- Studio: Paramount Pictures
- Release Date: Dec 25, 1990
User Score
6.7
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 128 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 96 out of 128
-
Mixed: 13 out of 128
-
Negative: 19 out of 128
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
PatrickM.Sep 26, 200710Yeah - definitely flawed - but still really great. Not so much a godfather film, as an attempt by Coppola to understand himself in middle-age.
-
-
JaredK.Nov 1, 200810Sofia Coppla isn't nough to ruin this. The cast is stellar!
-
-
Feb 18, 201310The amount of suspense towards the end is crazy and the ending really lets it all out, I haven't seen a scene more heartbreaking. There's less of the Godfather theme to it because its not as dark and it has no Marlon Brando, but its still the same characters and actors and it doesnt fail to show the fate of the Corleone family. One of the greatest movies Ive ever seen.
-
JackH.Nov 7, 20049While it doesn't quite live up to the cinematic greatness of the other movies, I still thoroughly enjoyed it and see no reason to disparage it.
-
-
EddieM.Sep 8, 20079Get a grip you lot - it's only a movie. And it's a really good movie too.
-
-
JamesEOct 15, 20079Not as good as the originals, but defiantly gripping and intense.
-
-
DouglasMJul 20, 20079
-
-
HudsonTNov 9, 20089Not perfect, but certainly better than part two. Ultimately, after hearing about how everyone was so disappointed with three, I was surprised by how good it was.
-
-
Jan 19, 20129
-
Feb 25, 20139No sabría decir que, pero algo en esta última entrega de la saga no me termino de cerrar del todo. No obstante, no deja de ser una obra maestra que no desmerece sus predecesoras en ningún momento.
-
100In this brilliantly sustained climax, Coppola unveils a vision of corruption that embraces the entire world, but he's also reveling in sheer theatrical magic in a way that only a master can.
-
30It's hard to tell if this thing's serious or parody and, if it is parody, whether or not it's intentional. Is it a winky joke, for instance, to have lightweight performer George Hamilton as Pacino's business attorney, or just ridiculous casting? Hamilton's performance points to the latter.
-
38The main performances are generally weak, although the smaller ones are sometimes brilliant, and the yarn never builds much momentum as it leapfrogs from one subplot to another. [28 Dec 1990, Arts, p.14]