Fred
    Dec 9, 2011
    3
    The Forgotten starts off splendidly leaving questions unanswered so that suspense builds. Then, we discover the source of the missing children and the entire story crumbles. This film had the capacity to be a great mystery and psychological thriller with great themes of love, morality, and family, but ultimately, it becomes inane, far fetched, and a laughable farce.
prev next
Page:
  • 1

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
43 out of 100

Mixed or average reviews - based on 34 Critics

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 5 out of 34
  2. Mixed: 21 out of 34
  3. Negative: 8 out of 34
  1. Village Voice
    Reviewed by: Mark Holcomb
    40
    The resolution is as surprise-free as it is improbably sunny.
    Read full review
  2. Entertainment Weekly
    Reviewed by: Owen Gleiberman
    58
    A thriller of carefully cultivated murk. It's enigmatic in the worst sense, in that every explanation for what's going on holds less water than the last.
    Read full review
  3. Dallas Observer
    Reviewed by: Robert Wilonsky
    50
    Ultimately only Moore, with her eyes always half-damp and voice half-cracked and body language half-mad, keeps the movie on the ground, when it too often threatens to fly into the thin air, where the audience would laugh it off the screen.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »