The House I Live In shows Nannie Jeter as she hopefully watches Barack Obama's 2008 electoral victory, but doesn't analyze the current president's apparent reluctance to significantly alter anti-drug policies.
Awards & Rankings
Universal acclaim- based on 14 Ratings
Oct 17, 2012It's a good documentary in that there are so many issues addressed therein that require examination (and often indignation), but it goes a bitIt's a good documentary in that there are so many issues addressed therein that require examination (and often indignation), but it goes a bit too far and fails to even posit alternatives. I love that they highlight the difference in sentencing guidelines between powder and crack cocaine. Completely asinine, even if you don't believe that it's targeting non-whites. The other issue that I feel is huge is the manipulation of federal housing assistance - ex-cons were denied housing assistance for all but the "red" zones on the city maps - essentially the ghettos. What was not discussed in this film was exactly how the experts would deal with drug dealers in absence of jail sentences. And when the son of the Columbia professor says that he can't raise 2 kids on $8 an hour, the father should have said, "YES, YOU CAN!..... It's a start! Get 2 jobs paying $8 each, and make your dollars last!" It seems that personal accountability is not given enough weight in the discussion. And comparing the US war on drugs to the Holocaust was disgusting. I know there are elements in common between genocide and marginalizing a group of people for actually doing wrong (buying and using drugs), but David Simon (who I love from "the Wire") goes too far when he suggests that the US policy is becoming "Kill the Poor." Hard-working poor folks who don't commit crimes? Those are the people killed in Germany, Poland, Cambodia, and Russia. They don't go to prison and get killed in the U.S. It's a bridge too far, and takes away from many of the valuable lessons of the film.… Full Review »
Sep 7, 2014The house I live in is an attack on the American "War on drugs," starting by shedding light on its flawed execution, and working backwards toThe house I live in is an attack on the American "War on drugs," starting by shedding light on its flawed execution, and working backwards to its flawed intent. But, because the user review section of meta-critic is unlikely to be a fruitful source of insight into this issue, I'll just talk about how this is as a documentary.
This is a nearly perfectly made documentary. The talking heads are all either academics who are educated, concise, and articulate, or they are individuals living in a world where both drugs and the drag war might be the biggest determining factor in their lives.
This movie proposes no real solution to the problems it sees, but whenever I want an example of the perfect mix of logos, pathos, and ethos, I point to this film. A must-see for documentary fans and anybody who wants to further develop their thoughts on drug law.… Full Review »
Sep 15, 2013It's amazing that this documentary film has received only one user review so far. And a pretty negative one at that.
First, let me say thatIt's amazing that this documentary film has received only one user review so far. And a pretty negative one at that.
First, let me say that I am an observer from way across the Atlantic Ocean, but since the American view on things often seem to somehow find its way over here in one way or another, I was still mighty interested.
To be honest, I started watching this film expecting an analysis of the American prison system, but it is far more than just that. It is about their "war on drugs" throughout the last 100 years, the curtain of politics and laws thrown up around it, and the effects that it now has on the American society. Yes, we are talking about developments that started during the early years of the 20th century, when the use of certain drugs was first made illegal. The reasons behind this, which are given around halfway during the film, are actually pretty shocking to say the least.
Note that there was a time when the use of opium, even cocaine and heroin were considered useful and good in many ways, similar to alcohol, caffeine and nicotine nowadays. There are parts of a 1995 WHO study (specifically the use of cocaine) which provide a very interesting read on this subject.
Although the film does trace its roots back to almost a century ago, it mostly focuses on the situation as it has developed during the last 30-40 years. It talks about the rigorous laws that have come into effect (e.g. with heavy minimum sentencing and extreme multiple strike laws), how they came to be (e.g. by presidents using popular catchphrases, with Nixon as an unexpected exception to the rule), and how these laws are actually pushing entire families into a negative spiral of drug abuse and criminality instead of keeping them out of it. In the last few minutes, as mentioned by another reviewer, it even goes so far as to compare the developments during this "war on drug(user)s" to those during the "war on jews" (i.e. the holocaust). Accurate as this comparison may be, it feels as if the filmmaker is looking for a bit of shock value here, which does not match the perfectly neutral view he manages to maintain during the rest of the documentary, even when it comes to racial issues. Because that is where its strength actually lies.
"The House I Live In" is such an astoundingly good documentary because it manages to provide such an excellent, neutral overview of an incredibly sophisticated, deeply rooted and yet greatly ignored problem. It presents views from all different directions, be it a drug addicts' heartbroken mother who herself has a very troubled history, a stereotypical prison ward who feels he was born for his job, or a college professor who managed to escape the system and is now doing the best he can to keep his son out of it. Everyone gets a word, and the surprising fact is that everyone agrees that the "war on drugs" is not the right way to fight this fight.
In the end, this film does not provide anyone with a ready solution; it merely observes the situation. It gives you plenty of room to make your own opinion on the matter, despite the fact that, as mentioned, there are some graphic analogies made towards the conclusion of the film which somewhat force you into a specific direction. But luckily, the documentary shows that there is some light at the end of this dark tunnel: after decades and decades of failure, more and more people are realising that the current system does not work, and that some things desperately need to change.
By the way, be "warned" that every topic is discussed in a fair but somewhat frank manner; African Americans are just referred to as blacks, people are shown dealing and actually doing drugs, some actual imagery from the holocaust is shown. No euphemisms here. This is an adult documentary about adult themes. But it has one important lesson which is especially important for younger people, those who are the future: do not ever let anyone tell you that some group of people is bad or less than you in any way.… Full Review »