- Studio: New Line Cinema
- Release Date: Dec 7, 2007
User Score
6.1
out of 10
Generally favorable reviews- based on 297 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 177 out of 297
-
Mixed: 32 out of 297
-
Negative: 88 out of 297
Review this movie
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
SimonR.Dec 3, 200710My favorite of the year. After reading the book, I couldn't wait to see how the movie would turn out. The action was amazing and the acting was incredible.
-
-
DavidH.Dec 3, 200710A wonderful Family movie, but it might not be good for under 10, but it's the best fantasy film of the year! Wow!
-
-
StephenP.Dec 7, 200710Excellent film. Surprisingly little was cut, and one of the most faithful book-movies I've ever seen.
-
-
ArtyS.Dec 8, 200710Great film. Excellent. A superb adaptation. Performances are really good. The bad thing is that New Line has rushed the film, all goes too fast, but it's really a great film, deep and really fun. Go and watch this, you will be very pleased.
-
-
LasseS.Dec 9, 200710How Chris Weitz managed to bring dramatic tension and build-up to such a short movie is beyond me. But I loved every minute of it, save for at few scenes that were just a bit too short. I will be seeing this in the cinemas for the third time too.
-
-
WarrenE.Jan 4, 200810
-
-
AmberSMay 3, 200810This movie was incredible. Although it was made family-friendly it was still unexpected when the jaw went flying off of the enemy ice bear. Nicole Kidman was fantastic and I would recommend it.
-
-
DominicKJun 13, 200810The secenary and the whole movie is done perfectly.
-
-
LorriW.May 2, 200910I love watching this movie with my 6 year old, she's just as amazed by it each time, it's wonderful to watch her reaction's.
-
-
AdamP.Dec 3, 200710Slow at first but picks up speed and leaves you really thinking.
-
-
ArmonMichaeliilliDec 3, 200710The Golden Compass is possibly the best fantasy film of all time. There is no sign or language what so ever of atheism!
-
-
JoshF.Dec 3, 200710A generally good film throughout, but unfortunately fell a little short of my expectations which I looked at and thought were very high. Nonetheless, a good start to a promising series.
-
-
JoeH.Dec 3, 200710Best movie of the year. I cannot wait for the sequels. Wow. What a movie. The special effects should be the frontrunner this February at the Oscars!
-
-
ClareC.Dec 3, 200710I loved this movie! Fantastic. Funny. Touching.
-
-
JoannaK.Dec 3, 200710Nicole Kidman at her best! It was smart and funny and the special effects were amazing.
-
-
MichaelF.Dec 3, 200710One of the wonders of the holiday season.
-
-
JanL.Dec 3, 200710Here is the jaw-dropping, eye-popping, heart-stopping movie epic we've been waiting for all year.
-
-
JamieR.Dec 3, 200710What a movie! This is how the medium seduced us originally.
-
-
MichaelA.Dec 3, 200710Break out the popcorn and prepare to be blown away. The Golden Compass is the most pulse- pounding fantasy movie of all time. Nicole Kidman and Dakota Blue Richards were amazing. Kidman was Academy Award Worthy.
-
-
WashereDec 4, 200710Saw a preview of it. Very good film and as close an adaptation as one can get with such a dense and complicated fantasy novel.
-
-
JoyceC.Dec 6, 200710
-
-
TerryC.Dec 7, 200710Ultimately there is no complex concepts to this, users say its a boring clunky execution, I say wrong, this is nearly perfect, the effects are astounding, the sound is stunning, it is an entertaining and totally great family fun.
-
-
GeorgeC.Dec 7, 200710I loved, the audience loved it, my family loved it, everyone said it was good as everyone trudged out of the theatre thinking wow look at me, i just saw a really awesome movie. Never heard any bad remarks, I thought it was really good, I don't know where any of these negative reviews are personally coming from. As far as I'm concerned this may be the next lord of the rings.
-
-
BillA.Dec 7, 200710Wild and fun, these dummy users are just rating this movie from its trailer, and I think the critics are too. Its like rating Lord of the ratings 5 or 4 out of 10.
-
-
ChristopherG.Dec 7, 200710
-
-
AmyS.Dec 8, 200710Loved every second, didn't want it to end!
-
-
SuzannaW.Dec 9, 200710
-
-
equality7-2521Dec 9, 200710
-
-
SarahP.Dec 3, 200710Nicole was amazing and Blue Richards was a find. Best of the year!
-
-
MichaelK.Dec 3, 200710The special effects were amazing. One of the best movies of the year, if not that best. The direction and writing was magnificent! Kidman for the Oscar!
-
-
ErikaF.Dec 3, 200710Loved this movie because it was not only smart and great, but it wasn't like 3 hours. Short and quick was the best way to go!
-
-
BijanN.Dec 3, 200710Nicole Kidman's best performance in years. Oscar worthy. Really it was.
-
-
AkivaL.Dec 3, 200710Fantastic. The most engaging and entertaining film of the year.
-
-
PauW.Dec 3, 200710GC is my favorite fantasy film of all time! Kidman should win awards with this performance. And I can't wait for the Other 2! Oscars for FX.
-
-
ColinRobertsonDec 3, 200710A poignant film that is fantastic. Explosive non-stop action.
-
-
JesicaE.Dec 3, 200710My favorite fantasy movie ever. I loved the Potters to death, but this sits on them forever!
-
-
FranB.Dec 3, 200710This movie should have no problem in breaking box office records. If there is any justice, this should be the highest grossing movie of the year.
-
-
SarahC.Dec 3, 200710Not as good as The Lord of the Rings, but who would think it could win 11 Oscars like Rings, but this was almost as good. So close. Okay, I loved them as much as the Rings.
-
-
gDec 7, 200710Very enjoyable, even though there were changes from the book. Great SFX, good acting, compelling story. Favorite movie of this year.
-
-
JohnP.Dec 7, 200710
-
-
GrantH.Dec 8, 200710Terrific entertainment. Hugely enjoyable. Brilliant young lead. Astounding special effects. What more can i say. Just go and see it!!!!
-
-
ShawnLDec 9, 200710
-
-
CoryGDec 11, 200710Absolutely outstanding in every way possible. I don't know what these other people saw...
-
-
GeorgeG.Dec 25, 200710If you didn't read the trilogy you would feel a litle lost, except that the movie is fabulous the effects the voices the cast everything..I can't wait for the second movie.
-
-
Aug 28, 201110
-
KenT.Jan 1, 20089A wonderful film. Where did these low scores come from? Is the Bible Belt trying to suppress dissenting views?
-
-
PaulK.Dec 10, 20079
-
-
JamieJamieDec 7, 20079Cuts a lot out of the books, but is generally very good.
-
-
JohnS.Dec 9, 20079
-
-
JeffSDec 9, 20079
-
-
RobertT.Dec 9, 20079An awesome depiction of an alternate steampunk universe.
-
-
BrandonBMay 2, 20089
-
-
DevynSDec 10, 20079The beginning may be a bit confusing if you have not read any of the books - it seemed a bit disjointed, like too much had been left out. About a third of the way in, it picked up and didn't seem like there were any more gaps. On an unrelated note, my friends and I unanimously decided that Iorek Byrnison is the greatest thing since sliced bread.
-
-
NerexT.Dec 26, 20079A great adaption, if you look deep the original themes are still present and it does not fail to promote an open mind and retake a look at our own world in a different perspective. The ending seems aprubt but leaves with a very good hint on not only what is to come, but also what to look into and analyze deeper until the sequel is released. All in all I can only recommend it.
-
-
AaronS.Dec 29, 20079
-
-
RonB.Dec 6, 20079Stunning visuals, great bears, and fascinating ideas. Marred only by the unnecessary exposition at the beginning, the watered-down dialogue, and the early ending (compared with the book).
-
-
HardyC.Dec 6, 20079A fun time at the movies, with all the works.
-
-
KennyS.Dec 9, 20079The movie was visually stunning and followed the plot of the book fairly well. However the ending was nothing like in the book and leaves me hoping that they will release a version of the DVD with the ending they filmed and had originally intended.
-
-
NicholasJ.Dec 12, 20079Rated high for magical special effects.
-
-
GeneJ.Dec 28, 20079Beautifully shot and ornamented with some of the best CGI I've ever seen. I found the story line a little obscure and the church / soul metaphors a bit heavy-handed, but not objectionable. It was a delightful film that should entertain any from 12-80 yrs old. I think it has been very under-rated!
-
-
CourtneyWJun 3, 20088I really liked this movie. Visually, it was stunning. The effects were wonderful and I loved watching all the animals! The only problem I had was that, not having read the books, I didn't realize it ended kind of in the middle of the story, a la Lord of the Rings. But very good movie!
-
-
SophieMDec 7, 20078
-
-
TylerD.Dec 7, 20078A fantastic movie. Wonderful execution, great acting, and breathtaking visuals (seriously, the polar bears look insane.) The ending, however, lacked.
-
-
JosephC.Dec 8, 20078
-
-
ElinaDec 8, 20078A brave and mostly successful attempt at adapting a challenging and intellectual fantasy book for the screen. The film has pacing problems, but the visuals and acting are great -- Dakota Blue Richards as Lyra is marvelous. Well worth seeing!
-
-
MickD.Dec 9, 20078As an adaptation of the brilliant novels it's not very good, but it's a great kids fantasy film nonetheless.
-
-
RyanD.Dec 13, 20078I thought was pretty good, it didn't follow the story very well, but it's a movie.
-
-
DanH.Dec 13, 20078
-
-
JohnR.Dec 7, 20078It really isn't that bad, but the movie was too hollywoodized. If you read the books this can be a frustrating movie
-
-
KevODec 9, 20078I liked it, the acting was good but I wish it was longer. That's just a limitation of the medium used though.
-
-
CocoaF.Jan 5, 20088I loved the Golden Compass, it was action filled in every scene, I loved the Golden Compass.
-
-
DJImDec 10, 20078This is a good movie. the lower ratings are irate hard core religious who object to the atheist subtext and probably didn't see the movie.
-
-
DustinM.Dec 12, 20078This should have been a three hour movie. Deeper plot/character development and a real ending would have made this so much better.
-
-
MeganP.Dec 4, 20078Due to spot-on casting and stunning visual effects, this is one extremely satisfied fan of the books.
-
-
JaneDec 7, 20078Thought it was aesthetically in keeping with the book. Beautiful at moments. Hardly "shockingly violent" -- there's no blood at any point whatsoever.
-
-
kalliDec 8, 20078Read the Roger Ebert review -- he captures what my experience was of the movie. I'm really surprised it's receiving so many so-so reviews.
-
-
JonKMay 11, 20088
-
-
MrToadDec 23, 20078
-
-
Jul 6, 20118
-
MaxW.Jan 3, 20087
-
-
DaveSDec 3, 20077Worth seeing but a lot was cut out from the books. See it if you didn't read it or did, its good either way.
-
-
PaulF.Dec 7, 20077
-
-
AldenL.Dec 8, 20077
-
-
MichaelT.Dec 9, 20077Meh, it was a nice movie, certainly entertaining, but it could have been better... Some plotholes and rush-rush editing.... But on the whole a nice movie.
-
-
KelvinLJan 9, 20086
-
-
JaredMDec 10, 20076For those that have read the books, this movie tries too hard to encompass everything and thusly spends no time on creating character bonds. The story is there but the progression of the story is lacking. Too busy, not enough time spent on making me care.
-
-
JayH.Apr 24, 20086Too complex for it's own good, rather than to flow steadily, it comes off more muddled than anything else. However, the art direction and sets are wonderful, and even though the special effects are computer generated, I thought they were terrific and imaginative. Family film? I can't see most kids sitting through the whole film. It sure is pretty to look at though.
-
-
GregAMay 25, 20086
-
-
MorganFJul 20, 20086A great visual experience, but it failed to convey Pullmans sense of mystery. The ending was also at the wrong time, and you could tell they were rushing in some parts.
-
-
HollyC.Dec 10, 20076
-
-
[Anonymous]Dec 7, 20076Dumbed down beyond belief.
-
-
KevinMDec 7, 20076I believe that the director never read the book, opting instead to read the Cliff Notes while crossing off all the themes and replacing them with things like "generic friendship theme" and "generic courage theme". If you never read the books, it's a solid movie. If you wanted a more accurate transferal from book to screen, you will be thoroughly disappointed.
-
-
RyanK.Dec 7, 20076
-
-
TonyS.Dec 9, 20076Good, but I was expecting much more. I would have been happier if this movie had been rated (PG). This is a PG-13 movie right? I should figured something was a miss when the movie theater was flooded with kids....but I didn't. Parents just drop your kids off and pick them up when its over (cause there ain't much there for you).
-
-
LuisG.Feb 27, 20086It's hard not to feel like your being sold repetiveness after harry potter takes the crown and narnia steps down as well... compass is a good film .... visually stunning ... hope thers a sequel.
-
-
JoeyKMay 25, 20086Decent. The visuals were great, across the board. The acting was solid. The message was good. The problem is, the movie watches like a detailed synopsis of the book, not a new portrayal of it. During the translation, they failed to turn the book into something cinematically functional. Overall, the movie is decent, regardless, but it certainly feels like an ad for a much better book.
-
-
DaveFDec 11, 20076Watered-down, heavily-censored version of a dark and subtle story. Has its moments--most are eye-rolling, not heart-stopping. I was half-expecting the polar bears to whip out bottles of Coke.
-
-
JoshuaD.Dec 23, 20076I thought this was an average fantasy film based on a brilliant book. Too many wooden performances dragged the film down (which was mostly dependent on the special effects anyway). The ending was neither as suspenseful or as satisfying as I remember the book to be which only keeps me wondering how the sequel will be dealt with.
-
-
Sep 3, 20126The movie itself is quite impressive. However, the story is way too bizarre and complicated for a child even an adult to follow. it tries to be the next huge movie series, but doesn't fill the excitement with good characters.
-
GwilymD.Dec 7, 20075A dull and perfunctory adaptation of one of the greatest books of our time. Feels flat, should have been half an hour longer to let scenes grow and characters breathe. MASSIVE mistake in cutting the ending and changing the running of the plot (to create several unfathomable strands)
-
-
63One key missing element: the world in which this story takes place never feels unique. We aren't drawn into it the way we were with Middle Earth or Hogwarts. In fact, with all the airships flying around, there are times when it feels like an extension of Stardust.
-
70A "soft" epic, a film touching on childhood fantasies with sturdy, unwavering characters driven to evil or good. More "Harry Potter," in other words, than "Beowulf."
-
50Impressively rendered but oddly uninviting adventure.