- Studio: Miramax Films
- Release Date: Oct 31, 2003
User Score
5.9
out of 10
Mixed or average reviews- based on 23 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 15 out of 23
-
Mixed: 1 out of 23
-
Negative: 7 out of 23
Review this movie
-
Your Score10 out of 10
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
-
Characters remaining: 5000 out of 5000
- User score
- Most active
- By date
- Most helpful
- Most Clicked
-
JoeS.Apr 27, 20068Kidman and especially Ed Harris deliver world-class acting. Wanna see true acting skill? Watch Harris in this movie. The cinematography almost pulls your heart out of your chest. The music -- especially at the end -- is very effective. Somehow this movie really has an emotional effect, even though the story itself is not that engaging.
-
-
EfeB.Jul 30, 20042
-
-
JasonZ.Aug 10, 20046
-
-
BenjitheGreatAug 2, 20041
-
-
VinceH.Sep 10, 20048
-
-
PatC.Sep 7, 20047An interesting if sluggishly intense drama about the damage people inflict on each other when they are unable to defer action and await clarity. A noble effort, and there is a great moral in this story about the insidiousness of racism, but it was overshadowed by the realization that this movie was about interesting things happening to dull people.
-
-
RobertaD.Nov 6, 20034
-
-
TerryNov 6, 20031One point each for two great actors? Okay I can't add, but minus 1 point for a movie that sucked. It's over in the first 15 minutes. What you see is what you get and it never changes. Sucked.
-
-
DeWayneP.Mar 31, 200410Excellent!
-
-
CarolinaS.Jun 26, 20043Total bore, completely miscast, terrible script right up there w/Mystic River. Did have fun completely ripping it apart though.
-
-
RichardSJul 26, 20048
-
-
AimeeP.Feb 7, 20052Very bad movie - I kept waiting for something to happen and it never did. If you like watching older men lay in bed with much younger women for 2 hours, watch this movie.
-
-
[Anonymous]Mar 7, 200510Resplendant.
-
-
FrankOMar 25, 20098This movie had surprising depth that I was not prepared for. Although the casting did seem out of place, I enjoyed the storyline, especially Silk's dilemma regarding his family and passing as white. It was a surprise twist in the film and well worth the wait.
-
-
NathanM.Nov 6, 200310Nicole Kidman what a star!!!! She is wonderful in this role!!! 10/10 i think its oscar number 2 for Miss Kidman or at the least her 3rd straight nomination.
-
-
SuperNicDec 14, 20037Good Movie, but it's neither well constructed nor well directed. A 10 for Nicole Kidman. What a great performance!
-
-
PatG.Oct 31, 20038Okay, okay, Hopkins and Kidman are not what you might expect re casting. But they are excellent, and the movie is fully absorbing and thought-provoking. I found it two hours very well spent.
-
-
DavidS.Jul 19, 20042Nicole and Hopkins were completely miscast. There was no chemistry on film. The film also ended as it started with nothing in between. The story lack any beef. Like a Big MAc you still want to eat more, there was nothing there. Hopkins recently said there was a movie he wish he hadn't acted in.. I think this was it.
-
-
TonyB.Dec 11, 20056
-
prev
next
Page:
- 1
-
The thriller aspects of the story and the overall solid level of acting -- including a sexy performance from a red-hot Nicole Kidman -- keep the audience interested but never fully emotionally involved.
-
75The Human Stain is heavy going. It's the flashes of dramatic lightning that make it a trip worth taking.
-
80Elegant, thoughtful film.